Literature DB >> 22100001

Predictors of sperm recovery and azoospermia relapse in men with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocele repair.

Taha A Abdel-Meguid1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study we determined the recoverability and sustainability of motile sperm in semen of men with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocelectomy as related to different variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with documented infertility for more than 1 year, with nonobstructive azoospermia and clinically palpable varicoceles were included in this prospective noncontrolled study. Participants underwent simultaneous subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy and testicular biopsies. Preoperative as well as initial and late followup semen analyses were performed. Outcomes of sperm recovery and relapse of azoospermia were correlated with the variables of patient age, infertility duration, varicocele grade, laterality, follicle-stimulating hormone, testicular volume and testicular histology.
RESULTS: The study included 31 men with a mean ± SD age of 34.9 ± 8.7 years and mean followup of 19.3 ± 3.3 months. Hypospermatogenesis, late maturation arrest, early maturation arrest and Sertoli-cell-only were observed in 13, 6, 2 and 10 patients, respectively. Overall, sperm recovery was evident in 10 of 31 (32.3%) patients (persistent recovery 19.4%, intermittent recovery 6.5%, relapse 6.5%). Sperm were recovered in patients with hypospermatogenesis (7 of 13, 53.8%) and late maturation arrest (3 of 6, 50%). No sperm were recovered in those with early maturation arrest or Sertoli-cell-only. Among the variables only histological patterns demonstrated a significant correlation with recovery (rho = 0.504, p = 0.004). None of variables was significantly correlated with relapse. Bilateral varicocele repair demonstrated a strong yet nonsignificant negative correlation with relapse (rho = -0.612, p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Varicocelectomy could recover motile sperm in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, palpable varicoceles and hypospermatogenesis or late maturation arrest. No sperm was recovered with early maturation arrest or Sertoli-cell-only. Recovery might be persistent or intermittent, or involve relapse of azoospermia. Testicular histology was the sole parameter significantly correlated with recovery and no predictors of relapse could be identified. This prognostic role of testicular biopsy is imperative in couple counseling.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22100001     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

Review 1.  Microsurgical varicocelectomy: a review.

Authors:  Akanksha Mehta; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Embolization of left spermatic vein in non-obstructive azoospermic men with varicocele: role of FSH to predict the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment.

Authors:  S D'Andrea; A V Giordano; S Carducci; L Sacchetti; S Necozione; M Costanzo; A De Gregorio; A Micillo; F Francavilla; S Francavilla; A Barbonetti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  The development of surgical sperm extraction and new challenges to improve the outcome.

Authors:  Noritoshi Enatsu; Koji Chiba; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 4.  Non-obstructive azoospermia and clinical varicocele: therapeutic options.

Authors:  Saad Elzanaty
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Progressing management of non-obstructive azoospermia in the era of microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Authors:  Satoru Kanto; Kazumitsu Yamasaki; Teruaki Iwamoto
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-08

Review 6.  Varicocele and testicular function.

Authors:  Alexander W Pastuszak; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Influence of preoperative pain duration on microsurgical varicocelectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Mustafa Gökhan Köse; Kadir Onem; Mehmet Cetinkaya; Erkan Karadağ; Emre Arpali
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 8.  Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ricardo Miyaoka; Matheus Roque; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  The role of varicocele treatment in the management of non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Kubilay Inci; Levent Mert Gunay
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 10.  Review of Azoospermia.

Authors:  Matthew Wosnitzer; Marc Goldstein; Matthew P Hardy
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2014-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.