PURPOSE: To examine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of dopamine transporter SPECT imaging with a highly dopamine transporter selective radioligand. The study included consecutively enrolled, drug-naive patients with an average short history of parkinsonian motor symptoms, referred for diagnostic scanning. METHODS: The study group comprised 288 patients naive to antiparkinson treatment who were enrolled as they were admitted for a diagnostic SPECT scan with the radioligand [(123)I]-N-(3-iodoprop-2E-enyl)-2-β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-methylphenyl)nortropane ((123)I-PE2I). After the diagnostic scanning, patients were followed clinically with an average follow-up of 19.7 ± 12.5 months. RESULTS: A diagnosis could be clinically settled in 189 patients and among these patients, a dopamine transporter scan had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 91% for discrimination between patients with and without striatal neurodegeneration. In cognitively impaired patients (Mini Mental State Examination <27) the specificity was 75% and the sensitivity 95%. A striatal anterior-posterior ratio (APR) of >2 differentiated between idiopathic Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes with a specificity of 84% and a sensitivity of 63%. CONCLUSION: In drug-naive patients with subtle clinical parkinsonian motor symptoms, dopamine transporter scan using (123)I-PE21 has a high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between patients with and without striatal neurodegeneration. The specificity is lower in patients who are also cognitively impaired. Calculation of the striatal APR can assist in differentiating between idiopathic Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes.
PURPOSE: To examine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of dopamine transporter SPECT imaging with a highly dopamine transporter selective radioligand. The study included consecutively enrolled, drug-naive patients with an average short history of parkinsonian motor symptoms, referred for diagnostic scanning. METHODS: The study group comprised 288 patients naive to antiparkinson treatment who were enrolled as they were admitted for a diagnostic SPECT scan with the radioligand [(123)I]-N-(3-iodoprop-2E-enyl)-2-β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-methylphenyl)nortropane ((123)I-PE2I). After the diagnostic scanning, patients were followed clinically with an average follow-up of 19.7 ± 12.5 months. RESULTS: A diagnosis could be clinically settled in 189 patients and among these patients, a dopamine transporter scan had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 91% for discrimination between patients with and without striatal neurodegeneration. In cognitively impairedpatients (Mini Mental State Examination <27) the specificity was 75% and the sensitivity 95%. A striatal anterior-posterior ratio (APR) of >2 differentiated between idiopathic Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes with a specificity of 84% and a sensitivity of 63%. CONCLUSION: In drug-naive patients with subtle clinical parkinsonian motor symptoms, dopamine transporter scan using (123)I-PE21 has a high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between patients with and without striatal neurodegeneration. The specificity is lower in patients who are also cognitively impaired. Calculation of the striatal APR can assist in differentiating between idiopathic Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes.
Authors: Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Lars H Pinborg; Morten Ziebell; Vibe G Frøkjaer; Robin de Nijs; Claus Svarer; Steven Haugbøl; Stig Yndgaard; Gitte M Knudsen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Vicky L Marshall; Cornelia B Reininger; Moritz Marquardt; Jim Patterson; Donald M Hadley; Wolfgang H Oertel; Hani T S Benamer; Paul Kemp; David Burn; Eduardo Tolosa; Jamie Kulisevsky; Luis Cunha; Durval Costa; Jan Booij; Klaus Tatsch; K Ray Chaudhuri; Gudrun Ulm; Oliver Pogarell; Helmut Höffken; Anja Gerstner; Donald G Grosset Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: S Gilman; G K Wenning; P A Low; D J Brooks; C J Mathias; J Q Trojanowski; N W Wood; C Colosimo; A Dürr; C J Fowler; H Kaufmann; T Klockgether; A Lees; W Poewe; N Quinn; T Revesz; D Robertson; P Sandroni; K Seppi; M Vidailhet Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-08-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ralph Buchert; Carsten Buhmann; Ivayla Apostolova; Philipp T Meyer; Jürgen Gallinat Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Sven R Suwijn; Caroline Jm van Boheemen; Rob J de Haan; Gerrit Tissingh; Jan Booij; Rob Ma de Bie Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Monique R Bernsen; Pieter E B Vaissier; Roel Van Holen; Jan Booij; Freek J Beekman; Marion de Jong Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 9.236