Bhavadharini Ramu1, Brian A Houston1, Ryan J Tedford2. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Strom Thurmond Gazes Building, Room 215, 114 Doughty St/MSC592, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Strom Thurmond Gazes Building, Room 215, 114 Doughty St/MSC592, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. TedfordR@musc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension worldwide, yet therapies used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension have failed to show efficacy in this population. Proper hemodynamic assessment and differentiation of pulmonary hypertension phenotypes is therefore critical for both current clinical practice and future research and therapeutic efforts. RECENT FINDINGS: Substantial recent efforts have sought to improve the hemodynamic characterization of pulmonary hypertension for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes. These efforts include identifying occult LHD using provocative maneuvers as well as sub-classifying PH-LHD based on the presence or absence of a pre-capillary component. How to best define the pre-capillary component remains controversial as several studies have drawn conflicting conclusions. The lack of standardization of hemodynamic measurements as well as measurement fidelity concerns may explain some of the discrepant results. Non-hemodynamic methods of PH-LHD classification may also have an emerging role. Despite recent advances, therapeutic studies have largely remained disappointing. In this review, we discuss the nuances and controversies surrounding diagnostic and prognostic hemodynamic characterization of PH-LHD as well as summarize the recent therapeutic efforts and ongoing challenges in this population.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension worldwide, yet therapies used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension have failed to show efficacy in this population. Proper hemodynamic assessment and differentiation of pulmonary hypertension phenotypes is therefore critical for both current clinical practice and future research and therapeutic efforts. RECENT FINDINGS: Substantial recent efforts have sought to improve the hemodynamic characterization of pulmonary hypertension for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes. These efforts include identifying occult LHD using provocative maneuvers as well as sub-classifying PH-LHD based on the presence or absence of a pre-capillary component. How to best define the pre-capillary component remains controversial as several studies have drawn conflicting conclusions. The lack of standardization of hemodynamic measurements as well as measurement fidelity concerns may explain some of the discrepant results. Non-hemodynamic methods of PH-LHD classification may also have an emerging role. Despite recent advances, therapeutic studies have largely remained disappointing. In this review, we discuss the nuances and controversies surrounding diagnostic and prognostic hemodynamic characterization of PH-LHD as well as summarize the recent therapeutic efforts and ongoing challenges in this population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hemodynamics; Left heart disease; Pulmonary hypertension; Right heart catheterization
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: William M Oldham; Gregory D Lewis; Alexander R Opotowsky; Aaron B Waxman; David M Systrom Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Thomas F Lüscher; Frank Enseleit; Richard Pacher; Veselin Mitrovic; Matthias R Schulze; Roland Willenbrock; Rainer Dietz; Valentin Rousson; David Hürlimann; Sebastian Philipp; Thomas Notter; Georg Noll; Frank Ruschitzka Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-11-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Emmanouil Tampakakis; Peter J Leary; Van N Selby; Teresa De Marco; Thomas P Cappola; G Michael Felker; Stuart D Russell; Edward K Kasper; Ryan J Tedford Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Milton Packer; John McMurray; Barry M Massie; Abraham Caspi; Vincent Charlon; Alain Cohen-Solal; Wolfgang Kiowski; William Kostuk; Henry Krum; Barry Levine; Paolo Rizzon; Jordi Soler; Karl Swedberg; Susan Anderson; David L Demets Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: R M Califf; K F Adams; W J McKenna; M Gheorghiade; B F Uretsky; S E McNulty; H Darius; K Schulman; F Zannad; E Handberg-Thurmond; F E Harrell; W Wheeler; J Soler-Soler; K Swedberg Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Margaret M Redfield; Horng H Chen; Barry A Borlaug; Marc J Semigran; Kerry L Lee; Gregory Lewis; Martin M LeWinter; Jean L Rouleau; David A Bull; Douglas L Mann; Anita Deswal; Lynne W Stevenson; Michael M Givertz; Elizabeth O Ofili; Christopher M O'Connor; G Michael Felker; Steven R Goldsmith; Bradley A Bart; Steven E McNulty; Jenny C Ibarra; Grace Lin; Jae K Oh; Manesh R Patel; Raymond J Kim; Russell P Tracy; Eric J Velazquez; Kevin J Anstrom; Adrian F Hernandez; Alice M Mascette; Eugene Braunwald Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ryan J Tedford; Anna R Hemnes; Stuart D Russell; Ilan S Wittstein; Mobusher Mahmud; Ari L Zaiman; Stephen C Mathai; David R Thiemann; Paul M Hassoun; Reda E Girgis; Jonathan B Orens; Ashish S Shah; David Yuh; John V Conte; Hunter C Champion Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Anna R Hemnes; Alexander R Opotowsky; Tufik R Assad; Meng Xu; Laura N Doss; Eric Farber-Eger; Quinn S Wells; Evan L Brittain Journal: Chest Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 9.410