| Literature DB >> 22104611 |
Tonino Bombardini1, Rosa Sicari, Elisabetta Bianchini, Eugenio Picano.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The degree of pulmonary hypertension is not independently related to the severity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction but is frequently associated with diastolic filling abnormalities. The aim of this study was to assess diastolic times at increasing heart rates in normal and in patients with and without abnormal exercise-induced increase in pulmonary artery pressure (PASP).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22104611 PMCID: PMC3268730 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-9-36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Clinical study population findings
| Abnormal exercise PASP | Normal exercise PASP | P = | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N of pts | 14 | 95 | |
| Dilated cardiomyopathy | 1 (7%) | 8 (8.5%) | NS |
| Aortic stenosis, moderate | 3 (21%) | 4 (4.2%) | < 0.05 |
| Aortic regurgitation, moderate | 0 | 2 (2.1%) | NS |
| Mitral stenosis, moderate | 1 (7%) | 0 | NS |
| Mitral regurgitation, moderate | 4 (29%) | 3 (3.2%) | < 0.05 |
| Known coronary artery disease | 3 (21%) | 45 (47.4%) | < 0.05 |
| Prior myocardial infarction | 1 (7%) | 35 (37.6%) | < 0.05 |
| Prior percutaneous coronary intervention | 2 (14%) | 32 (33.7%) | NS |
| Arterial hypertension | 7 (50%) | 46 (48.4%) | NS |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 0 | 18 (18.9%) | < 0.05 |
| Diabetes | 1 (7%) | 20 (22.7%) | NS |
| Effort dyspnea | 10 (77%) | 39 (41%) | < 0.05 |
| Left bundle branch block | 3 (21%) | 12 (12.6%) | NS |
| Right bundle branch block | 0 | 8 (8.5%) | NS |
| Therapy at the time of test | |||
| β-blockers | 7 (50%) | 40 (42.1%) | NS |
| Calcium antagonists | 3 (21%) | 26 (27.4%) | NS |
| Nitrates | 1 (7%) | 17 (18.3%) | NS |
| ACE inhibitors | 5 (36%) | 34 (36.6%) | NS |
| Diuretics | 4 (29%) | 13 (13.7%) | NS |
| At least one medication | 10 (71%) | 69 (72.6%) | NS |
Data presented number (%) of patients.
PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure
Rest and stress data
| Patients, abnormal exercise PASP | Patients, normal exercise PASP | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N of patients | 14 | 95 | 16 |
| Age (years) | 63 ± 12* | 60 ± 12 Δ | 35 ± 9 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 8/6 | 70/25 | 14/2 |
| Left ventricular mass index (g/m2) | 112 ± 17 | 107 ± 30 | 99 ± 24 |
| Heart rate rest (bpm) | 65 ± 15 | 73 ± 15 | 77 ± 15 |
| Heart rate peak (bpm) | 118 ± 22* | 123 ± 21 Δ | 163 ± 11 |
| Systolic blood pressure rest (mmHg) | 128 ± 21 | 135 ± 20 | 126 ± 13 |
| Systolic blood pressure peak (mmHg) | 177 ± 21 | 186 ± 24 | 192 ± 27 |
| Diastolic blood pressure rest (mmHg) | 70 ± 10 | 75 ± 12 | 72 ± 10 |
| Diastolic blood pressure peak (mmHg) | 88 ± 11 | 94 ± 12 | 89 ± 13 |
| Pulmonary artery systolic pressure rest (mmHg) | 35 ± 4§ | 30 ± 5 Δ | 25 ± 4 |
| Pulmonary artery systolic pressure peak (mmHg) | 62 ± 12§ | 38 ± 7 Δ | 32 ± 6 |
| LV end-diastolic volume index rest (mL/m2) | 55 ± 23 | 52 ± 18 | 51 ± 13 |
| Δ LV end-diastolic volume index (rest-peak, mL/m2) | -5 ± 15 | -5 ± 9 | -10 ± 11 |
| LV end-systolic volume index rest (mL/m2) | 22 ± 10 | 22 ± 14 | 21 ± 9 |
| Δ LV end-systolic volume index (rest-peak, mL/m2) | -2 ± 6* | -4 ± 7 Δ | -10 ± 5 |
