BACKGROUND & AIMS: Only a fraction of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have increased perceptual sensitivity to rectal distension, indicating differences in processing and/or modulation of visceral afferent signals. We investigated the brain mechanisms of these perceptual differences. METHODS: We analyzed data from 44 women with IBS and 20 female healthy subjects (controls). IBS symptom severity was determined by a severity scoring system. Anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed using the hospital anxiety and depression score. Blood oxygen level-dependent signals were measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging during expectation and delivery of high (45 mmHg) and low (15 mmHg) intensity rectal distensions. Perception thresholds to rectal distension were determined in the scanner. Brain imaging data were compared among 18 normosensitive and 15 hypersensitive patients with IBS and 18 controls. Results were reported significant if peak P-values were ≤.05, with family-wise error correction in regions of interest. RESULTS: The subgroups of patients with IBS were similar in age, symptom duration, psychological symptoms, and IBS symptom severity. Although brain responses to distension were similar between normosensitive patients and controls, hypersensitive patients with IBS had greater activation of insula and reduced deactivation in pregenual anterior cingulate cortex during noxious rectal distensions, compared to controls and normosensitive patients with IBS. During expectation of rectal distension, normosensitive patients with IBS had more activation in right hippocampus than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similarities in symptoms, hyper- and normosensitive patients with IBS differ in cerebral responses to standardized rectal distensions and their expectation, consistent with differences in ascending visceral afferent input. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Only a fraction of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have increased perceptual sensitivity to rectal distension, indicating differences in processing and/or modulation of visceral afferent signals. We investigated the brain mechanisms of these perceptual differences. METHODS: We analyzed data from 44 women with IBS and 20 female healthy subjects (controls). IBS symptom severity was determined by a severity scoring system. Anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed using the hospital anxiety and depression score. Blood oxygen level-dependent signals were measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging during expectation and delivery of high (45 mmHg) and low (15 mmHg) intensity rectal distensions. Perception thresholds to rectal distension were determined in the scanner. Brain imaging data were compared among 18 normosensitive and 15 hypersensitivepatients with IBS and 18 controls. Results were reported significant if peak P-values were ≤.05, with family-wise error correction in regions of interest. RESULTS: The subgroups of patients with IBS were similar in age, symptom duration, psychological symptoms, and IBS symptom severity. Although brain responses to distension were similar between normosensitive patients and controls, hypersensitivepatients with IBShad greater activation of insula and reduced deactivation in pregenual anterior cingulate cortex during noxious rectal distensions, compared to controls and normosensitive patients with IBS. During expectation of rectal distension, normosensitive patients with IBShad more activation in right hippocampus than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similarities in symptoms, hyper- and normosensitive patients with IBS differ in cerebral responses to standardized rectal distensions and their expectation, consistent with differences in ascending visceral afferent input. Copyright Â
Authors: Tania Singer; Ben Seymour; John O'Doherty; Holger Kaube; Raymond J Dolan; Chris D Frith Journal: Science Date: 2004-02-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Elspeth Guthrie; Jo Barlow; Lakshmi Fernandes; Joy Ratcliffe; Nicholas Read; David G Thompson; Barbara Tomenson; Francis Creed Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: J S Labus; R Bolus; L Chang; I Wiklund; J Naesdal; E A Mayer; B D Naliboff Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Jennifer S Labus; Catherine S Hubbard; Joshua Bueller; Bahar Ebrat; Kirsten Tillisch; Michelle Chen; Jean Stains; George E Dukes; Dennis L Kelleher; Bruce D Naliboff; Michael Fanselow; Emeran A Mayer Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Lizbeth J Ayoub; Alexander Barnett; Aziliz Leboucher; Mitchell Golosky; Mary Pat McAndrews; David A Seminowicz; Massieh Moayedi Journal: Pain Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Jeannie S Huang; Laura Terrones; Alan N Simmons; Walter Kaye; Irina Strigo Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Yuko M Komesu; Rebecca G Rogers; Robert E Sapien; Ronald M Schrader; Timothy Simmerman-Sierra; Andrew R Mayer; Loren H Ketai Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 2.894