Literature DB >> 22100297

Polysomy and p16 deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.

Tamas A Gonda1, Michael P Glick, Amrita Sethi, John M Poneros, Walter Palmas, Shahzad Iqbal, Susana Gonzalez, Subhadra V Nandula, Jean C Emond, Robert S Brown, Vundavalli V Murty, Peter D Stevens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures is limited because of the low sensitivity of cytology. However, an accurate diagnosis of malignancy is critical in the management of patients with suspected biliary malignancy. Testing for chromosomal aneuploidy by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) may increase the yield.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FISH in indeterminate biliary strictures and the additional value of including deletion of 9p21 (p16) in the diagnostic criteria of malignant biliary strictures.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: This study involved 76 consecutive patients who were seen for the evaluation of indeterminate strictures at our institution. These patients were screened, and 50 patients with either a final pathologic diagnosis or ≥ 12 months' conclusive follow-up were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) analysis of cytology alone compared with the presence of FISH polysomy versus FISH polysomy and 9p21 deletion.
RESULTS: The presence of increased copy numbers (polysomy) of chromosome 3, 7, or 17 by FISH increased the sensitivity of brush cytology from 21% to 58%, and when the presence of 9p21 deletion was included, the sensitivity increased to 89%. The specificity of FISH was 97% (vs 100% for cytology). The accuracy of cytology combined with FISH polysomy (AUC = 0.93) or p16 deletion was significantly greater than the accuracy of cytology alone (AUC 0.6; P < .001) or even cytology combined with FISH polysomy (AUC = 0.77; P ≤ .05). LIMITATIONS: Sample size. There is a relatively high incidence of malignant biliary strictures in the entire cohort but low incidence among primary sclerosing cholangitis patients, and the majority of cancers are cholangiocarcinomas (as opposed to pancreatic).
CONCLUSION: FISH significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of brush cytology in indeterminate biliary strictures. In our series, the addition of 9p21 deletion to FISH polysomy and cytology further improved sensitivity. This suggests that 9p21 deletion may be added to the diagnostic criteria in indeterminate strictures.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22100297     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  25 in total

Review 1.  Advanced endoscopic imaging of indeterminate biliary strictures.

Authors:  James H Tabibian; Kavel H Visrodia; Michael J Levy; Christopher J Gostout
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 2.  Endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures.

Authors:  Jesús García-Cano
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-08

Review 3.  Liver transplantation in the management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Aliya F Gulamhusein; William Sanchez
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-06

Review 4.  Diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.

Authors:  Domenico Viterbo; Valerie Gausman; Tamas Gonda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-10

5.  DNA flow cytometric analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue for the diagnosis of malignancy in bile duct biopsies.

Authors:  Hannah Lee; Peter S Rabinovitch; Aras N Mattis; Sanjay Kakar; Won-Tak Choi
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 6.  Current diagnostic and management options in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sumera Rizvi; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 7.  Liver masses: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic perspective.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Vishal Chandan; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Combination of ERCP-Based Modalities Increases Diagnostic Yield for Biliary Strictures.

Authors:  Samuel Han; Philip Tatman; Sanjana Mehrotra; Sachin Wani; Augustin R Attwell; Steven A Edmundowicz; Brian C Brauer; Mihir S Wagh; Hazem T Hammad; Raj J Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  The treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: a hepatologist's perspective.

Authors:  Kamran Qureshi; Randhir Jesudoss; Abdullah M S Al-Osaimi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-10

Review 10.  Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nataliya Razumilava; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.