Literature DB >> 22094935

A comparative biomarker study of 514 matched cases of male and female breast cancer reveals gender-specific biological differences.

Abeer M Shaaban1, Graham R Ball, Rebecca A Brannan, Gabor Cserni, Anna Di Benedetto, Jo Dent, Laura Fulford, Helen Honarpisheh, Lee Jordan, J Louise Jones, Rani Kanthan, Loaie Maraqa, Maria Litwiniuk, Marcella Mottolese, Steven Pollock, Elena Provenzano, Philip R Quinlan, Georgina Reall, Sami Shousha, Mark Stephens, Eldo T Verghese, Rosemary A Walker, Andrew M Hanby, Valerie Speirs.   

Abstract

Male breast cancer remains understudied despite evidence of rising incidence. Using a co-ordinated multi-centre approach, we present the first large scale biomarker study to define and compare hormone receptor profiles and survival between male and female invasive breast cancer. We defined and compared hormone receptor profiles and survival between 251 male and 263 female breast cancers matched for grade, age, and lymph node status. Tissue microarrays were immunostained for ERα, ERβ1, -2, -5, PR, PRA, PRB and AR, augmented by HER2, CK5/6, 14, 18 and 19 to assist typing. Hierarchical clustering determined differential nature of influences between genders. Luminal A was the most common phenotype in both sexes. Luminal B and HER2 were not seen in males. Basal phenotype was infrequent in both. No differences in overall survival at 5 or 10 years were observed between genders. Notably, AR-positive luminal A male breast cancer had improved overall survival over female breast cancer at 5 (P = 0.01, HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.26-0.87) but not 10 years (P = 0.29, HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.46-1.26) and both 5 (P = 0.04, HR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.07-0.97) and 10 years (P = 0.04, HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.12-0.97) in the unselected group. Hierarchical clustering revealed common clusters between genders including total PR-PRA-PRB and ERβ1/2 clusters. A striking feature was the occurrence of ERα on distinct clusters between genders. In female breast cancer, ERα clustered with PR and its isoforms; in male breast cancer, ERα clustered with ERβ isoforms and AR. Our data supports the hypothesis that breast cancer is biologically different in males and females suggesting implications for clinical management. With the incidence of male breast cancer increasing this provides impetus for further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22094935     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1856-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  39 in total

1.  Male breast carcinoma: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characterization study.

Authors:  Ruoji Zhou; Lin Yu; Shuling Zhou; Rui Bi; Ruohong Shui; Baohua Yu; Hongfen Lu; Xu Cai; Wentao Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

2.  The Management and Outcomes of Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ömer Uslukaya; Metehan Gümüş; Hatice Gümüş; Zübeyir Bozdağ; Ahmet Türkoğlu
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-10-01

3.  Male Breast Cancer Has Limited Effect on Survivor's Perceptions of Their Own Masculinity.

Authors:  Sarah Rayne; Kathryn Schnippel; John Thomson; Joanna Reid; Carol Benn
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-06-23

4.  Characterization of male breast cancer: results of the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NABCG International Male Breast Cancer Program.

Authors:  F Cardoso; J M S Bartlett; L Slaets; C H M van Deurzen; E van Leeuwen-Stok; P Porter; B Linderholm; I Hedenfalk; C Schröder; J Martens; J Bayani; C van Asperen; M Murray; C Hudis; L Middleton; J Vermeij; K Punie; J Fraser; M Nowaczyk; I T Rubio; S Aebi; C Kelly; K J Ruddy; E Winer; C Nilsson; L Dal Lago; L Korde; K Benstead; O Bogler; T Goulioti; A Peric; S Litière; K C Aalders; C Poncet; K Tryfonidis; S H Giordano
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Tumor subtypes and survival in male breast cancer.

Authors:  Julieta Leone; Rachel A Freedman; Nancy U Lin; Sara M Tolaney; Carlos T Vallejo; Bernardo A Leone; Eric P Winer; José Pablo Leone
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Intratumoral estrogen concentration and expression of estrogen-induced genes in male breast carcinoma: comparison with female breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Takagi; Takuya Moriya; Masafumi Kurosumi; Kimako Oka; Yasuhiro Miki; Akiko Ebata; Takashi Toshima; Shoji Tsunekawa; Hiroyuki Takei; Hisashi Hirakawa; Takanori Ishida; Shin-Ichi Hayashi; Junichi Kurebayashi; Hironobu Sasano; Takashi Suzuki
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.869

7.  Male breast cancer - a single center experience.

Authors:  Branislav Bystricky; Filip Kohutek; Andrej Rosik
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  An international comparison of male and female breast cancer incidence rates.

Authors:  Diana Ly; David Forman; Jacques Ferlay; Louise A Brinton; Michael B Cook
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Male breast cancer: correlation between immunohistochemical subtyping and PAM50 intrinsic subtypes, and the subsequent clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz; Luis Vicioso; Angela Santonja; Martina Álvarez; Yéssica Plata-Fernández; José Miramón; Irene Zarcos; César L Ramírez-Tortosa; Julio Montes-Torres; José M Jerez; Vanessa de Luque; Casilda Llácer; Cristina E Fernández-De Sousa; Lidia Pérez-Villa; Emilio Alba
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Favorable Long-Term Outcome in Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Enver Özkurt; Mustafa Tükenmez; Ravza Yılmaz; Neslihan Cabioğlu; Mahmut Müslümanoğlu; Ahmet Said Dinççağ; Abdullah İğci; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.