Literature DB >> 22095232

Disease stage predicts post-diagnosis anxiety and depression only in some types of cancer.

A Vodermaier1, W Linden, R MacKenzie, D Greig, C Marshall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesised that patients with advanced disease or a cancer type that has a poor prognosis may be more likely to report anxiety and depressive symptoms after diagnosis; younger age and female gender may moderate these effects.
METHODS: Patients (n=3850) were consecutively assessed with PSSCAN, a standardised, validated tool, at two large cancer centres between 2004 and 2009.
RESULTS: Female patients reported more anxiety and depressive symptoms (P=0.003 to P<0.001) compared with men and a healthy comparison group. Older age was associated with fewer anxiety (P=0.033 to P<0.001) and fewer depressive symptoms (P<0.001), but this was not true for lung cancer. Presence of metastases was associated with more anxiety symptoms in patients with gastrointestinal (P=0.044; R(2)Δ=0.001), lung (P=0.011; R(2)Δ=0.016), and prostate (P=0.032; R(2)Δ=0.008) cancer, but this was not true for breast cancer. Furthermore, early disease stage was associated with fewer depressive symptoms among older prostate cancer patients (P=0.021; R(2)Δ=0.008). Men with early lung cancer reported fewer anxiety (P=0.020; R(2)Δ=0.013) and depressive (P=0.017; R(2)Δ=0.016) symptoms than men with advanced disease or women.
CONCLUSION: As hypothesised, disease stage was directly associated with emotional distress, except for patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, age and gender moderated some of these effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22095232      PMCID: PMC3251893          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


A recent meta-analysis (Singer ) has shown that approximately one-third of patients with cancer suffer from a mental disorder at various stages in the disease trajectory. Given that patients are remarkably heterogeneous in how they respond emotionally to cancer diagnosis and treatment, person and disease characteristics need to be identified that can best explain differential levels of emotional distress. Several small- and medium-scale studies on this topic exist and have for example revealed particularly high levels of depression in patients with lung cancer (Hopwood and Stephens, 2000; Néron ; Castelli ), but comparison studies with sufficient statistical power to examine various potential predictor and moderator variables are scarce. Consequently, we examined relationships of disease stage, age, gender, and their interactions on anxiety and depressive symptoms after diagnosis in a large cohort of cancer patients of four common types of cancers, namely gastrointestinal (GI), lung, breast, and prostate cancer. These distinct cancer types vary in terms of their prognosis as well as the specific implications and subjectively perceived threats of the disease. Based on the current status quo of the literature, we hypothesised that: (1) female cancer patients will report more anxiety and depressive symptoms than men, (2) both anxiety and depressive symptoms will be higher when the disease is metastasised and the disease has a poor prognosis such as lung cancer, and (3) age and gender moderate the relationship between disease stage and anxiety and depressive symptoms such that younger age and female gender are associated with higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms in advanced disease.

Materials and methods

Procedures

The data were collected via a routine screening programme and represent a subsample of a previous, large sample study reporting levels of anxiety and depression of a mixed patient cohort (Vodermaier ). For 5139 of the original sample of 10 153 patients (50.6% Vodermaier ), reliable information on metastasis stage (M0 vs M1) was available, and 4156 of these patients belonged to one of the four cancer types under study. Differences in demographic and psychological variables between the total sample and the subsample under study were very minor. Incomplete clinical data may be affected by varying degrees of physician ‘buy-in’ to the electronic record system. Completion rates for psychological assessment are estimated to be ∼90% based on previous studies. Only the data on breast, GI, lung, and prostate cancer patients were of interest in the present study to assure adequate statistical power for the conduct of interaction tests among hypothesised determinants of distress.

Measure

The 21-item Psychosocial Screen for Cancer (PSSCAN) (Linden , 2009) assesses anxiety and depressive symptoms and was specifically developed for use with cancer patients. Details on the questionnaire's reliability and validity including empirically derived cutoffs and norms have been reported (Linden , 2009).

