Literature DB >> 29092024

Characterization of male breast cancer: results of the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NABCG International Male Breast Cancer Program.

F Cardoso1, J M S Bartlett2, L Slaets3, C H M van Deurzen4, E van Leeuwen-Stok5, P Porter6, B Linderholm7, I Hedenfalk8, C Schröder9, J Martens10, J Bayani11, C van Asperen12, M Murray13, C Hudis14, L Middleton15, J Vermeij16, K Punie17, J Fraser18, M Nowaczyk19, I T Rubio20, S Aebi21, C Kelly22, K J Ruddy23, E Winer24, C Nilsson25, L Dal Lago26, L Korde27, K Benstead28, O Bogler29, T Goulioti30, A Peric3, S Litière3, K C Aalders3, C Poncet3, K Tryfonidis3, S H Giordano31.   

Abstract

Background: Male breast cancer (BC) is rare, managed by extrapolation from female BC. The International Male BC Program aims to better characterize and manage this disease. We report the results of part I, a retrospective joint analysis of cases diagnosed during a 20-year period.
Methods: Patients with follow-up and tumor samples, treated between 1990 and 2010, in 93 centers/9 countries. Samples were centrally analyzed in three laboratories (the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and the United States).
Results: Of 1822 patients enrolled, 1483 were analyzed; 63.5% were diagnosed between 2001 and 2010, 57 (5.1%) had metastatic disease (M1). Median age at diagnosis: 68.4 years. Of 1054 M0 cases, 56.2% were node-negative (N0) and 48.5% had T1 tumors; 4% had breast conserving surgery (BCS), 18% sentinel lymph-node biopsy; half received adjuvant radiotherapy; 29.8% (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and 76.8% adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), mostly tamoxifen (88.4%). Per central pathology, for M0 tumors: 84.8% ductal invasive carcinomas, 51.5% grade 2; 99.3% estrogen receptor (ER)-positive; 81.9% progesterone receptor (PR)-positive; 96.9% androgen receptor (AR)-positive [ER, PR or AR Allred score ≥3]; 61.1% Ki67 expression low (<14% positive cells); using immunohistochemistry (IHC) surrogates, 41.9% were Luminal-A-like, 48.6% Luminal-B-like/HER-2-negative, 8.7% HER-2-positive, 0.3% triple negative. Median follow-up: 8.2 years (0.0-23.8) for all, 7.2 years (0.0-23.2), for M0, 2.6 years (0.0-12.7) for M1 patients. A significant improvement over time was observed in age-corrected BC mortality. BC-specific-mortality was higher for men younger than 50 years. Better overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were observed for highly ER+ (P = 0.001), highly PR+ (P = 0.002), highly AR+ disease (P = 0.019). There was no association between OS/RFS and HER-2 status, Ki67, IHC subtypes nor grade. Conclusions: Male BC is usually ER, PR and AR-positive, Luminal B-like/HER2-negative. Of note, 56% patients had T1 tumors but only 4% had BCS. ER was highly positive in >90% of cases but only 77% received adjuvant ET. ER, PR and AR were associated with OS and RFS, whereas grade, Ki67 and IHC surrogates were not. Significant improvement in survival over time was observed.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29092024      PMCID: PMC5834077          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  37 in total

Review 1.  Strategies in treating male breast cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Cutuli
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.889

2.  The rising incidence of male breast cancer.

Authors:  Valerie Speirs; Abeer M Shaaban
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Breast cancer in men in the United States: a population-based study of diagnosis, treatment, and survival.

Authors:  Linda C Harlan; Jo Anne Zujewski; Marc T Goodman; Jennifer L Stevens
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Lobular carcinoma of the breast in a patient with Klinefelter's syndrome. A case with bilateral, synchronous, histologically different breast tumors.

Authors:  A G Sanchez; A G Villanueva; C Redondo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Membranous and cytoplasmic staining of Ki67 is associated with HER2 and ER status in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Dana Faratian; Alison Munro; Christopher Twelves; John M S Bartlett
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Breast carcinoma in men: a population-based study.

