Literature DB >> 22101362

MM/GBSA and LIE estimates of host-guest affinities: dependence on charges and solvation model.

Samuel Genheden1.   

Abstract

The affinities of two sets of guest-host systems were estimated using the popular end-point methods MM/GBSA (molecular-mechanics with generalised Born and surface-area solvation) and LIE (linear interaction energy). A set of six primary alcohols that bind to α-cyclodextrin (α-CD) and a set of eight guest molecules to cucurbit[8]uril (CB8) were considered. Three different charge schemes were used to obtain charges for the host and guest molecules, viz., AM1-BCC, RESP, and the recently suggested xAvESP (which average ESP charges over a number of molecular dynamics snapshots). Furthermore, both the generalised Born and Poisson-Boltzmann solvation models were used in the MM/GBSA calculations. The two solvation models perform equally well in predicting relative affinities, and hence there is no point in using the more expensive Poisson-Boltzmann model for these systems. Both the LIE and MM/GBSA estimates are shown to be robust with respect to the charge model, and therefore it is recommended to use the cheapest AM1-BCC charges. Using AM1-BCC charges, the MM/GBSA method gave a MADtr (mean absolute deviation after removal of systematic error) of 17 kJ/mol and a correlation coefficient (r (2)) of 0.67 for the CB8 complexes, and a MADtr of 10 kJ/mol and an r (2) of 0.96 for the α-CD complexes. The LIE method gave a MADtr of 20 kJ/mol and an r (2) of 0.10 for the CB8 complexes, after optimisation of the non-polar scaling parameter. For the α-CD complexes, no optimisation was necessary and the method gave a MADtr of 2 kJ/mol and a r (2) of 0.96. These results indicate that both MM/GBSA and LIE are able to estimate host-guest affinities accurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22101362     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9486-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  29 in total

1.  Are free energy calculations useful in practice? A comparison with rapid scoring functions for the p38 MAP kinase protein system.

Authors:  D A Pearlman; P S Charifson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Binding affinity prediction with different force fields: examination of the linear interaction energy method.

Authors:  Martin Almlöf; Bjørn O Brandsdal; Johan Aqvist
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Alessandra Villa; Alan E Mark; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 6.  Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Computations of Absolute Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules Using Explicit and Implicit Solvent Model.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods.

Authors:  T Hansson; J Marelius; J Aqvist
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03

10.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  6 in total

1.  Binding affinities in the SAMPL3 trypsin and host-guest blind tests estimated with the MM/PBSA and LIE methods.

Authors:  Paulius Mikulskis; Samuel Genheden; Patrik Rydberg; Lars Sandberg; Lars Olsen; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Assessing protein-ligand binding modes with computational tools: the case of PDE4B.

Authors:  Gülşah Çifci; Viktorya Aviyente; E Demet Akten; Gerald Monard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Comparison of radii sets, entropy, QM methods, and sampling on MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and QM/MM-GBSA ligand binding energies of F. tularensis enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI).

Authors:  Pin-Chih Su; Cheng-Chieh Tsai; Shahila Mehboob; Kirk E Hevener; Michael E Johnson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 4.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.098

5.  Ca2+ binding induced sequential allosteric activation of sortase A: An example for ion-triggered conformational selection.

Authors:  Ilke Ugur; Martin Schatte; Antoine Marion; Manuel Glaser; Mara Boenitz-Dulat; Iris Antes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Enhanced Solubility and Anticancer Potential of Mansonone G By β-Cyclodextrin-Based Host-Guest Complexation: A Computational and Experimental Study.

Authors:  Panupong Mahalapbutr; Piyanuch Wonganan; Thanapon Charoenwongpaiboon; Manchumas Prousoontorn; Warinthorn Chavasiri; Thanyada Rungrotmongkol
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-09-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.