PURPOSE: Mice are often used as small animal models of brain ischemia, venous thrombosis, or vasospasm. This article aimed at providing an overview of the currently available methodologies for in vivo imaging of the murine cerebrovasculature and comparing the capabilities and limitations of the different methods. METHODS: Micro-computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed during intra-arterial and intravenous administration of a contrast agent bolus. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed during intra-arterial administration of contrast agent using the micro-CT scanner. Time-of-flight (ToF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was performed using a small animal scanner (9.4 T) equipped with a cryogenic transceive quadrature coil. Datasets were compared for scan time, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), temporal and spatial resolution, radiation dose, contrast agent dose and detailed recognition of cerebrovascular structures. RESULTS: Highest spatial resolution was achieved using micro-CTA (16 x 16 x 16 µm) and DSA (14 x 14 µm). Compared to micro-CTA (20-40 s) and ToF-MRA (57 min), DSA provided highest temporal resolutions (30 fps) allowing analyses of the cerebrovascular blood flow. Highest mean CNR was reached using ToF-MRA (50.7 ± 15.0), while CNR of micro-CTA depended on the intra-arterial (19.0 ± 1.0) and intravenous (1.3 ± 0.4) use of agents. The CNR of DSA was 10.0 ± 1.8. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dedicated small animal scanners allows cerebrovascular imaging in live animals as small as mice. As each of the methods analyzed has its advantages and limitations, choosing the best suited imaging modality for a defined question is of great importance. By this means the aforementioned methods offer a great potential for future projects in preclinical cerebrovascular research including ischemic stroke or vasospasm.
PURPOSE:Mice are often used as small animal models of brain ischemia, venous thrombosis, or vasospasm. This article aimed at providing an overview of the currently available methodologies for in vivo imaging of the murine cerebrovasculature and comparing the capabilities and limitations of the different methods. METHODS: Micro-computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed during intra-arterial and intravenous administration of a contrast agent bolus. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed during intra-arterial administration of contrast agent using the micro-CT scanner. Time-of-flight (ToF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was performed using a small animal scanner (9.4 T) equipped with a cryogenic transceive quadrature coil. Datasets were compared for scan time, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), temporal and spatial resolution, radiation dose, contrast agent dose and detailed recognition of cerebrovascular structures. RESULTS: Highest spatial resolution was achieved using micro-CTA (16 x 16 x 16 µm) and DSA (14 x 14 µm). Compared to micro-CTA (20-40 s) and ToF-MRA (57 min), DSA provided highest temporal resolutions (30 fps) allowing analyses of the cerebrovascular blood flow. Highest mean CNR was reached using ToF-MRA (50.7 ± 15.0), while CNR of micro-CTA depended on the intra-arterial (19.0 ± 1.0) and intravenous (1.3 ± 0.4) use of agents. The CNR of DSA was 10.0 ± 1.8. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dedicated small animal scanners allows cerebrovascular imaging in live animals as small as mice. As each of the methods analyzed has its advantages and limitations, choosing the best suited imaging modality for a defined question is of great importance. By this means the aforementioned methods offer a great potential for future projects in preclinical cerebrovascular research including ischemic stroke or vasospasm.
Authors: K Myojin; A Taguchi; K Umetani; K Fukushima; N Nishiura; T Matsuyama; H Kimura; D M Stern; Y Imai; H Mori Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Eric J Salomon; Joe Barfett; Peter W A Willems; Sasikhan Geibprasert; Susanna Bacigaluppi; Timo Krings Journal: Klin Neuroradiol Date: 2009-08-23
Authors: Hans Ulrich Kerl; Cristina T Isaza; Hanne Boll; Sebastian J Schambach; Ingo S Nolte; Christoph Groden; Marc A Brockmann Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Mutsumi Nagai; Cigdem Erkuran Yilmaz; Daniel Kirchhofer; Charles T Esmon; Nigel Mackman; D Neil Granger Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Eugene Kim; Spyros Stamatelos; Jana Cebulla; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Aleksander S Popel; Arvind P Pathak Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Vanessa Weyer; Máté E Maros; Andrea Kronfeld; Stefanie Kirschner; Christoph Groden; Clemens Sommer; Yasemin Tanyildizi; Martin Kramer; Marc A Brockmann Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Stefanie Kirschner; Manuela C Felix; Linda Hartmann; Miriam Bierbaum; Máté E Maros; Hans U Kerl; Frederik Wenz; Gerhard Glatting; Martin Kramer; Frank A Giordano; Marc A Brockmann Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Axel Neulen; Michael Kosterhon; Tobias Pantel; Stefanie Kirschner; Hermann Goetz; Marc A Brockmann; Sven R Kantelhardt; Serge C Thal Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2018-07-28 Impact factor: 1.355