Authors:  Sharon H Giordano; Deborah S Cohen; Aman U Buzdar; George Perkins; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Cancer risks for male carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexander Liede; Beth Y Karlan; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Gene expression profiling of primary male breast cancers reveals two unique subgroups and identifies N-acetyltransferase-1 (NAT1) as a novel prognostic biomarker.

Authors:  Ida Johansson; Cecilia Nilsson; Pontus Berglund; Martin Lauss; Markus Ringnér; Håkan Olsson; Lena Luts; Edith Sim; Sten Thorstensson; Marie-Louise Fjällskog; Ingrid Hedenfalk
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  Male breast carcinoma: increased awareness needed.

Authors:  Jonathan White; Olive Kearins; David Dodwell; Kieran Horgan; Andrew M Hanby; Valerie Speirs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3).

Authors:  F Cardoso; A Costa; E Senkus; M Aapro; F André; C H Barrios; J Bergh; G Bhattacharyya; L Biganzoli; M J Cardoso; L Carey; D Corneliussen-James; G Curigliano; V Dieras; N El Saghir; A Eniu; L Fallowfield; D Fenech; P Francis; K Gelmon; A Gennari; N Harbeck; C Hudis; B Kaufman; I Krop; M Mayer; H Meijer; S Mertz; S Ohno; O Pagani; E Papadopoulos; F Peccatori; F Penault-Llorca; M J Piccart; J Y Pierga; H Rugo; L Shockney; G Sledge; S Swain; C Thomssen; A Tutt; D Vorobiof; B Xu; L Norton; E Winer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  76 in total

Review 1.  An updated review of epidemiology, risk factors, and management of male breast cancer.

Authors:  Noman Ahmed Jang Khan; Maria Tirona
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Nipple changes in an 85-year-old man.

Authors:  Chandler S Cortina; Andrea Madrigrano
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Is Breast-Conserving Therapy Appropriate for Male Breast Cancer Patients? A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah B Bateni; Anders J Davidson; Mili Arora; Megan E Daly; Susan L Stewart; Richard J Bold; Robert J Canter; Candice A M Sauder
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Fertility preservation in breast cancer with case-based examples for guidance.

Authors:  Mary E Hampe; Alice S Rhoton-Vlasak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Exclusion of Men from Randomized Phase III Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Kelsey L Corrigan; Walker Mainwaring; Austin B Miller; Timothy A Lin; Amit Jethanandani; Andres F Espinoza; Matt Piotrowski; C David Fuller; Michael C Stauder; Simona F Shaitelman; George H Perkins; Wendy A Woodward; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith; Ethan B Ludmir
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-04-28

6.  Serum Proteomic Signatures of Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eleni Zografos; Athanasios K Anagnostopoulos; Aggeliki Papadopoulou; Evangelia Legaki; Flora Zagouri; Evangelos Marinos; George T Tsangaris; Maria Gazouli
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.069

7.  The prognostic significance of metastatic pattern in stage IV male breast cancer at initial diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  José Pablo Leone; Bernardo Amadeo Leone; Ariel O Zwenger; Carlos Teodoro Vallejo; Alberto Omar Romero; Mario Raúl Machiavelli; Juan Eduardo Pérez; Julieta Leone
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Surgery for Men with Breast Cancer: Do the Same Data Still Apply?

Authors:  Jennifer K Plichta; Yi Ren; Caitlin E Marks; Samantha M Thomas; Rachel A Greenup; Laura H Rosenberger; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Susan G R McDuff; E Shelley Hwang; Jeremy Force
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in The Male Breast: A Rare Entity.

Authors:  Saida Sakhri; Olfa Jaidane; Malek Bouhani; Olfa Adouni; Salma Kammoun; Riadh Chargui; Khaled Rahal
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-12-05

10.  Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between men and women with breast cancer: a retrospective study using nationwide inpatient data in Japan.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Kojiro Morita; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.