Literature DB >> 22110787

Mandibular Angle Fractures: A Clinical and Biomechanical Comparison-the Works of Ellis and Haug.

Richard H Haug, Bethany L Serafin.   

Abstract

In a series of articles spanning 8 years, Ed Ellis reviewed the clinical results of the treatment of 478 mandibular angle fractures managed by eight different techniques. During a series of benchtop investigations employing polyurethane synthetic mandible replicas, Rich Haug investigated the biomechanical behavior of approximately 15 different techniques designed to reconstruct mandibular angle fractures. This article reviews these two series of investigations in an attempt to gain insight into the biomechanical and biological factors that affect the successful reconstruction of mandibular angle fractures. It appears that the current techniques used to reconstruct mandibular angle fractures are sound from the standpoint of biomechanics within a range of forces encountered during clinical function. It also appears that an unsuccessful reconstruction is based on a biological result of a behavioral issue such as noncompliance, substance abuse, and/or nutritional or immune compromise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mandibular angle fractures; biomechanics; polyurethane synthetic mandible replicas; stiffness; yield displacement; yield load; yield point

Year:  2008        PMID: 22110787      PMCID: PMC3052729          DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1098961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  23 in total

1.  An in vitro comparison of the effect of number and pattern of positional screws on load resistance.

Authors:  R H Haug; J E Barber; A P Punjabi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.

Authors:  Richard H Haug; Chad C Street; Michele Goltz
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using two mini dynamic compression plates.

Authors:  E Ellis; N Karas
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Medical and scientific uses of human tissue.

Authors:  O O'Neill
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  A comparison of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques.

Authors:  R H Haug; J E Barber; R Reifeis
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1996-09

6.  Photoelastic analysis of miniplate osteosynthesis for mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  R A Rudman; S C Rosenthal; C Shen; J D Ruskin; P G Ifju
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1997-08

7.  An in vitro comparison of the mechanical characteristics of three sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.

Authors:  M T Murphy; R H Haug; J E Barber
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Complications of nonrigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  L A Passeri; E Ellis; D P Sinn
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Elastic properties of human supraorbital and mandibular bone.

Authors:  P C Dechow; G A Nail; C L Schwartz-Dabney; R B Ashman
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Effect of screw number on reconstruction plating.

Authors:  R H Haug
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1993-06
View more
  7 in total

1.  Mechanical and microstructural properties of fixation systems used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Marcelo Breno Meneses Mendes; Raquel Correia de Medeiros; Andrezza Lauria; Érica Marchiori; Renato Sawazaki; Éder Sócrates Najar Lopes; Roger William Fernandes Moreira
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-11-13

2.  Isolated bilateral mandibular angle fractures: an extensive literature review of the rare clinical phenomenon with presentation of a classical clinical model.

Authors:  P Elavenil; S Mohanavalli; B Sasikala; R Ashok Prasanna; Raja V B Krishnakumar
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-24

3.  Complication rate in mandibular angle fractures-one vs. two plates: a 12-year retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Raphael Ferrari; M Lanzer; D Wiedemeier; M Rücker; M Bredell
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Mandible Fractures- Level 2 Tutorial.

Authors:  Carl-Peter Cornelius; Laurent Audigé; Christoph Kunz; Randal Rudderman; Carlos H Buitrago-Téllez; John Frodel; Joachim Prein
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-12

5.  Craniomaxillofacial trauma: synopsis of 14,654 cases with 35,129 injuries in 15 years.

Authors:  Anna Kraft; Elisabeth Abermann; Robert Stigler; Clemens Zsifkovits; Florian Pedross; Frank Kloss; Robert Gassner
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-03

6.  An in vitro comparison between two different designs of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Valdir Cabral Andrade; Leonardo Flores Luthi; Fabio Loureiro Sato; Leandro Pozzer; Sergio Olate; Jose Ricardo Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-06-23

7.  Development of a Titanium Plate for Mandibular Angle Fractures with a Bone Defect in the Lower Border: Finite Element Analysis and Mechanical Test.

Authors:  Douglas Rangel Goulart; Daniel Takanori Kemmoku; Pedro Yoshito Noritomi; Márcio de Moraes
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2015-06-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.