PURPOSE: To prospectively compare outcomes and processes of hospital-based early palliative care with standard care in surgical oncology patients (N = 152). METHODS: A randomized, mixed methods, longitudinal study evaluated the effectiveness of a hospital-based Pain and Palliative Care Service (PPCS). Interviews were conducted presurgically and at follow-up visits up to 1 year. Primary outcome measures included the Gracely Pain Intensity and Unpleasantness Scales and the Symptom Distress Scale. Qualitative interviews assessed social support, satisfaction with care, and communication with providers. Survival analysis methods explored factors related to treatment crossover and study discontinuation. Models for repeated measures within subjects over time explored treatment and covariate effects on patient-reported pain and symptom distress. RESULTS: None of the estimated differences achieved statistical significance; however, for those who remained on study for 12 months, the PPCS group performed better than their standard of care counterparts. Patients identified consistent communication, emotional support, and pain and symptom management as positive contributions delivered by the PPCS. CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear whether lower pain perceptions despite greater symptom distress were clinically meaningful; however, when coupled with the patients' perceptions of their increased resources and alternatives for pain control, one begins to see the value of an integrated PPCS.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare outcomes and processes of hospital-based early palliative care with standard care in surgical oncology patients (N = 152). METHODS: A randomized, mixed methods, longitudinal study evaluated the effectiveness of a hospital-based Pain and Palliative Care Service (PPCS). Interviews were conducted presurgically and at follow-up visits up to 1 year. Primary outcome measures included the Gracely Pain Intensity and Unpleasantness Scales and the Symptom Distress Scale. Qualitative interviews assessed social support, satisfaction with care, and communication with providers. Survival analysis methods explored factors related to treatment crossover and study discontinuation. Models for repeated measures within subjects over time explored treatment and covariate effects on patient-reported pain and symptom distress. RESULTS: None of the estimated differences achieved statistical significance; however, for those who remained on study for 12 months, the PPCS group performed better than their standard of care counterparts. Patients identified consistent communication, emotional support, and pain and symptom management as positive contributions delivered by the PPCS. CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear whether lower pain perceptions despite greater symptom distress were clinically meaningful; however, when coupled with the patients' perceptions of their increased resources and alternatives for pain control, one begins to see the value of an integrated PPCS.
Authors: Irene J Higginson; Ilora Finlay; Danielle M Goodwin; Alison M Cook; Kerry Hood; Adrian G K Edwards; Hannah-Rose Douglas; Charles E Norman Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: J C McArthur; C Yiannoutsos; D M Simpson; B T Adornato; E J Singer; H Hollander; C Marra; M Rubin; B A Cohen; T Tucker; B A Navia; G Schifitto; D Katzenstein; C Rask; L Zaborski; M E Smith; S Shriver; L Millar; D B Clifford; I J Karalnik Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-03-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: R K Portenoy; H T Thaler; A B Kornblith; J M Lepore; H Friedlander-Klar; E Kiyasu; K Sobel; N Coyle; N Kemeny; L Norton Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1994 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Dio Kavalieratos; Jennifer Corbelli; Di Zhang; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Natalie C Ernecoff; Janel Hanmer; Zachariah P Hoydich; Dara Z Ikejiani; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Camilla Zimmermann; Sally C Morton; Robert M Arnold; Lucas Heller; Yael Schenker Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Veerawat Phongtankuel; Lauren Meador; Ronald D Adelman; Jordan Roberts; Charles R Henderson; Sonal S Mehta; Tessa Del Carmen; M C Reid Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Natalie C Ernecoff; Devon Check; Megan Bannon; Laura C Hanson; James Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Jennifer Corbelli; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Yael Schenker; Camilla Zimmermann; Robert M Arnold; Dio Kavalieratos Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Adam E Singer; Joy R Goebel; Yan S Kim; Sydney M Dy; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Megan Clifford; Elizabeth Dzeng; Claire E O'Hanlon; Aneesa Motala; Anne M Walling; Jaime Goldberg; Daniella Meeker; Claudia Ochotorena; Roberta Shanman; Mike Cui; Karl A Lorenz Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Rebecca E Ryan; Michael Connolly; Natalie K Bradford; Simon Henderson; Anthony Herbert; Lina Schonfeld; Jeanine Young; Josephine I Bothroyd; Amanda Henderson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-07-08
Authors: Bernard Tawfik; Ellen Burgess; Mikaela Kosich; Shoshana Adler Jaffe; Dolores D Guest; Ursa Brown-Glaberman; V Shane Pankratz; Andrew Sussman Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 2.532