INTRODUCTION: Goblet cells in Barrett's esophagus (BE) vary in their density within the Barrett's segment. Exposure of Barrett's epithelium to bile acids is a major stimulant for goblet cell formation. The dissociation of bile acids into forms that penetrate Barrett's epithelium is known to be pH dependent. We hypothesized that variations in the esophageal luminal pH environment explains the variability in goblet cell density. The aim of this study was to correlate esophageal luminal pH with goblet cell density in patients with BE. METHODS: A customized six-sensor pH catheter was positioned with the most distal sensor in the stomach and the remaining sensors located 1 cm below and 1, 3, 5, and 8 cm above the upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter in five normal subjects and six patients with long-segment BE. The luminal pH was measured by each sensor for 24-h and expressed as median pH. Patients with BE had four quadrant biopsies at levels corresponding to the location of the pH sensors. Goblet cell density was graded from 0 to 3 based on the number per high-power field. RESULTS: In normal subjects, the median pH values recorded in the sensors within the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body were all above 5. In patients with BE, the median pH recorded by the sensor within the LES was 2.8 and increased progressively to 4.7 in the sensor at 8 cm above the LES. Goblet cell density was significantly lower in the distal Barrett's segment exposed to a median pH of 2.2 and increased in the proximal Barrett's segment exposed to a median pH of 4.4 (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Patients with BE have a goblet cell gradient that correlates directly with an esophageal luminal pH gradient. This suggests that goblet cell differentiation is pH dependent and likely due to the effect of pH on bile acid dissociation.
INTRODUCTION: Goblet cells in Barrett's esophagus (BE) vary in their density within the Barrett's segment. Exposure of Barrett's epithelium to bile acids is a major stimulant for goblet cell formation. The dissociation of bile acids into forms that penetrate Barrett's epithelium is known to be pH dependent. We hypothesized that variations in the esophageal luminal pH environment explains the variability in goblet cell density. The aim of this study was to correlate esophageal luminal pH with goblet cell density in patients with BE. METHODS: A customized six-sensor pH catheter was positioned with the most distal sensor in the stomach and the remaining sensors located 1 cm below and 1, 3, 5, and 8 cm above the upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter in five normal subjects and six patients with long-segment BE. The luminal pH was measured by each sensor for 24-h and expressed as median pH. Patients with BE had four quadrant biopsies at levels corresponding to the location of the pH sensors. Goblet cell density was graded from 0 to 3 based on the number per high-power field. RESULTS: In normal subjects, the median pH values recorded in the sensors within the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body were all above 5. In patients with BE, the median pH recorded by the sensor within the LES was 2.8 and increased progressively to 4.7 in the sensor at 8 cm above the LES. Goblet cell density was significantly lower in the distal Barrett's segment exposed to a median pH of 2.2 and increased in the proximal Barrett's segment exposed to a median pH of 4.4 (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION:Patients with BE have a goblet cell gradient that correlates directly with an esophageal luminal pH gradient. This suggests that goblet cell differentiation is pH dependent and likely due to the effect of pH on bile acid dissociation.
Authors: M Umansky; W Yasui; A Hallak; S Brill; I Shapira; Z Halpern; H Hibshoosh; J Rattan; S Meltzer; E Tahara; N Arber Journal: Oncogene Date: 2001-11-29 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: G M Campos; S R DeMeester; J H Peters; S Oberg; P F Crookes; J A Hagen; C G Bremner; L F Sillin; R J Mason; T R DeMeester Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2001-11
Authors: C Möbius; H J Stein; C Spiess; I Becker; M Feith; J Theisen; P Gais; U Jütting; J R Siewert Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: James Cronin; Elizabeth McAdam; Antonios Danikas; Chris Tselepis; Paul Griffiths; John Baxter; Linzi Thomas; James Manson; Gareth Jenkins Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Jörg Theisen; Jeffrey H Peters; Martin Fein; Michael Hughes; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R Demeester; Tom R Demeester; Peter W Laird Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Shahin Ayazi; Jessica M Leers; Arzu Oezcelik; Emmanuele Abate; Christian G Peyre; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Farzaneh Banki; John C Lipham; Tom R DeMeester; Peter F Crookes Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-12-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Shahin Ayazi; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joerg Zehetner; Farzaneh Banki; Florian Augustin; Ali Ayazi; Steven R DeMeester; Daniel S Oh; Helen J Sohn; John C Lipham; Tom R DeMeester Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-02-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Stuart A C McDonald; Danielle Lavery; Nicholas A Wright; Marnix Jansen Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Corey S Johnson; Brian E Louie; Aaron Wille; Christy M Dunst; Stephanie G Worrell; Steven R DeMeester; Jessica Reynolds; Joe Dixon; John C Lipham; Michal Lada; Jeffrey H Peters; Thomas J Watson; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Benjamin Michael Allanson; Jessica Bonavita; Bob Mirzai; Tze Sheng Khor; Spiro C Raftopoulos; Willem Bastiaan de Boer; Ian S Brown; Marian Priyanthi Kumarasinghe Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Johannes Lenglinger; Stephanie Fischer See; Lukas Beller; Enrico P Cosentini; Reza Asari; Fritz Wrba; Martin Riegler; Sebastian F Schoppmann Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Melissa Schmidt; Richard J Hackett; Ann-Marie Baker; Stuart A C McDonald; Michael Quante; Trevor A Graham Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Stuart A C McDonald; Trevor A Graham; Danielle L Lavery; Nicholas A Wright; Marnix Jansen Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-11-12
Authors: Danielle L Lavery; Anna M Nicholson; Richard Poulsom; Rosemary Jeffery; Alia Hussain; Laura J Gay; Janusz A Jankowski; Sebastian S Zeki; Hugh Barr; Rebecca Harrison; James Going; Sritharan Kadirkamanathan; Peter Davis; Timothy Underwood; Marco R Novelli; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Neil Shepherd; Marnix Jansen; Nicholas A Wright; Stuart A C McDonald Journal: Gut Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 23.059