Literature DB >> 30610424

Bevacizumab versus bevacizumab and macular grid photocoagulation for macular edema in eyes with non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion: results from a prospective randomized study.

Josep Callizo1, Abed Atili2, Nina Antonia Striebe3, Sebastian Bemme3, Nicolas Feltgen3, Hans Hoerauf3, Thomas Bertelmann3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was the investigation of the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab (BEV) with or without additional macular grid laser photocoagulation (GRID) for macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: Prospective, randomized, monocentric study. Thirty-two patients were included. Initially, all eyes in both groups received three monthly injections of BEV, followed by additional injections if re-treatment criteria were met. In the BEV + GRID group, photocoagulation was performed 2 weeks after the first BEV injection and laser re-treatment was allowed. The follow-up was 38 weeks. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Changes of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and of retinal ischemia, as well as the number of injections were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Sixteen eyes were randomized into each group. At baseline, BCVA was similar in both groups (BEV + GRID: 20/71; BEV: 20/60; P = 0.51). At 38 weeks, BCVA significantly improved in the two groups (BEV + GRID gain of 9 ± 11.2 letters and 16.25 ± 10.08 letters in the BEV) with no difference between them (P < 0.06). With regard to anatomical findings, initial CRT in BEV + GRID was 496.2 μm ± 138.4 μm and 538.9 μm ± 156.9 μm in BEV (P < 0.1697). At 38 weeks, CRT decreased in both groups significantly, 98.2 μm in the BEV + GRID (P = 0.02) and 141.7 μm in the BEV group (P = 0.01), with no significant difference between groups (P < 0.17). The area of FAZ a significantly increased in both groups (41% (P = 0.04) in BEV + GRID; 35% (P = 0.03) in BEV) during the study and the grade of peripheral ischemia remained unchanged. The mean number of injections was 3.8 (range 3-6) with no significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate a beneficial effect of bevacizumab in ME in eyes with BRVO. A loading phase of three injections led to a significant improvement in vision in both groups, which persisted at week 38. Additional grid laser photocoagulation exhibited no beneficial functional or anatomical effect during the study, nor did it reduce the number of injections. The FAZ area increased significantly in both groups, but overall retinal ischemia did not. Further studies investigating more numerous eyes and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-VEGF; Bevacizumab; Branch retinal vein occlusion; Grid laser photocoagulation; Macular edema

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30610424     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-04223-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  30 in total

1.  Intravitreal bevacizumab associated with grid laser photocoagulation in macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Angel Salinas-Alamán; Javier Zarranz-Ventura; Jose M Caire González-Jauregui; Luis M Sádaba-Echarri; Jesús Barrio-Barrio; Alfredo García-Layana
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  One-year results after intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Gesine B Jaissle; Martin Leitritz; Faik Gelisken; Focke Ziemssen; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Scatter Photocoagulation Does Not Reduce Macular Edema or Treatment Burden in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion: The RELATE Trial.

Authors:  Peter A Campochiaro; Gulnar Hafiz; Tahreem A Mir; Adrienne W Scott; Sharon Solomon; Ingrid Zimmer-Galler; Akrit Sodhi; Elia Duh; Howard Ying; Adam Wenick; Syed Mahmood Shah; Diana V Do; Quan D Nguyen; Saleema Kherani; Raafay Sophie
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Intravitreal bevacizumab combined with grid photocoagulation in recurrent macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Elvira Farese; Gilda Cennamo; Nunzio Velotti; Claudio Traversi; Michele Rinaldi; Giuseppe De Crecchio
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.597

Review 5.  RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSIONS, FROM BASICS TO THE LATEST TREATMENT.

Authors:  Mary Ho; David T L Liu; Dennis S C Lam; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Ranibizumab for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Associated Macular Edema Study (RABAMES): six-month results of a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Amelie Pielen; Alireza Mirshahi; Nicolas Feltgen; Katrin Lorenz; Christina Korb; Bernd Junker; Caroline Schaefer; Isabella Zwiener; Lars-Olof Hattenbach
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 7.  Optimal Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion: Canadian Expert Consensus.

Authors:  Alan R Berger; Alan F Cruess; Filiberto Altomare; Varun Chaudhary; Kevin Colleaux; Mark Greve; Amin Kherani; Efrem D Mandelcorn; Hugh Parsons; Marc-André Rhéaume; Eric Tourville
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of intravitreal therapy in macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amelie Pielen; Nicolas Feltgen; Christin Isserstedt; Josep Callizo; Bernd Junker; Christine Schmucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Changes in the foveal microstructure after intravitreal bevacizumab application in patients with retinal vascular disease.

Authors:  Nikolaus Feucht; Etienne Michael Schönbach; Ines Lanzl; Konstantin Kotliar; Chris Patrick Lohmann; Mathias Maier
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-18

10.  Two-year outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Taiichi Hikichi; Makoto Higuchi; Takuro Matsushita; Shoko Kosaka; Reiko Matsushita; Kimitaka Takami; Hideo Ohtsuka; Hirokuni Kitamei; Shoko Shioya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  5 in total

1.  Covid-19 Impact on Macular Neovascularization and Retinal Vein Occlusion Treatment: Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Rodrigo Vilares-Morgado; Carolina Madeira; Ana Maria Cunha; Manuel Falcão; João Beato; Ana Catarina Pedrosa; Susana Penas; Elisete Brandão; Fernando Falcão-Reis; Ângela Carneiro
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2021-12-08

2.  Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion- (BRVO-) Related Macular Edema Treated with Anti-VEGF Injections Alone versus Anti-VEGF Injections Combined with Focal Laser.

Authors:  Meredith E Thomley; Cole N Gross; Ana Preda-Naumescu; Kelly S Chen; Thomas Swain; John O Mason Iii; Jason N Crosson
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Combination of Ranibizumab with macular laser for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: one-year results from a randomized controlled double-blind trial.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Xiaobing Yu; Peng Zhang; Xiaoya Gu; Hong Dai
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Comparison of the efficiency of anti-VEGF drugs intravitreal injections treatment with or without retinal laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weijie Zou; Yuanyuan Du; Xiaoyan Ji; Ji Zhang; Hongping Ding; Jingqiao Chen; Tao Wang; Fangfang Ji; Jiang Huang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.988

5.  Changes in Macular Microvascular Structure in Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Treated with Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor for One Year.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Xiaobing Yu; Peng Zhang; Hong Dai
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 1.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.