Literature DB >> 22102578

COLT-Cancer: functional genetic screening resource for essential genes in human cancer cell lines.

Judice L Y Koh1, Kevin R Brown, Azin Sayad, Dahlia Kasimer, Troy Ketela, Jason Moffat.   

Abstract

Genome-wide pooled shRNA screens enable global identification of the genes essential for cancer cell survival and proliferation and provide a 'functional genetic' map of human cancer to complement genomic studies. Using a lentiviral shRNA library targeting approximately 16,000 human genes and a newly developed scoring approach, we identified essential gene profiles in more than 70 breast, pancreatic and ovarian cancer cell lines. We developed a web-accessible database system for capturing information from each step in our standardized screening pipeline and a gene-centric search tool for exploring shRNA activities within a given cell line or across multiple cell lines. The database consists of a laboratory information and management system for tracking each step of a pooled shRNA screen as well as a web interface for querying and visualization of shRNA and gene-level performance across multiple cancer cell lines. COLT-Cancer Version 1.0 is currently accessible at http://colt.ccbr.utoronto.ca/cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22102578      PMCID: PMC3245009          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, gene silencing through RNA interference (RNAi) technology has emerged as a powerful tool for deciphering the mechanistic details of biological processes in higher eukaryotes. RNAi was first exploited for systematic functional studies in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster (1,2), and is now also widely used for selective suppression of gene expression in mammalian cells (3,4). More recently, viral-based pooled shRNA screening methods have been developed and applied in functional genetic screens to identify genes that are essential for cancer cell proliferation with the goal of identifying therapeutic targets (5–7). We have developed a standard operating procedure for carrying out large-scale pooled shRNA screens and are systematically looking for essential genes using cancer cell lines from various tumor types including breast, ovarian and pancreatic (Marcotte et al., submitted for publication). We are using a pooled subset of the human TRC collection that includes 78 432 shRNAs targeting approximately 16 000 human genes (5,8) to develop essential gene profiles across a large number of cancer cell lines (R. Marcotte, submitted for publication). To streamline the process from data generation to public user access of our cancer cell line screening results, we developed a web-accessible database system for processing, analyzing and retrieving data from the pooled screens. The COLT-Cancer database system is comprised of: (i) a laboratory information and management system (LIMS) for automation of basic microarray functions such as chip signal extraction, background correction, normalization and quality metric generation; (ii) an automated routine for generating hairpin-level and gene-level essentiality scores; and (iii) a web interface at http://colt.ccbr.utoronto.ca/cancer that enables researchers to query, visualize and compare essential genes across multiple cancer cell lines. Many RNAi screens in mammalian cells have been conducted in academic and industry labs and have yielded novel insight into genes that are essential for cancer cell proliferation. Some of the resulting data is available to the research community through a number of collation efforts, including RNAiDB (9), GenomeRNAi (10) and FLIGHT database (11). These databases support integrative visualization and analysis of RNAi data with other data such as gene annotations, shRNA sequence annotations and corresponding knockout efficiency and genomic information. In addition, several RNAi-based tools/databases also focus on providing searchable shRNA and siRNA constructs, such as RNAi Codex (12), E-RNAi (13), the RNAi Consortium (TRC) library database (http://www.broadinstitute.org/rnai/public/) and the Cancer Genome Anatomy Project (CGAP) shRNA clone library (http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/RNAi/RNAi2). The COLT-Cancer was designed with a unique focus to facilitate functional comparison of essential gene profiles across a compendium of cancer cell lines and integrate this information with structural genomic data from large cancer genome sequencing efforts to uncover vulnerabilities that can be used to develop better prognostics and therapeutics (Marcotte et al., submitted for publication).

