Literature DB >> 22107257

Developmental differences in sensory decision making involved in deciding to try a novel fruit.

Terence M Dovey1, Victoria K Aldridge, Wendy Dignan, Paul A Staples, E Leigh Gibson, Jason C G Halford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This research compared sensory processing and personality traits involved in deciding to try a novel fruit (guava) in adults and children.
DESIGN: The research employed an age, sex, and food neophobia matched between-participant design to examine sensory decision making in choosing to eat a novel fruit.
METHODS: Forty-four adults (Study 1) and 68 children (Study 2) took part. In each study, participants were separated into two groups to investigate whether prior assessment of a familiar and liked fruit (apple) that shares similar visual characteristics to the target novel fruit (guava) increased the likelihood that an individual would decide to try it. All participants completed appetitive and familiarity ratings by sensory stages: vision, smell, and touch, prior to trying (tasting) the fruit. Participants (or their parents) also completed the general and food neophobia scales and adults also completed the sensation-seeking scale.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight adults (64%) tried the guava and 16 did not (36%). In the second study, 22 children decided not to try the novel fruit (32%). Significant predictors of whether the adult tried the target fruit were Thrill and Adventure Seeking, Experience Seeking, General Neophobia, and 'appealing to touch'. In children, Food Neophobia, concurrent presentation of a familiar fruit alongside the target and visual assessment of the target predicted decision to try the novel fruit.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that touch is pertinent to adults' decision to try a novel fruit, whereas visual cues appear to be more important for children. ©2011 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22107257     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02036.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  8 in total

1.  Association between tactile over-responsivity and vegetable consumption early in the introduction of solid foods and its variation with age.

Authors:  Helen Coulthard; Gillian Harris; Anna Fogel
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The lived experience of parenting a child with sensory sensitivity and picky eating.

Authors:  Louise Cunliffe; Helen Coulthard; Iain R Williamson
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.660

3.  Superior orthonasal but not retronasal olfactory skills in congenital blindness.

Authors:  Lea Gagnon; Abd Rahman Alaoui Ismaili; Maurice Ptito; Ron Kupers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Variation of Adolescent Snack Food Choices and Preferences along a Continuum of Processing Levels: The Case of Apples.

Authors:  Elizabeth Svisco; Carmen Byker Shanks; Selena Ahmed; Katie Bark
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-02-01

5.  Towards Sustainable Diets: Understanding the Cognitive Mechanism of Consumer Acceptance of Biofortified Foods and the Role of Nutrition Information.

Authors:  Amar Razzaq; Yifan Tang; Ping Qing
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Optimising Repeated Exposure: Determining Optimal Stimulus Shape for Introducing a Novel Vegetable among Children.

Authors:  Klelia Karagiannaki; Christian Ritz; Ditte Søbye Andreasen; Raphaela Achtelik; Per Møller; Helene Hausner; Annemarie Olsen
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-21

7.  Understanding Blood versus Blond Orange Consumption: A Cross-Cultural Study in Four Countries.

Authors:  Adrián Giménez-Sanchis; Kui Zhong; Aurora Pintor; Vittorio Farina; Cristina Besada
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-09-02

8.  Effects of varying the standard deviation of the luminance on the appearance of food, flavour expectations, and taste/flavour perception.

Authors:  Junya Ueda; Charles Spence; Katsunori Okajima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.