Literature DB >> 2210981

Complete androgen blockade as primary treatment for advanced metastatic cancer of the prostate.

J F Larsen1, S Walter, T Krarup.   

Abstract

The results of a series of non-randomized studies suggest that complete androgen blockade, i.e. medical or surgical castration in association with an antiandrogen, is superior to castration alone as regard survival potential. This report presents 11 untreated patients (Stage T2-4, Nx, M1), who were treated with complete androgen blockade, orchiectomy and a pure antiandrogen (Flutamide 250 mg three times a day). The rate of subjective response was 100% and the median time to progression was 12 months. The objective response rate was 82% and the rates of partial remission at one and two years were 45% and 18%, respectively. The survival rates after one and two years were 91% and 53%, respectively, a result which is consistent with that of other studies on the survival of patients with metastatic cancer of the prostate treated with either diethylstilboestrol, orchiectomy or LH-releasing hormones. The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that androgen blockade improves the survival of patients with advanced metastatic cancer of the prostate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2210981     DOI: 10.1007/bf02550402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  9 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of stage IV carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  M I Resnick; J T Grayhack
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Complete androgen blockade for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  F Labrie; A Dupont; A Belanger
Journal:  Important Adv Oncol       Date:  1985

3.  Treatment and survival of patients with cancer of the prostate. The Veterans Administration Co-operative Urological Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1967-05

Review 4.  Criteria for evaluating patient responses to treatment modalities for prostatic cancer.

Authors:  N H Slack; G P Murphy
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Leuprolide versus diethylstilbestrol for metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  New approach in the treatment of prostate cancer: complete instead of partial withdrawal of androgens.

Authors:  F Labrie; A Dupont; A Belanger; Y Lacoursiere; J P Raynaud; J M Husson; J Gareau; A T Fazekas; J Sandow; G Monfette
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 7.  Treatment of prostate cancer with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

Authors:  F Labrie; A Dupont; A Bélanger; R St-Arnaud; M Giguère; Y Lacourcière; J Emond; G Monfette
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Flutamide versus stilboestrol in the management of advanced prostatic cancer. A controlled prospective study.

Authors:  F Lund; F Rasmussen
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1988-02

9.  National randomized study of chemotherapeutic agents in advanced prostatic carcinoma: a progress report.

Authors:  D E Johnson; W W Scott; R P Gibbons; G R Prout; J D Schmidt; T M Chu; J Gaeta; J Saroff; G P Murphy
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.