Literature DB >> 22101497

Combined intravitreal bevacizumab and grid laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Simone Donati1, Paolo Barosi, Marco Bianchi, Muna Al Oum, Claudio Azzolini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) versus combined IVB and macular grid laser photocoagulation for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: In this prospective study, 18 eyes were randomized into 2 groups according to treatment: Group 1 (9 eyes) underwent IVB at baseline, at month 1, and at month 2; Group 2 (9 eyes) underwent same IVB protocol combined with macular grid laser photocoagulation. Macular edema and visual acuity represented the endpoints of the study. IVB reinjections were performed in both groups if recurrent macular edema was diagnosed. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography examination as well as visual acuity examination were performed during follow-up. Statistical evaluation was performed for a matched-pair analysis.
RESULTS: In Group 1, median baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 420 µm (95% confidence interval 355.6-484.4) to 323 µm (261.44-384.56) at month 12 (p=0.06); median baseline BCVA improved from 0.7 logMAR (0.54-0.86) to 0.4 logMAR (0.29-0.51) at month 12 (p<0.01). In Group 2, baseline CRT decreased from 386 µm (353.91-418.09) to 238 µm (200.58-275.42) at month 12 (p<0.01); median BCVA improved from 0.6 logMAR (0.45-0.75) to 0.2 logMAR (0.12-0.28) at month 12 (p<0.01). A statistically significant difference (p=0.03) was found regarding the median number of injections (Group 1: 4±1.1; Group 2: 3±0.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment modalities appeared effective to control BRVO-induced macular edema. In the combined-treatment Group, we observed a lower number of reinjections during follow-up, suggesting the efficacy of grid laser photocoagulation to reduce the number of intravitreal injections and maintain short- and long-term results of the therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22101497     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Statement of the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA), the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) and the Retinological Society (RG) on intravitreal treatment of vision-reducing macular edema by retinal vein occlusion : Treatment strategies, status 24 April 2018].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Bevacizumab versus bevacizumab and macular grid photocoagulation for macular edema in eyes with non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion: results from a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Josep Callizo; Abed Atili; Nina Antonia Striebe; Sebastian Bemme; Nicolas Feltgen; Hans Hoerauf; Thomas Bertelmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Effect of leaking capillaries and microaneurysms in the perifoveal capillary network on resolution of macular edema by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Iesato; Akira Imai; Takao Hirano; Yuichi Toriyama; Toshinori Murata
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor indications in ocular disease.

Authors:  Stefan Cornel; Iliescu Daniela Adriana; Timaru Cristina Mihaela; Schmitzer Speranta; De Simone Algerino; Batras Mehdi; Hosseini-Ramhormozi Jalaladin
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

5.  Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion- (BRVO-) Related Macular Edema Treated with Anti-VEGF Injections Alone versus Anti-VEGF Injections Combined with Focal Laser.

Authors:  Meredith E Thomley; Cole N Gross; Ana Preda-Naumescu; Kelly S Chen; Thomas Swain; John O Mason Iii; Jason N Crosson
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Zaid Shalchi; Omar Mahroo; Catey Bunce; Danny Mitry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-07

Review 7.  Efficacy and safety of intravitreal therapy in macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amelie Pielen; Nicolas Feltgen; Christin Isserstedt; Josep Callizo; Bernd Junker; Christine Schmucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Intravitreal bevacizumab alone or combined with macular laser photocoagulation for recurrent or persistent macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Takafumi Hirashima; Tomoyuki Chihara; Toshitaka Bun; Takao Utsumi; Miou Hirose; Hideyasu Oh
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Comparison between Intravitreal Triamcinolone with Grid Laser Photocoagulation versus Bevacizumab with Grid Laser Photocoagulation Combinations for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Authors:  Abdullah Ozkaya; Ugur Celik; Zeynep Alkin; Miray Faiz Turan; Ahmet Taylan Yazici; Ahmet Demirok
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-19

10.  Two-year outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Taiichi Hikichi; Makoto Higuchi; Takuro Matsushita; Shoko Kosaka; Reiko Matsushita; Kimitaka Takami; Hideo Ohtsuka; Hirokuni Kitamei; Shoko Shioya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.