Literature DB >> 22100029

Accuracy of estimating resting oxygen uptake and implications for hemodynamic assessment.

Nikhil Narang1, M Odette Gore, Peter G Snell, Colby R Ayers, Santiago Lorenzo, Graeme Carrick-Ranson, Tony G Babb, Benjamin D Levine, Amit Khera, James A de Lemos, Darren K McGuire.   

Abstract

The Fick principle (cardiac output [Q(c)] = oxygen uptake [Vo(2)]/arteriovenous oxygen difference) can be used to calculate Q(c), with VO(2) frequently estimated by derived equations. To compare the accuracy of measured versus estimated VO(2), data were analyzed from 2 studies in which VO(2) at rest was measured using the Douglas bag technique. One study comprised adults with diabetes, and the other was an exercise study of healthy adults. VO(2) at rest was estimated as VO(2) (ml/min) = 125 ml/min/m(2) × body surface area (m(2)), with sensitivity analyses evaluating 2 other commonly used equations. Mean absolute difference (milliliters per minute) and ordinary least products regression were used to assess agreement between measured and estimated VO(2). Overall, mean measured versus estimated VO(2) differed significantly (307.2 ± 75.2 vs 259.9 ± 36.7 ml/min, p <0.0001), with a mean absolute difference of 52.9 ± 43.2 ml/min (p <0.0001); 20% of the estimates differed by >25% from the measured VO(2). Mean absolute difference increased from 36.7 ml/min in the lowest body mass index group (<25 kg/m(2)) to 91.7 ml/min in the highest group (≥40 kg/m(2)) (p for trend = 0.001) and was significantly higher in men than in women (65.6 vs 33.9 ml/min, p = 0.001); error was similar by median-split age (p = 0.65) and race (p = 0.34). Similar results were obtained when evaluating each of the other 2 estimating equations. Estimation of VO(2) at rest is inaccurate, especially in men and with increasing adiposity. In conclusion, when clinical hemodynamic assessment is performed, VO(2) should be measured, not estimated.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22100029     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Thermodilution vs Estimated Fick Cardiac Output Measurement in Clinical Practice: An Analysis of Mortality From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (VA CART) Program and Vanderbilt University.

Authors:  Alexander R Opotowsky; Edward Hess; Bradley A Maron; Evan L Brittain; Anna E Barón; Thomas M Maddox; Laith I Alshawabkeh; Bradley M Wertheim; Meng Xu; Tufik R Assad; Jonathan D Rich; Gaurav Choudhary; Ryan J Tedford
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Resting Oxygen Consumption and Heart Failure: Importance of Measurement for Determination of Cardiac Output With the Use of the Fick Principle.

Authors:  Gillian Grafton; Thomas M Cascino; Daniel Perry; Carmel Ashur; Todd M Koelling
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 5.712

3.  Can we better estimate resting oxygen consumption by incorporating arterial blood gases and spirometric determinations?

Authors:  Adriano R Tonelli; Xiao-Feng Wang; Anara Abbay; Qi Zhang; José Ramos; Kevin McCarthy
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 4.  Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Hemodynamic Assessment and Treatment Selection-Focus on Group II Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Bhavadharini Ramu; Brian A Houston; Ryan J Tedford
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-04

5.  Invasive Hemodynamic and Metabolic Evaluation of HFpEF.

Authors:  J Emanuel Finet; Erik H Van Iterson; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-03-26

6.  Body Habitus Considerations During Right Heart Catheterization.

Authors:  Natasha R Girdharry; Robert F Bentley; Felipe H Valle; Elizabeth Karvasarski; Sinan Osman; Vikram Gurtu; Shimon Kolker; Susanna Mak
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-04-30

7.  Thermodilution vs estimated Fick cardiac output measurement in an elderly cohort of patients: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Karl-Patrik Kresoja; Alessandro Faragli; Dawud Abawi; Oliver Paul; Burkert Pieske; Heiner Post; Alessio Alogna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.