Literature DB >> 22099048

Dose-volume analysis of predictors for gastrointestinal toxicity after concurrent full-dose gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Jiayi Huang1, John M Robertson, Hong Ye, Jeffrey Margolis, Laura Nadeau, Di Yan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify dosimetric predictors for the development of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) treated with concurrent full-dose gemcitabine and radiotherapy (GemRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From June 2002 to June 2009, 46 LAPC patients treated with definitive GemRT were retrospectively analyzed. The stomach and duodenum were retrospectively contoured separately to determine their dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. GI toxicity was defined as Grade 3 or higher GI toxicity. The follow-up time was calculated from the start of RT to the date of death or last contact. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were performed to identify risk factors associated with GI toxicity. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to determine the best DVH parameter to predict for GI toxicity.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 28 (61%) received concurrent gemcitabine alone, and 18 (39%) had concurrent gemcitabine with daily erlotinib. On UVA, only the V(20Gy) to V(35Gy) of duodenum were significantly associated with GI toxicity (all p ≤ 0.05). On MVA, the V(25Gy) of duodenum and the use of erlotinib were independent risk factors for GI toxicity (p = 0.006 and 0.02, respectively). For the entire cohort, the V(25Gy) of duodenum is the best predictor for GI toxicity (AUC = 0.717), and the 12-month GI toxicity rate was 8% vs. 48% for V(25Gy) ≤ 45% and V(25Gy) > 45%, respectively (p = 0.03). However, excluding the erlotinib group, the V(35Gy) is the best predictor (AUC = 0.725), and the 12-month GI toxicity rate was 0% vs. 41% for V(35Gy) ≤ 20% and V(35Gy) > 20%, respectively (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: DVH parameters of duodenum may predict Grade 3 GI toxicity after GemRT for LAPC. Concurrent use of erlotinib during GemRT may increase GI toxicity.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22099048     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  20 in total

1.  Dosimetric parameters correlate with duodenal histopathologic damage after stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Vivek Verma; Audrey J Lazenby; Dandan Zheng; Abhijeet R Bhirud; Quan P Ly; Chandrakanth Are; Aaron R Sasson; Chi Lin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  [Personnel calculation in health care: intensive care and intermediate care units].

Authors:  W Plücker
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  Dosimetric and clinical toxicity comparison of critical organ preservation with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and RapidArc for the treatment of locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic head.

Authors:  L Jin; R Wang; S Jiang; J Yue; T Liu; X Dou; K Zhu; R Feng; X Xu; D Chen; Y Yin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Predictive factors for gastroduodenal toxicity based on endoscopy following radiotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  H Yoon; D Oh; H C Park; S W Kang; Y Han; D H Lim; S W Paik
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Upper abdominal normal organ contouring guidelines and atlas: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus.

Authors:  Salma K Jabbour; Sameh A Hashem; Walter Bosch; Tae Kyoung Kim; Steven E Finkelstein; Bethany M Anderson; Edgar Ben-Josef; Christopher H Crane; Karyn A Goodman; Michael G Haddock; Joseph M Herman; Theodore S Hong; Lisa A Kachnic; Harvey J Mamon; Jason R Pantarotto; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-08-07

6.  Beam direction arrangement using a superconducting rotating gantry in carbon ion treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Woong Sub Koom; Shinichiro Mori; Wataru Furuich; Shigeru Yamada
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Pencil beam scanning versus passively scattered proton therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael Chuong; Shahed N Badiyan; Man Yam; Zuofeng Li; Katja Langen; William Regine; Christopher Morris; James Snider; Minesh Mehta; Soon Huh; Michael Rutenberg; Romaine C Nichols
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-08

8.  Dosimetric feasibility on hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy and simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Feng Teng; Lingling Meng; Fuhai Zhu; Gang Ren
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

9.  Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Combined With Chemotherapy for Unresected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Marie K Gurka; Christine Kim; Aiwu Ruth He; Aline Charabaty; Nadim Haddad; Jenna Turocy; Lynt Johnson; Patrick Jackson; Louis M Weiner; John L Marshall; Sean P Collins; Michael J Pishvaian; Keith Unger
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated and volumetric arc radiation therapy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhiping Li; Jianshuang Zeng; Zi Wang; Hong Zhu; Yuquan Wei
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.