DATABASE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTENT

System architecture

COLT-Cancer is deployed on a back-end DB2 relational database management system. The DB2 database serves as central storage for data and images generated continuously from our automated computational pipeline for processing and analyzing RNAi pooled screens. As such, it was designed with the objective of achieving query and storage efficiency for large quantities of microarray images, signal intensity measurements, annotations of genes and shRNA reagents, genomic information, and other metadata and contains more than 200 relational tables (database schema available at COLT-Cancer online documentation). The COLT system is hosted on 2 IBM servers; one that functions as a database server and the other as a web server to facilitate querying, data downloading and data visualization through the COLT-Cancer websites. The web interfaces of COLT-Cancer were developed using a combination of HTML, CGI Perl, DB2/Perl application programming interface, cascading style sheets and Javascript for easy navigation. Graphical plots are generated on-the-fly using R plotting functions.

Microarray LIMS system

At the back-end of COLT is a LIMS to support basic tasks central to our standard operating procedures such as signal extraction, background correction, normalization and quality metric generation (Figure 1a). The data extraction and processing pipeline is fully automated, and is triggered upon receipt of a .CEL file. Raw microarray data is extracted and background corrected using Affymetrix Power Tools (APT) v1.12.0 (http://www.affymetrix.com). There are 33 894 features on the Gene Modulation Array Platform (GMAP) used for background correction (8). Replicate GMAP arrays are normalized using Cyclic Loess based on the ‘MA-plot’ of pairs of arrays and performed via the ‘affy’ R package (14). In general, the GCbg-correction increases differentiation between feature signals from the pooled and background probes, while normalization reduces variance between replicates (Figure 1b). To allow access to raw and normalized shRNA, spike-in and control features on all microarrays for quality control checks and analyses beyond the database functions, a web interface was developed to provide authenticated access to internal and external end-users. For published experiments, these are accessible through the ‘COLT LIMS’ link on COLT-Cancer.
Figure 1.

(a) Microarray data extraction and processing pipeline. (b) Distribution of a sample experiment from COLT-Cancer. GCbg-correction increases differentiation between feature signals from the pooled and background probes, while normalization reduces variance between replicates.

(a) Microarray data extraction and processing pipeline. (b) Distribution of a sample experiment from COLT-Cancer. GCbg-correction increases differentiation between feature signals from the pooled and background probes, while normalization reduces variance between replicates.

Quantifying drop-out rates of shRNA and target genes

To score screening data, shRNA-level shARP (shRNA Activity Ranking Profile) and gene-level GARP (Gene Activity Rank Profile) scores were computed across time points in each experiment. Details of the scoring methods are described elsewhere (Marcotte et al., submitted for publication; and in online documentation of website). Simply, the average of the two lowest shARP scores for a given gene is used to calculate the GARP score for that gene. The lower the GARP score for a given cell line, the more essential is the gene in that particular cell line. P-values are calculated from permutation testing of 1000 random scores, as a measure of the statistical ‘confidence’ of the GARP score. The GARP, GARP P-values, and shARP scores are available for download on COLT-Cancer.

