UNLABELLED: The aim of the present study was to describe a method combining easy implementation in a clinical setting with accuracy and precision in quantification of 123I-labeled N-(3-iodoprop-(2E)-enyl)-2beta-carboxymethoxy-3beta-(4'-methylphenyl)nortropane (PE2I) binding to brain dopamine transporter. METHODS: Five healthy subjects (mean age, 50 y; range, 40-68 y) were studied twice. In the first experiment, dynamic SPECT data and arterial plasma input curves obtained after 123I-PE2I bolus injection were assessed using Logan, kinetic, transient equilibrium, and peak equilibrium analyses. Accurate and precise determination of BP1 (binding potential times the free fraction in the metabolite-corrected plasma compartment) and BP2 (binding potential times the free fraction in the intracerebral nonspecifically bound compartment) was achieved using Logan analysis and kinetic analysis, with a total study time of 90 min. In the second experiment, (123)I-PE2I was administrated as a combined bolus and constant infusion. The bolus was equivalent to 2.7 h of constant infusion. RESULTS: The bolus-to-infusion ratio of 2.7 h was based on the average terminal clearance rate from plasma in the bolus experiments. Steady state was attained in brain and plasma within 2 h, and time-activity curves remained constant for another 2 h. Even when an average bolus-to-infusion ratio was used, the striatal BP1 and BP2 values calculated with kinetic analysis (BP1 = 21.1 +/- 1.1; BP2 = 4.1 +/- 0.4) did not significantly differ from those calculated with bolus/infusion analysis (BP1 = 21.0 +/- 1.2; BP2 = 4.3 +/- 0.3). Computer simulations confirmed that a 2-fold difference in terminal clearance rate from plasma translates into only a 10% difference in BP1 and BP2 calculated from 120 to 180 min after tracer administration. CONCLUSION: The bolus/infusion approach allows accurate and precise quantification of 123I-PE2I binding to dopamine transporter and is easily implemented in a clinical setting.
UNLABELLED: The aim of the present study was to describe a method combining easy implementation in a clinical setting with accuracy and precision in quantification of 123I-labeled N-(3-iodoprop-(2E)-enyl)-2beta-carboxymethoxy-3beta-(4'-methylphenyl)nortropane (PE2I) binding to brain dopamine transporter. METHODS: Five healthy subjects (mean age, 50 y; range, 40-68 y) were studied twice. In the first experiment, dynamic SPECT data and arterial plasma input curves obtained after 123I-PE2I bolus injection were assessed using Logan, kinetic, transient equilibrium, and peak equilibrium analyses. Accurate and precise determination of BP1 (binding potential times the free fraction in the metabolite-corrected plasma compartment) and BP2 (binding potential times the free fraction in the intracerebral nonspecifically bound compartment) was achieved using Logan analysis and kinetic analysis, with a total study time of 90 min. In the second experiment, (123)I-PE2I was administrated as a combined bolus and constant infusion. The bolus was equivalent to 2.7 h of constant infusion. RESULTS: The bolus-to-infusion ratio of 2.7 h was based on the average terminal clearance rate from plasma in the bolus experiments. Steady state was attained in brain and plasma within 2 h, and time-activity curves remained constant for another 2 h. Even when an average bolus-to-infusion ratio was used, the striatal BP1 and BP2 values calculated with kinetic analysis (BP1 = 21.1 +/- 1.1; BP2 = 4.1 +/- 0.4) did not significantly differ from those calculated with bolus/infusion analysis (BP1 = 21.0 +/- 1.2; BP2 = 4.3 +/- 0.3). Computer simulations confirmed that a 2-fold difference in terminal clearance rate from plasma translates into only a 10% difference in BP1 and BP2 calculated from 120 to 180 min after tracer administration. CONCLUSION: The bolus/infusion approach allows accurate and precise quantification of 123I-PE2I binding to dopamine transporter and is easily implemented in a clinical setting.
Authors: Morten Ziebell; Gerda Thomsen; Gitte M Knudsen; Robin de Nijs; Claus Svarer; Aase Wagner; Lars H Pinborg Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-07-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Mathias E Jensen; Aurelio Galli; Morgane Thomsen; Kathrine L Jensen; Gerda K Thomsen; Mette K Klausen; Tina Vilsbøll; Mikkel B Christensen; Jens J Holst; Anthony Owens; Sabrina Robertson; Lynette Daws; Daniele Zanella; Ulrik Gether; Gitte M Knudsen; Anders Fink-Jensen Journal: Neurochem Int Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 3.921