BACKGROUND: Propofol produces its major actions via γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors. At low concentrations, propofol enhances agonist-stimulated GABA(A) receptor activity, and high propofol concentrations directly activate receptors. Etomidate produces similar effects, and there is convincing evidence that a single class of etomidate sites mediate both agonist modulation and direct GABA(A) receptor activation. It is unknown if the propofol binding site(s) on GABA(A) receptors that modulate agonist-induced activity also mediate direct activation. METHODS: GABA(A) α1β2γ2L receptors were heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes and activity was quantified using voltage clamp electrophysiology. We tested whether propofol and etomidate display the same linkage between agonist modulation and direct activation of GABA(A) receptors by identifying equiefficacious drug solutions for direct activation. We then determined whether these drug solutions produce equal modulation of GABA-induced receptor activity. We also measured propofol-dependent direct activation and modulation of low GABA responses. Allosteric coagonist models similar to that established for etomidate, but with variable numbers of propofol sites, were fitted to combined data. RESULTS: Solutions of 19 μM propofol and 10 μM etomidate were found to equally activate GABA(A) receptors. These two drug solutions also produced indistinguishable modulation of GABA-induced receptor activity. Combined electrophysiological data behaved in a manner consistent with allosteric coagonist models with more than one propofol site. The best fit was observed when the model assumed three equivalent propofol sites. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that propofol, like etomidate, acts at GABA(A) receptor sites mediating both GABA modulation and direct activation.
BACKGROUND:Propofol produces its major actions via γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors. At low concentrations, propofol enhances agonist-stimulated GABA(A) receptor activity, and high propofol concentrations directly activate receptors. Etomidate produces similar effects, and there is convincing evidence that a single class of etomidate sites mediate both agonist modulation and direct GABA(A) receptor activation. It is unknown if the propofol binding site(s) on GABA(A) receptors that modulate agonist-induced activity also mediate direct activation. METHODS:GABA(A) α1β2γ2L receptors were heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes and activity was quantified using voltage clamp electrophysiology. We tested whether propofol and etomidate display the same linkage between agonist modulation and direct activation of GABA(A) receptors by identifying equiefficacious drug solutions for direct activation. We then determined whether these drug solutions produce equal modulation of GABA-induced receptor activity. We also measured propofol-dependent direct activation and modulation of low GABA responses. Allosteric coagonist models similar to that established for etomidate, but with variable numbers of propofol sites, were fitted to combined data. RESULTS: Solutions of 19 μM propofol and 10 μM etomidate were found to equally activate GABA(A) receptors. These two drug solutions also produced indistinguishable modulation of GABA-induced receptor activity. Combined electrophysiological data behaved in a manner consistent with allosteric coagonist models with more than one propofol site. The best fit was observed when the model assumed three equivalent propofol sites. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that propofol, like etomidate, acts at GABA(A) receptor sites mediating both GABA modulation and direct activation.
Authors: S Shaukat Husain; Michael R Ziebell; Dirk Ruesch; Filbert Hong; Enrique Arevalo; Jonathan A Kosterlitz; Richard W Olsen; Stuart A Forman; Jonathan B Cohen; Keith W Miller Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Michael A Hall; Jin Xi; Chong Lor; Shuiping Dai; Robert Pearce; William P Dailey; Roderic G Eckenhoff Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Daniel J Shin; Allison L Germann; Douglas F Covey; Joe Henry Steinbach; Gustav Akk Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Celena Ma; Ervin Pejo; Megan McGrath; Selwyn S Jayakar; Xiaojuan Zhou; Keith W Miller; Jonathan B Cohen; Douglas E Raines Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: David C Chiara; Selwyn S Jayakar; Xiaojuan Zhou; Xi Zhang; Pavel Y Savechenkov; Karol S Bruzik; Keith W Miller; Jonathan B Cohen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 5.157