Integration with external data sources

To add contextual information to shRNA screen scoring results, COLT-Cancer provides specific types of annotations for each gene. These annotations include: cancer-associated genes, known activity as a House-keeping (HK) protein, predicted or known localization to the cell surface, associations with NCI curated pathways and copy number abberation (CNA) data from a number of breast and pancreatic tumor samples. HK genes are vital for maintaining the biological ‘well-being’ of cells under various conditions, and are therefore ubiquitously expressed across tissues and cell types and are evolutionally more conserved (15,16). Previous studies have shown that HK genes are highly associated with essentiality, and with somatic cancer and other diseases (17,18), thus they can be used to benchmark the essentiality of the gene from our experiments against relevance to HK functions and oncogenesis. The known HK genes in COLT-Cancer were obtained from Tu et al. (18). Not all genes required for survival in cancer cells are directly associated with oncogenesis. On the other hand, comprehensive knowledge of gene essentiality may unravel novel drivers of cell survival. To help dissect known cancer-associated essential genes from essential genes of unknown significance, we integrated gene–cancer associations from the Cancer Gene Consensus (CGC, http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP; 19). The CGC currently catalogs 291 genes that show somatic and/or germline mutations in cancer. Additionally, we integrated curated cancer-associated pathways from the Pathway Interaction Database (PID) (20). Proteins located on the cell surface are of interest for identifying putative antibody-based tumor targets. Two ‘surfaceome’ data sets—a comprehensive set of 3702 genes predicted from their transmembrane domain and gene ontology annotations using bioinformatic approaches (21), and a larger curated set of surfaceome genes (R.J. Williams and J. Dennis, personal communication). These data sets are downloaded on regular basis, and reformatted into the data model, in order to speed up web queries. CNAs are known to be characteristics of certain cancers, and may potentially serve as a benchmark for identifying novel oncogenes from the top-ranked essential genes in COLT-Cancer. All cell line copy number data were provided by the Cancer Genome Project group at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and can be obtained from http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/CellLines/. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, 22) was used for ovarian primary tumor copy number data. The University Hospital Ullevål (Ull) cohort breast samples were used for breast (23). For pancreatic tumor data, we used the data published by Harada et al. (24). These samples were processed using the Aroma.CN package (25,26), including Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Robust Multi-Array Analysis (SNP-RMA, 27) normalization. In all cases, data was segmented using Circular Binary Segmentation (CBS, 28) and a Log-R ratio threshold of 0.33 was used to call copy number gain.

DATABASE UTILITY

Browse cell lines and genes

COLT-Cancer currently hosts 72 published human cancer cell lines. Complete lists of the cell lines and genes are alphabetically ordered by their common names and available to users through the ‘List cell-lines’ and ‘List all genes’ functions. They can also be independently searched using various options including name, reference sequence, gene IDs and gene descriptions. Cell line information also include short-tandem repeat profiles and are linked to ATCC Cell Biology Collection.

Gene-centric queries across cell lines

Users can search for genes-of-interest across selected tumor types or subtypes. A gene-centric search result returns the GARP scores and P-values of the best matching gene across selected screens, along with externally integrated annotations of the gene (HK, CGC, surfaceome, among others). End-users can choose to download the scores or evaluate similarities amongst genes or cell lines through hierarchical clustering of either GARP scores or P-values (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

An example of a hierarchically clustered heatmap generated in COLT-Cancer from the GARP P-values of 4 genes across all cancer cell lines.

An example of a hierarchically clustered heatmap generated in COLT-Cancer from the GARP P-values of 4 genes across all cancer cell lines.

Cross cell-line comparisons

Web-based functions are provided to facilitate functional comparisons across studies, which are critical for understanding the common and discriminating machineries in different cancer cell lines. For instance, the ‘Cross cell-line search’ option on COLT-Cancer allows users to query, visualize and compare genes that are commonly essential across multiple tumor types or within the same tumor type in a summarized matrix view (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

An example use case in COLT-Cancer to visualize common essential genes across breast (red), ovarian (yellow) and pancreatic (orange) cell lines.

An example use case in COLT-Cancer to visualize common essential genes across breast (red), ovarian (yellow) and pancreatic (orange) cell lines.

Essentiality and CNA plot

These query plots provide an integrated representation of essentiality and CNA data for contiguous genes within a genomic region, across three tumor types including breast, ovarian and pancreatic. They allow users to examine the degree of essentiality for a given gene within a specified genomic region, and how the degree of essentiality is distributed across breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer cell lines. Bars above the axis represent the fraction of all screens in which a given gene had an essentiality score in the top 5%, by GARP. Bars below the axis represent the fraction of samples, derived from literature-curated data, in which the gene is amplified in either cell lines or patient tumors.

