| Literature DB >> 22108907 |
Salvatore Brugaletta1, Josep Gomez-Lara, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Jung Ho Heo, Vasim Farooq, Robert J van Geuns, Bernard Chevalier, Stephan Windecker, Dougal McClean, Leif Thuesen, Robert Whitbourn, Ian Meredith, Cecile Dorange, Susan Veldhof, Richard Rapoza, John A Ormiston, Patrick W Serruys.
Abstract
Serial intravascular ultrasound virtual histology (IVUS-VH) after implantation of metallic stents has been unable to show any changes in the composition of the scaffolded plaque overtime. The everolimus-eluting ABSORB scaffold potentially allows for the formation of new fibrotic tissue on the scaffolded coronary plaque during bioresorption. We examined the 12 month IVUS-VH changes in composition of the plaque behind the struts (PBS) following the implantation of the ABSORB scaffold. Using IVUS-VH and dedicated software, the composition of the PBS was analyzed in all patients from the ABSORB Cohort B2 trial, who were imaged with a commercially available IVUS-VH console (s5i system, Volcano Corporation, Rancho Cordova, CA, USA), immediately post-ABSORB implantation and at 12 month follow-up. Paired IVUS-VH data, recorded with s5i system, were available in 17 patients (18 lesions). The analysis demonstrated an increase in mean PBS area (2.39 ± 1.85 mm(2) vs. 2.76 ± 1.79 mm(2), P = 0.078) and a reduction in the mean lumen area (6.37 ± 0.90 mm(2) vs. 5.98 ± 0.97 mm(2), P = 0.006). Conversely, a significant decrease of 16 and 30% in necrotic core (NC) and dense calcium (DC) content, respectively, were evident (median % NC from 43.24 to 36.06%, P = 0.016; median % DC from 20.28 to 11.36%, P = 0.002). Serial IVUS-VH analyses of plaque located behind the ABSORB struts at 12-month demonstrated an increase in plaque area with a decrease in its NC and DC content. Larger studies are required to investigate the clinical impact of these findings.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22108907 PMCID: PMC3463791 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9981-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357
Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics
| Patients (n = 17) | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| Mean ± SD (n) | 60.5 ± 9.1 |
| Men, n (%) | 14 (82) |
| Smokers, n (%) | 1 (6) |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 2 (12) |
| Hypertension requiring medication, n (%) | 11 (65) |
| Hyperlipidaemia requiring medication, n (%) | 11 (65) |
| Previous PCI, n (%) | 2 (11) |
| Previous myocardial infarction, n (%) | 2 (13) |
| Stable angina, n (%) | 11 (65) |
| Unstable angina, n (%) | 4 (24) |
| Silent ischaemia, n (%) | 2 (12) |
| Target vessel, n (%) | |
| Left anterior descending | 11 (61) |
| Left circumflex | 2 (11) |
| Right coronary artery | 5 (28) |
| AHA/ACC lesion classification, n (%) | |
| A | 0 (0) |
| B1 | 11 (65) |
| B2 | 5 (29) |
| Medical treatment, n (%) | |
| ß-blockers | 13 (80) |
| ACE-inhibitors | 9 (55) |
| Statins | 16 (94) |
SD standard deviation, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, AHA/ACC American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology
Fig. 1Example of reduction of necrotic core and dense calcium in the plaque behind the polymeric struts (white arrows). Note also the increase of plaque size with predominant content of fibrous tissue. Yellow contour is drawn behind the ABSORB polymeric struts in a semi-automatic way by the dedicated software, excluding struts from the VH quantification of the plaque behind
Fig. 2Incidence of segments with necrotic core in contact with the lumen at baseline and follow-up
Fig. 3Representative IVUS-VH image of necrotic core in contact with the lumen in the proximal reference segment at baseline and which has disappeared at follow-up
IVUS analysis in the scaffold segment at baseline and follow-up (n = 18 lesions)
| Baseline | Follow-up | Difference % based on individual data |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean EEM area (mm2) | 14.08 ± 3.14 | 14.32 ± 3.13 | 2.54 ± 12.77 | 0.349 |
| PBS area (mm2) | 2.39 ± 1.85 | 2.76 ± 1.79 | 7.31 (−3.86 to 26.54) | 0.078 |
| Mean Lumen area (mm2) | 6.37 ± 0.90 | 5.98 ± 0.97 | −6.19 ± 7.13 | 0.006 |
| Fibrous tissue (mm2) | 0.59 (0.28–1.11) | 1.01 (0.59–1.94) | 42.76 (14.91–122.31) | 0.004 |
| Fibrous tissue (%) | 28.10 (26.15–33.31) | 43.90 (34.82–51.35) | 45.02 (13.06–62.50) | 0.001 |
| Fibro-fatty tissue (mm2) | 0.04 (0.01–0.14) | 0.12 (0.06–0.22) | 200.14 (50.52–819.11) | 0.011 |
| Fibro-fatty tissue (%) | 1.82 (0.83–4.08) | 5.16 (3.85–6.86) | 163.77 (56.34–513.07) | 0.004 |
| Necrotic core (mm2) | 0.89 (0.52–1.53) | 0.81 (0.59–1.41) | −8.29 (−18.64–11.35) | 0.369 |
| Necrotic core (%) | 43.24 (38.77–52.71) | 36.06 (32.53–43.79) | −15.59 (−27.87–1.06) | 0.016 |
| Dense calcium (mm2) | 0.39 (0.08–0.55) | 0.27 (0.15–0.46) | −20.94 (−42.72–14.30) | 0.048 |
| Dense calcium (%) | 20.28 (11.95–27.04) | 11.36 (8.59–18.78) | −30.16 (−50.71–−20.20) | 0.002 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median and interquartile range, according to their normal or not normal distribution, respectively
EEM external elastic membrane, PBS plaque behind struts