Literature DB >> 22104045

Designing research with hospice and palliative care populations.

Ashley M Wohleber1, Daniel S McKitrick, Shawn E Davis.   

Abstract

Research in palliative care and hospice populations is important for improving quality of care, quality of life, and provider understanding of individuals at the end of life. However, this research involves many potential challenges. This review seeks to inform and assist researchers targeting to design studies targeting hospice and palliative care patients by presenting a thorough review of the published literature. This review covers English-language articles published from 1990 through 2009 listed in the PsycInfo, Medline, or CINAHL research databases under relevant keywords. Articles on pediatric hospice were not included. Issues discussed include study design, informed consent, and recruitment for participants. Synthesized recommendations for researchers in these populations are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22104045     DOI: 10.1177/1049909111427139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  9 in total

1.  The Social Convoy for Family Caregivers Over the Course of Hospice.

Authors:  David L Albright; Karla Washington; Debra Parker-Oliver; Alexandria Lewis; Robin L Kruse; George Demiris
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Lessons from the field: challenges in accruing hospice heart failure patients to intervention research.

Authors:  Cheryl H Zambroski; Harleah Buck; Christopher M Garrison; Susan C McMillan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Processes of consent in research for adults with impaired mental capacity nearing the end of life: systematic review and transparent expert consultation (MORECare_Capacity statement).

Authors:  C J Evans; E Yorganci; P Lewis; J Koffman; K Stone; I Tunnard; B Wee; W Bernal; M Hotopf; I J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Conducting the ACTIVE randomized trial in hospice care: keys to success.

Authors:  Robin L Kruse; Debra Parker Oliver; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; George Demiris
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Perceived Benefits and Burdens of Participation for Caregivers of Cancer Patients in Hospice Clinical Trials: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; Jacquelyn J Benson; Connie Ulrich; Karla T Washington; Abigail J Rolbiecki; Patrick White; Jamie B Smith; Christina Lero; Olivia J Landon; George Demiris
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.576

6.  A mixed-methods pilot study of 'LIFEView' audiovisual technology: Virtual travel to support well-being and quality of life in palliative and end-of-life care patients.

Authors:  Monisha Kabir; Jill L Rice; Shirley H Bush; Peter G Lawlor; Colleen Webber; Pamela A Grassau; Bahareh Ghaedi; Misha Dhuper; Rebekah Hackbusch
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 7.  Dying persons' perspectives on, or experiences of, participating in research: An integrative review.

Authors:  Melissa J Bloomer; Alison M Hutchinson; Laura Brooks; Mari Botti
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Data analysis methods for assessing palliative care interventions in one-group pre-post studies.

Authors:  Takeshi Ioroi; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Akihiro Sakashita; Yuki Miki; Kanako Ohtagaki; Yuka Fujiwara; Yuko Utsubo; Yoshihiro Nishimura; Midori Hirai
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2015-11-15

9.  Use of parecoxib by continuous subcutaneous infusion for cancer pain in a hospice population.

Authors:  Peter Armstrong; Pauline Wilkinson; Noleen K McCorry
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.568

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.