COLT LIMS

Signal features, along with descriptions of the gene targeted by the shRNA sequence can be downloaded into tab-delimited files. On-the-fly visualization, basic statistical analysis, and quality metrics are integrated, allowing end-users to assess the quality of the screens. For example, the ‘Distribution plot’ presents a histogram-like view of all shRNA signals from selected chips in an experiment, allowing the user to assess replicate reproducibility, and provides a visual approximation of the number hairpins dropping out of the screen. The ‘Correlation plot’ displays the Spearman correlation between all pairs of selected chips (Figure 4), providing another assessment of screen quality and replicate reproducibility.
Figure 4.

(a) A plot generated on-the-fly from COLT-LIMS shows the distribution/histogram of the signals from each chip in a screen. (b) Spearman correlations between pairs of microarrays in a sample screen.

(a) A plot generated on-the-fly from COLT-LIMS shows the distribution/histogram of the signals from each chip in a screen. (b) Spearman correlations between pairs of microarrays in a sample screen.

Download

COLT-Cancer supports downloading of user-specified subsets or the full set of essentiality GARP scores and corresponding P-values in tab-delimited files. Microarray images can be downloaded as lower resolution JPEG files.

Future developments

COLT-Cancer was developed with the intent to be an active resource for quantitative gene essentiality measurements of human cancer cells. There are mechanisms for future regular updates of experimental results through the COLT LIMS pipeline. Future additions to the system aim at further automating the updating processes to enable more frequent updates of external data sources. Although COLT-Cancer currently contains only locally generated pooled shRNA screening data, further work will involve integrating data types from other sources. Future versions of COLT-Cancer also aim to provide new visualization tools such as integrating our results into a genome viewer to enrich COLT-Cancer as a central resource for cancer research, assisting experimentalists in the generation of testable hypotheses.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a web database referred to as COLT-Cancer, which provides users an integrative platform to browse, query and analyze high-quality pooled shRNA screening data from a deep repository of functional genetic screens across different tumor types and genetic backgrounds. The COLT-Cancer website is a valuable resource to identify genetic vulnerabilities for cancer cell proliferation that may serve as useful prognostic or therapeutic targets.

FUNDING

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research and Terry Fox Research Institute through the Selective Therapies Program (J.M.); the Canadian Institutes for Health Research #178975 (J.M.); the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (J.M.); and the Ontario Research Fund (J.M.). J.M. holds a CIHR New Investigator Award. Funding for open access charge: OICR/TFRI Selective Therapies Program. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
  25 in total

1.  An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells.

Authors:  S M Hammond; E Bernstein; D Beach; G J Hannon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  RNAiDB and PhenoBlast: web tools for genome-wide phenotypic mapping projects.

Authors:  Kristin C Gunsalus; Wan-Chen Yueh; Philip MacMenamin; Fabio Piano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  affy--analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level.

Authors:  Laurent Gautier; Leslie Cope; Benjamin M Bolstad; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data.

Authors:  Adam B Olshen; E S Venkatraman; Robert Lucito; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  A Fire; S Xu; M K Montgomery; S A Kostas; S E Driver; C C Mello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genomic architecture characterizes tumor progression paths and fate in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hege G Russnes; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Alexander Krasnitz; Pär Lundin; Bjørn Naume; Therese Sørlie; Elin Borgen; Inga H Rye; Anita Langerød; Suet-Feung Chin; Andrew E Teschendorff; Philip J Stephens; Susanne Månér; Ellen Schlichting; Lars O Baumbusch; Rolf Kåresen; Michael P Stratton; Michael Wigler; Carlos Caldas; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Thijn R Brummelkamp; René Bernards; Reuven Agami
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes.

Authors:  Liqing Zhang; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 9.  A census of human cancer genes.

Authors:  P Andrew Futreal; Lachlan Coin; Mhairi Marshall; Thomas Down; Timothy Hubbard; Richard Wooster; Nazneen Rahman; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  A comprehensive platform for highly multiplexed mammalian functional genetic screens.