Statistical analysis

One-sample and independent-sample t-tests, ANOVAs, and χ2 tests were conducted to test differences and associations between groups and for comparisons with normative data. For prediction of anxiety and depressive symptoms, hierarchical linear regression was chosen because of unequal and empty cell distributions. First, demographic predictors (age, gender (if applicable)), then early vs advanced disease (M0 vs M1 also referred to as ‘disease stage’), and finally the interaction terms of disease stage by age and disease stage by gender (if applicable) were entered. Simple slope tests were conducted to test for the significance of eventual interaction effects. All statistical tests were two sided and considered significant at P<0.05.

Results

Sample

Patients were 60.7 years of age on average; 65% of the sample was female. The proportion of patients with advanced disease was 12.7% across all cancer types (49.0% of lung, 24.9% for GI, 2.6% for breast, and 6.3% for prostate cancer).

Anxiety and disease stage

Mean levels of anxiety were in the subclinical range. Women reported more anxiety than men (22.4% vs 11.6% Figure 1).
Figure 1

Means and prevalence rates of clinical anxiety by tumour type, stage, and gender. aThe difference from the grand mean. bThe difference between patients diagnosed primary metastasised vs not within each subcategory. cPercentage of patients scoring above the clinical threshold of 11. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 on t-test.

In patients with GI cancers, younger age (β=−0.042, P=0.001), female gender (β=−0.829, P<0.001), and advanced disease stage (β=0.568, P=0.044) were associated with more symptoms of anxiety (R2=0.045; Table 1).
Table 1

Results of hierarchical linear regression modelling

    Anxiety
Depression
Cancer type   Variables β P R2Δ R 2 β P R2Δ R 2
Gastrointestinal1Age−0.043<0.0010.0380.038−0.030<0.0010.0280.028
  Gender−0.8140.001  −0.5330.008  
 2Age−0.042<0.0010.0050.043−0.030<0.0010.0030.031
  Gender−0.8290.001  −0.5420.007  
  Disease stage0.5680.044  3.820.097  
 3Age−0.0300.4010.0030.045−0.0380.2010.0020.033
  Gender−10.028<0.001  −0.6950.003  
  Disease stage0.0700.876  −0.0020.997  
  Disease stage × age−0.0070.734  0.0050.781  
  Disease stage × gender0.8280.150  0.6320.179  
           
Lung1Age−0.0500.0180.0680.068−0.0300.0790.0500.050
  Gender−20.097<0.001  −1.481<0.001  
 2Age−0.0450.0330.0160.084−0.0280.1070.0070.056
  Gender−2.150<0.001  −1.507<0.001  
  Disease stage1.1740.011  0.6030.109  
 3Age−0.0660.3420.0130.098−0.0020.9690.0160.072
  Gender−3.138<0.001  −2.349<0.001  
  Disease stage0.0080.990  −0.3620.510  
  Disease stage × age0.0120.777  −0.0180.614  
  Disease stage × gender2.1340.020  1.7910.017  
           
Breast1Age−0.064<0.0010.0410.041−0.043<0.0010.0250.025
 2Age−0.064<0.0010.0020.043−0.043<0.0010.0000.026
  Disease stage0.9990.064  0.4620.318  
 3Age−0.063<0.0010.0010.044−0.043<0.0010.0000.026
  Disease stage1.1550.035  0.5150.273  
  Disease stage × age−0.0830.084  −0.0270.508  
           
Prostate1Age−0.053<0.0010.0280.028−0.046<0.0010.0320.032
 2Age−0.055<0.0010.0080.036−0.048<0.0010.0160.048
  Disease stage10.0290.021  1.1690.001  
 3Age−0.057<0.0010.0010.036−0.055<0.0010.0080.056
  Disease stage0.9760.032  10.0070.006  
  Disease stage × age0.0270.541  0.0830.019  
Lung cancer patients were more anxious compared with the total sample and represented the most anxious group among the four types of cancers investigated. Younger age (β=−0.045, P=0.033), female gender (β=−2.150, P<0.001), and advanced disease stage (β=1.174, P=0.011) were associated with more symptoms. Men with early disease were the least anxious (β=2.134, P=0.020, R2=0.098). Although presence of metastasis predicted levels of anxiety in men (β=2.189, P<0.001), this relationship was not significant for women with lung cancer (β=0.171, P=0.829). Mean levels of anxiety in breast cancer patients were higher than in the total sample (t(1680)=4.50, P<0.001) and higher than for prostate and GI, but lower than lung cancer. Younger age (β=−0.063, P<0.001) predicted higher levels of anxiety (R2=0.044), but neither disease stage (metastasis yes/no) nor its interaction with age were significant. Men with prostate cancer showed the lowest mean levels of anxiety compared with the total sample (t(743)=−12.8, P<0.001) and all other cancer types. Younger age (β=−0.055, P<0.001) and advanced disease stage (β=−1.029, P=0.021) were independently associated with higher levels of anxiety (R2=0.036).