| LV ejection fraction % rest | 57 ± 14 | 57 ± 11 | 60 ± 7 |
| Δ LV ejection fraction % (rest-peak) | 1 ± 8* | 5 ± 11 Δ | 13 ± 9 |
| Wall motion score index rest | 1.12 ± 0.32 | 1.19 ± 0.37 Δ | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
| Systolic pressure/End-systolic volume index rest (mmHg/mL/m2) | 8.6 ± 7.8 | 8.3 ± 5.4 | 7.1 ± 3.1 |
| Δ Systolic pressure/End-systolic volume index (rest-peak, mmHg/mL/m2) | 4.2 ± 5* | 7.4 ± 7.9 Δ | 14.6 ± 11.1 |
| Arterial elastance index rest (mmHg/mL/m2) | 4.3 ± 1.7 | 4.6 ± 1.5 | 4 ± 0.9 |
| Δ Arterial elastance index (rest-peak, mmHg/mL/m2) | 1.5 ± 1.8 | 1.7 ± 1.6 | 2.4 ± 2 |
| Ventricular/arterial coupling rest (ratio) | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 1.6 ± 0.5 |
| Δ Ventricular/arterial coupling (rest-peak) | 0.4 ± 1.1 | 0.7 ± 1.3 | 1.6 ± 1.8 |
| Cardiac index rest (L/min/m2) | 1.99 ± 0.74 | 2.01 ± 0.70 | 2.19 ± 0.51 |
| Δ Cardiac index (rest-peak, L/min/m2) | 1.36 ± 0.94* | 1.44 ± 0.95 Δ | 2.58 ± 1.77 |
| Force rest ( | 12.6 ± 10 | 9.7 ± 5.3 Δ | 16.6 ± 7.4 |
| Δ Force (rest-peak, | 21.4 ± 21.7* | 22.5 ± 21.4 Δ | 53.1 ± 33 |
| 415 ± 30 § | 438 ± 25 Δ | 470 ± 29 | |
| Diastolic time at 100 bpm (msec) | 304 ± 19 § | 323 ± 21 Δ | 350 ± 22 |
| Diastolic time at 110 bpm (msec) | 264 ± 16 § | 286 ± 21 Δ | 306 ± 21 |
| 335 ± 30 § | 312 ± 25 Δ | 280 ± 29 | |
| Systolic time at 100 bpm (msec) | 303 ± 19 § | 276 ± 21 Δ | 250 ± 22 |
| Systolic time at 110 bpm (msec) | 281 ± 16 § | 259 ± 21 Δ | 239 ± 21 |
| 1.26 ± 0.20 § | 1.42 ± 0.20 Δ | 1.76 ± 0.34 | |
| Diastolic/systolic time ratio at 100 bpm | 1.01 ± 0.12 § | 1.18 ± 0.17 Δ | 1.42 ± 0.22 |
| Diastolic/systolic time ratio at 110 bpm | 0.95 ± 0.11 § | 1.12 ± 0.17 Δ | 1.29 ± 0.20 |
| Diastolic/systolic time ratio at recovery, 100 bpm | 1.24 ± 0.28 * | 1.48 ± 0.28 Δ | 1.75 ± 0.41 |
§ = significant differences between abnormal stress PASP patients vs. both normal stress PASP patients and Controls; ‡ = significant differences between abnormal stress PASP patients vs. normal stress PASP patients; * = significant differences between abnormal stress PASP patients vs. Controls. Δ = significant differences between normal stress PASP patients vs. Controls.
g = 9.8 m/sec2; PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure
Figure 1Boxplots of diastolic/systolic time ratios at increasing heart rates (HR, bpm) in patients with (left panel) vs patients without (middle panel) exercise-induced increase in pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Right panel, controls. At intermediate (100 bpm) heart rates an abnormal (< 1) diastolic/systolic time ratio was found in 0/16 (0%) controls, in 7/14 (50%) patients with and 12/93 (13%) patients without abnormal exercise-induced increase in pulmonary artery pressure, p < 0.05 between groups.
Figure 2Correlation between diastolic time (mesc) during exercise and peak stress HR (bpm) in controls (triangles), in patients with (full circles) and without (empty circles) abnormal exercise-induced increase in pulmonary artery systolic pressure. The total cardiac cycle duration is algebraically dependent on the heart rate [= 60,000 msec/heart rate] with fixed values totally independent from the increasing heart rate stress type. At 100 bpm heart rate the cardiac cycle duration is = 600 msec. A longer diastolic time fraction improves ventricular filling and coronary perfusion time.