Literature DB >> 33525742

Towards Sustainable Diets: Understanding the Cognitive Mechanism of Consumer Acceptance of Biofortified Foods and the Role of Nutrition Information.

Amar Razzaq1, Yifan Tang1, Ping Qing1.   

Abstract

Micronutrient malnutrition, also known as hidden hunger, continues to affect more than 2 billion people globally. Biofortification, which is a process of breeding staple crops with improved micronutrient contents such as vitamin A, iron, and zinc, offers a cost-effective and sustainable solution in reducing hidden hunger. However, the success of these foods depends on consumer acceptance. In contrast to previous studies, this research focuses on the mechanism of consumer acceptance of biofortified crops that undergo physical changes (i.e., changes in appearance) after biofortification. We use data on 473 Chinese consumers collected through online surveys to examine their purchase intentions for biofortified foods that have visible (vs. invisible) nutrition traits. Using two online surveys, we conduct two studies to reveal the mechanism and antecedents of consumer acceptance of different biofortified foods. In Study 1, we find that consumer purchase intentions vary depending upon the visibility of nutrition traits in biofortified foods. Specifically, consumers exhibit a nutrition-related food neophobia (NFN) regardless of visibility of the nutrition trait in biofortified foods; and a sensory-affective food neophobia (SFN) which is only pronounced when the nutrition trait in biofortified foods is visible. The results of the mediation analysis show that for both types of biofortified foods, NFN mediates consumers' purchasing intentions. For foods that involve visible changes after biofortification, SFN acts as an additional mediator of consumer purchase intentions. Using ordered logistic regression analysis, we find that both food neophobias have a negative impact on consumer acceptance of biofortified foods. The results of Study 2 confirm our findings and further show that nutrition information moderates the mediation of NFN and SFN, i.e., the negative impact of NFN and SFN on purchase intentions can be reduced by providing nutrition information to consumers. The results of this study have several theoretical and practical implications and are of interest to stakeholders and marketers in the promotion of biofortified foods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofortified foods; consumer behavior; micronutrient malnutrition; nutrition information; nutrition traits in food; ordered logistic regression; purchase intentions; sustainable diets

Year:  2021        PMID: 33525742      PMCID: PMC7908173          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  21 in total

1.  Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods.

Authors:  K Roininen; L Lähteenmäki; H Tuorila
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  The brain tracks the energetic value in food images.

Authors:  Ulrike Toepel; Jean-François Knebel; Julie Hudry; Johannes le Coutre; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Correlates of human food neophobia.

Authors:  P Pliner; L Lahteenmaki; H Tuorila
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Healthy dietary practices among European students.

Authors:  J Wardle; A Steptoe; F Bellisle; B Davou; K Reschke; R Lappalainen; M Fredrikson
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 5.  Deciphering the consumer behaviour facets of functional foods: A literature review.

Authors:  Navdeep Kaur; Devinder Pal Singh
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  French consumers' perceptions of nutrition and health claims: A psychosocial-anthropological approach.

Authors:  Estelle Masson; Gervaise Debucquet; Claude Fischler; Mohamed Merdji
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  FAO, IFAD, and WFP. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015: Meeting the 2015 International Hunger Targets: Taking Stock of Uneven Progress. Rome: FAO, 2015.

Authors:  Shelley McGuire
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 8.  Food neophobia and 'picky/fussy' eating in children: a review.

Authors:  Terence M Dovey; Paul A Staples; E Leigh Gibson; Jason C G Halford
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Consumer fears and familiarity of processed food. The value of information provided by the FTNS.

Authors:  Fabio Verneau; Francesco Caracciolo; Adele Coppola; Pasquale Lombardi
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda.

Authors:  Alan de Brauw; Patrick Eozenou; Daniel O Gilligan; Christine Hotz; Neha Kumar; J V Meenakshi
Journal:  Am J Agric Econ       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.