Authors:  Troy Ketela; Lawrence E Heisler; Kevin R Brown; Ron Ammar; Dahlia Kasimer; Anuradha Surendra; Elke Ericson; Kim Blakely; Dina Karamboulas; Andrew M Smith; Tanja Durbic; Anthony Arnoldo; Kahlin Cheung-Ong; Judice L Y Koh; Shuba Gopal; Glenn S Cowley; Xiaoping Yang; Jennifer K Grenier; Guri Giaever; David E Root; Jason Moffat; Corey Nislow
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  33 in total

1.  An integrated network platform for contextual prioritization of drugs and pathways.

Authors:  Aldo Segura-Cabrera; Navneet Singh; Kakajan Komurov
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2015-11

2.  Survival of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Cells: Receptor Signaling to Apoptotic Control Centers.

Authors:  Marc Y Fink; Jerry E Chipuk
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2013-05

3.  Prediction of therapeutic microRNA based on the human metabolic network.

Authors:  Ming Wu; Christina Chan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  From cancer genomes to oncogenic drivers, tumour dependencies and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Cheryl Eifert; R Scott Powers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  RNAi screening comes of age: improved techniques and complementary approaches.

Authors:  Stephanie E Mohr; Jennifer A Smith; Caroline E Shamu; Ralph A Neumüller; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  A novel algorithm for finding optimal driver nodes to target control complex networks and its applications for drug targets identification.

Authors:  Wei-Feng Guo; Shao-Wu Zhang; Qian-Qian Shi; Cheng-Ming Zhang; Tao Zeng; Luonan Chen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Controlling Directed Protein Interaction Networks in Cancer.

Authors:  Krishna Kanhaiya; Eugen Czeizler; Cristian Gratie; Ion Petre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The PIKfyve-ArPIKfyve-Sac3 triad in human breast cancer: Functional link between elevated Sac3 phosphatase and enhanced proliferation of triple negative cell lines.

Authors:  Ognian C Ikonomov; Catherine Filios; Diego Sbrissa; Xuequn Chen; Assia Shisheva
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  A transcriptome-wide association study of 229,000 women identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast cancer.