Depression and disease stage

Mean depression levels of the total sample were slightly below the subclinical threshold (Figure 2). Women were more depressed than men (15.9 vs 7.7%).
Figure 2

Means and prevalence rates of clinical depression by tumour type, stage, and gender. aThe difference from the grand mean. bThe difference between patients diagnosed primary metastasised vs not within each subcategory. cPercentage of patients scoring above the clinical threshold of 11. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 on t-test.

Patients with GI cancers showed comparable rates of depression to that of the total sample, less than breast and lung cancer patients, but more than prostate cancer patients (F(3, 3564)=365.4, P<0.001). Younger age (β=−0.030, P<0.001) and female gender (β=−0.542, P=0.007) were associated with higher levels of depression (R2=0.033). Lung cancer patients were more depressed than other types of cancer except for breast cancer. Female patients were more depressed (β=−1.507, P<0.001). Gender also moderated effects of disease stage on depression (β=1.791, P=0.017) such that men with lung cancer who had early disease experienced the lowest levels of depression (R2=0.072). Disease stage predicted depression in men (β=1.465, P<0.001) but not in women with lung cancer (β=−0.288, P=0.660). In breast cancer patients, younger age predicted depressive symptoms (β=−0.043, P<0.001), but disease stage was unrelated (R2=0.026). Men with prostate cancer showed the lowest mean depression levels. Depression was related to younger age (β=−0.055, P<0.001) and presence of metastases (β=1.007, P=0.006). Older age predicted less depressive symptoms in early (β=−0.055, P<0.001) but not in advanced disease (β=0.027, P=0.529) (R2=0.056).

Discussion

Cancer site, cancer stage (defined as presence/absence of metastases), age, and gender were associated with different levels of distress but there was no simple, uniform pattern of results. Consistent with predictions, distress was highest in lung cancer patients, which is largely attributable to the high prevalence of metastasised tumours and the poor prognosis. Beyond that, men with early stage lung cancer experienced fewer anxiety and depressive symptoms compared with men with advanced disease or women independent of their disease stage. This interaction effect, although small in nature, has been identified here for the first time. Surprisingly, presence of metastases was not associated with anxiety and depression in women with breast or GI cancer. This result is inconsistent with a previous study (Simon ) where it had been shown that in one GI subtype, colon cancer, female patients were more depressed when they had advanced disease. Overall, our findings indicate that cancer type may exert a strong influence on the relationship between disease stage and anxiety or depression. Although the role of gender as a moderator could only be directly studied in two cancer types, results of sex-specific cancers as breast and prostate cancer also support the notion that men and women adjust differently to the provision of prognostic information. Normative data for PSSCAN obtained from a healthy cohort (Linden ) revealed no difference when contrasted with our cancer samples relative to the effects of gender or age on anxiety, and gender on depression. This observation supports the interpretation that the effects seen here are indeed specific to certain types of cancer. Thus older patients report less distress following a diagnosis of cancer. The fact that age was unrelated to depression in lung cancer may be attributable to the particularly poor prognosis. In contrast, in breast cancer patients, younger age is a well-known risk factor for emotional distress (Ell ; Mehnert and Koch, 2008), and is associated with other factors arising as a consequence of treatment such as threats to body image, sexuality, and fertility, which are interrelated with the age of patients. The explained variance ranged from 3 to 10% and was highest for prediction of anxiety in lung cancer patients. Apart from cancer site-specific effects, a number of other intraindividual factors not measured here may affect a differential patient stress response. Among these factors are premorbid psychological functioning, cognitions about the meaning of the disease, threat to length of life, threat of anticipated side effects of treatment, or anticipated suffering. Whether the observed differential relationships of disease stage and the psychological adjustment in certain types of cancer are stable across the entire cancer trajectory awaits further empirical investigation.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the British Columbia Cancer Agency.
  9 in total

