Literature DB >> 22100817

Spatial characteristics of motion-sensitive mechanisms change with age and stimulus spatial frequency.

Lisa R Betts1, Allison B Sekuler, Patrick J Bennett.   

Abstract

Contrast-dependent interactions between classical (CRF) and non-classical regions (nCRF) of visual neuron receptive fields are well documented in primate visual cortex. Physiological models that describe CRF and nCRF interactions in single neurons have recently been applied to psychophysical measures of spatial summation and suppression in motion perception of young adults (Tadin & Lappin, 2005). We wished to determine whether such models could account for the reduction in spatial suppression that occurs in normal aging (Betts et al., 2005). We applied three models to duration thresholds obtained in a simple motion discrimination task using drifting Gabor stimuli that ranged in spatial frequency from 0.5 to 4c/deg. We found that a model in which the center CRF and surrounding nCRF are represented as spatially-overlapping excitatory and inhibitory 2D Gaussians with independent contrast response functions, which we call the Gain model, could account for the effects of aging simply by increasing the spatial extent of the CRF. Two additional models were evaluated. The Size model, which varied the size of the CRF as a function of contrast, produced CRF and nCRF size constants that departed significantly from physiological estimates of receptive field sizes. The Drive model, which yoked the activation of the suppressive nCRF to the CRF response, yielded reasonable fits to the data and suggested an age-related decline in the strength of suppression from the nCRF. However, the Drive model estimated the CRF size parameter to be equal to, or even slightly larger than, the nCRF size parameter, which is inconsistent with the physiological literature. Our findings therefore suggest that the Gain model provides the most plausible estimates of receptive field sizes. Based on this model, age-related increases in the size of central excitatory receptive fields relative to the inhibitory surrounds may contribute to behavioral measures of reduced spatial suppression found in older observers.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22100817     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Age-related changes in fine motion direction discriminations.

Authors:  Nadejda Bocheva; Donka Angelova; Miroslava Stefanova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sex Differences in Visual Motion Processing.

Authors:  Scott O Murray; Michael-Paul Schallmo; Tamar Kolodny; Rachel Millin; Alex Kale; Philipp Thomas; Thomas H Rammsayer; Stefan J Troche; Raphael A Bernier; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Brightness induction and suprathreshold vision: effects of age and visual field.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Lynnette M Leone; Barbara Blakeslee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Larger Receptive Field Size as a Mechanism Underlying Atypical Motion Perception in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Kimberly B Schauder; Woon Ju Park; Duje Tadin; Loisa Bennetto
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-13

5.  Abnormal Size-Dependent Modulation of Motion Perception in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).

Authors:  Olga V Sysoeva; Ilia A Galuta; Maria S Davletshina; Elena V Orekhova; Tatiana A Stroganova
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Testing the link between visual suppression and intelligence.

Authors:  Sandra Arranz-Paraíso; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spatial suppression promotes rapid figure-ground segmentation of moving objects.

Authors:  Duje Tadin; Woon Ju Park; Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Joseph S Lappin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Weaker neural suppression in autism.

Authors:  Michael-Paul Schallmo; Tamar Kolodny; Alexander M Kale; Rachel Millin; Anastasia V Flevaris; Richard A E Edden; Jennifer Gerdts; Raphael A Bernier; Scott O Murray
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Perceptual learning and aging: improved performance for low-contrast motion discrimination.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Bower; Takeo Watanabe; George J Andersen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-20

10.  Suppression and facilitation of human neural responses.

Authors:  Michael-Paul Schallmo; Alexander M Kale; Rachel Millin; Anastasia V Flevaris; Zoran Brkanac; Richard Ae Edden; Raphael A Bernier; Scott O Murray
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.