Authors:  Lang Wu; Wei Shi; Jirong Long; Xingyi Guo; Kyriaki Michailidou; Jonathan Beesley; Manjeet K Bolla; Xiao-Ou Shu; Yingchang Lu; Qiuyin Cai; Fares Al-Ejeh; Esdy Rozali; Qin Wang; Joe Dennis; Bingshan Li; Chenjie Zeng; Helian Feng; Alexander Gusev; Richard T Barfield; Irene L Andrulis; Hoda Anton-Culver; Volker Arndt; Kristan J Aronson; Paul L Auer; Myrto Barrdahl; Caroline Baynes; Matthias W Beckmann; Javier Benitez; Marina Bermisheva; Carl Blomqvist; Natalia V Bogdanova; Stig E Bojesen; Hiltrud Brauch; Hermann Brenner; Louise Brinton; Per Broberg; Sara Y Brucker; Barbara Burwinkel; Trinidad Caldés; Federico Canzian; Brian D Carter; J Esteban Castelao; Jenny Chang-Claude; Xiaoqing Chen; Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Hans Christiansen; Christine L Clarke; Margriet Collée; Sten Cornelissen; Fergus J Couch; David Cox; Angela Cox; Simon S Cross; Julie M Cunningham; Kamila Czene; Mary B Daly; Peter Devilee; Kimberly F Doheny; Thilo Dörk; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Martine Dumont; Miriam Dwek; Diana M Eccles; Ursula Eilber; A Heather Eliassen; Christoph Engel; Mikael Eriksson; Laura Fachal; Peter A Fasching; Jonine Figueroa; Dieter Flesch-Janys; Olivia Fletcher; Henrik Flyger; Lin Fritschi; Marike Gabrielson; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Susan M Gapstur; Montserrat García-Closas; Mia M Gaudet; Maya Ghoussaini; Graham G Giles; Mark S Goldberg; David E Goldgar; Anna González-Neira; Pascal Guénel; Eric Hahnen; Christopher A Haiman; Niclas Håkansson; Per Hall; Emily Hallberg; Ute Hamann; Patricia Harrington; Alexander Hein; Belynda Hicks; Peter Hillemanns; Antoinette Hollestelle; Robert N Hoover; John L Hopper; Guanmengqian Huang; Keith Humphreys; David J Hunter; Anna Jakubowska; Wolfgang Janni; Esther M John; Nichola Johnson; Kristine Jones; Michael E Jones; Audrey Jung; Rudolf Kaaks; Michael J Kerin; Elza Khusnutdinova; Veli-Matti Kosma; Vessela N Kristensen; Diether Lambrechts; Loic Le Marchand; Jingmei Li; Sara Lindström; Jolanta Lissowska; Wing-Yee Lo; Sibylle Loibl; Jan Lubinski; Craig Luccarini; Michael P Lux; Robert J MacInnis; Tom Maishman; Ivana Maleva Kostovska; Arto Mannermaa; JoAnn E Manson; Sara Margolin; Dimitrios Mavroudis; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Alfons Meindl; Usha Menon; Jeffery Meyer; Anna Marie Mulligan; Susan L Neuhausen; Heli Nevanlinna; Patrick Neven; Sune F Nielsen; Børge G Nordestgaard; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Janet E Olson; Håkan Olsson; Paolo Peterlongo; Julian Peto; Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska; Ross Prentice; Nadege Presneau; Katri Pylkäs; Brigitte Rack; Paolo Radice; Nazneen Rahman; Gad Rennert; Hedy S Rennert; Valerie Rhenius; Atocha Romero; Jane Romm; Anja Rudolph; Emmanouil Saloustros; Dale P Sandler; Elinor J Sawyer; Marjanka K Schmidt; Rita K Schmutzler; Andreas Schneeweiss; Rodney J Scott; Christopher G Scott; Sheila Seal; Mitul Shah; Martha J Shrubsole; Ann Smeets; Melissa C Southey; John J Spinelli; Jennifer Stone; Harald Surowy; Anthony J Swerdlow; Rulla M Tamimi; William Tapper; Jack A Taylor; Mary Beth Terry; Daniel C Tessier; Abigail Thomas; Kathrin Thöne; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Diana Torres; Thérèse Truong; Michael Untch; Celine Vachon; David Van Den Berg; Daniel Vincent; Quinten Waisfisz; Clarice R Weinberg; Camilla Wendt; Alice S Whittemore; Hans Wildiers; Walter C Willett; Robert Winqvist; Alicja Wolk; Lucy Xia; Xiaohong R Yang; Argyrios Ziogas; Elad Ziv; Alison M Dunning; Paul D P Pharoah; Jacques Simard; Roger L Milne; Stacey L Edwards; Peter Kraft; Douglas F Easton; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  A Community Challenge for Inferring Genetic Predictors of Gene Essentialities through Analysis of a Functional Screen of Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Mehmet Gönen; Barbara A Weir; Glenn S Cowley; Francisca Vazquez; Yuanfang Guan; Alok Jaiswal; Masayuki Karasuyama; Vladislav Uzunangelov; Tao Wang; Aviad Tsherniak; Sara Howell; Daniel Marbach; Bruce Hoff; Thea C Norman; Antti Airola; Adrian Bivol; Kerstin Bunte; Daniel Carlin; Sahil Chopra; Alden Deran; Kyle Ellrott; Peddinti Gopalacharyulu; Kiley Graim; Samuel Kaski; Suleiman A Khan; Yulia Newton; Sam Ng; Tapio Pahikkala; Evan Paull; Artem Sokolov; Hao Tang; Jing Tang; Krister Wennerberg; Yang Xie; Xiaowei Zhan; Fan Zhu; Tero Aittokallio; Hiroshi Mamitsuka; Joshua M Stuart; Jesse S Boehm; David E Root; Guanghua Xiao; Gustavo Stolovitzky; William C Hahn; Adam A Margolin
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 10.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.