1.  Prevalence of mental health conditions in cancer patients in acute care--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Singer; J Das-Munshi; E Brähler
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Depression, correlates of depression, and receipt of depression care among low-income women with breast or gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen Ell; Kathleen Sanchez; Betsy Vourlekis; Pey-Jiuan Lee; Megan Dwight-Johnson; Isabel Lagomasino; Laila Muderspach; Christy Russell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Depression in patients with lung cancer: prevalence and risk factors derived from quality-of-life data.

Authors:  P Hopwood; R J Stephens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Screening for depressive symptoms in patients with unresectable lung cancer.

Authors:  S Néron; J A Correa; E Dajczman; G Kasymjanova; H Kreisman; D Small
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Depression in lung cancer patients: is the HADS an effective screening tool?

Authors:  Lorys Castelli; Luca Binaschi; Paola Caldera; Riccardo Torta
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Disease stage and psychosocial outcomes in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A E Simon; M R Thompson; K Flashman; J Wardle
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Psychological comorbidity and health-related quality of life and its association with awareness, utilization, and need for psychosocial support in a cancer register-based sample of long-term breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Anja Mehnert; Uwe Koch
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Development and validation of a psychosocial screening instrument for cancer.

Authors:  Wolfgang Linden; Dahyun Yi; Maria Cristina Barroetavena; Regina MacKenzie; Richard Doll
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  The psychosocial screen for cancer (PSSCAN): further validation and normative data.

Authors:  Wolfgang Linden; A Andrea Vodermaier; Regina McKenzie; Maria C Barroetavena; Dahyun Yi; Richard Doll
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.186

  9 in total
  33 in total

1.  Emotional adjustment over 1 year post-diagnosis in patients with cancer: understanding and predicting adjustment trajectories.

Authors:  W Linden; R MacKenzie; K Rnic; C Marshall; A Vodermaier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Baseline and follow-up association of the MAX-PC in Men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea M Tavlarides; Steven C Ames; David D Thiel; Nancy N Diehl; Alexander S Parker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  The Age Conundrum: A Scoping Review of Younger Age or Adolescent and Young Adult as a Risk Factor for Clinical Distress, Depression, or Anxiety in Cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Lang; Victoria David; Janine Giese-Davis
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Worried together: a qualitative study of shared anxiety in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and their family caregivers.

Authors:  Ellen Hendriksen; Emma Williams; Nora Sporn; Joseph Greer; Alexandra DeGrange; Cheryl Koopman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Coping strategies and depressive symptoms in cancer patients.

Authors:  I Ghanem; B Castelo; P Jimenez-Fonseca; A Carmona-Bayonas; O Higuera; C Beato; T García; R Hernández; C Calderon
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Predictors of anxiety and depression in people with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicola M Gray; Susan J Hall; Susan Browne; Marie Johnston; Amanda J Lee; Una Macleod; Elizabeth D Mitchell; Leslie Samuel; Neil C Campbell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Depression as mediator and or moderator on the relationship between hopelessness and patients' desire for hastened death.

Authors:  Efi Parpa; Eleni Tsilika; Antonis Galanos; Maria Nikoloudi; Kyriaki Mystakidou
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Prevalence of anxiety and depression and their risk factors in Chinese cancer patients.

Authors:  Jin Sheng Hong; Jun Tian
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Exploring clinical determinants and anxiety symptom domains among Asian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yin Ting Cheung; Helen Hoi-Lun Lee; Alexandre Chan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  The prevalence of anxiety and depression and its association with coping strategies, supportive care needs, and social support among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Hassan Okati-Aliabad; Alireza Ansari-Moghadam; Mahdi Mohammadi; Shiva Kargar; Fariba Shahraki-Sanavi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.