Literature DB >> 22094560

Biofilm growth on implants: bacteria prefer plasma coats.

Christof Wagner1, Sara Aytac, G Maria Hänsch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bacterial biofilm formation on prostheses or devices used for osteosynthesis is increasingly recognized as cause of persistent infections, an entity known as implant-associated posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Biofilm formation is a very complex, multistep process with adhesion as the first and decisive step. The most prevalent pathogens found are staphylococci species, especially S. aureus, presumably due to a preference to non-biological materials, such as metal. Adherence is influenced by several factors, including the microenvironment, in which blood proteins from serum or plasma might influence adhesion and maybe biofilm formation. The aim of the present study was to test and to compare adherence of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa to different biological and non-biological surfaces in vitro. The question was addressed if coating of the surface by plasma or serum proteins influences bacterial adherence.
METHODS: Adherence of radiolabeled bacteria to different surfaces in the presence or absence or serum/plasma proteins was measured over time.
RESULTS: When testing adherence of S. aureus to plastic, titanium or to monolayers of epithelial cells (A549) or fibroblasts (Colo800) a clear-cut preference for non-biological surfaces, especially for titanium was seen. Using P. aeruginosa species a similar pattern without a significant difference was revealed. When mimicking the in vivo situation by pre-coating of titanium with human serum or plasma adherence was increased, especially when titanium was coated ("opsonized") by plasma.
CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial adherence to surfaces is determined by a variety of factors such as temperature, the presence of nutrients, the absence of host defense systems and the configuration of the covered surface. In vivo, adherence to non-biological surfaces is also influenced by the microenvironment, especially plasma proteins, promoting biofilm formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22094560     DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  14 in total

Review 1.  [The significance of biofilm for the treatment of infections in orthopedic surgery : 2017 Update].

Authors:  C Scheuermann-Poley; C Wagner; J Hoffmann; A Moter; C Willy
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  [Osteomyelitis: treatment concepts from the plastic surgeon's point of view].

Authors:  R E Horch; C D Taeger; H U Steinau; U Kneser; S Schnürer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  A combined pharmacodynamic quantitative and qualitative model reveals the potent activity of daptomycin and delafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Julia Bauer; Wafi Siala; Paul M Tulkens; Françoise Van Bambeke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  MyD88-dependent signaling influences fibrosis and alternative macrophage activation during Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection.

Authors:  Mark L Hanke; Amanda Angle; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Antibacterial coating of implants in orthopaedics and trauma: a classification proposal in an evolving panorama.

Authors:  Carlo Luca Romanò; Sara Scarponi; Enrico Gallazzi; Delia Romanò; Lorenzo Drago
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  New insights in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius pathogenicity: antibiotic-resistant biofilm formation by a human wound-associated strain.

Authors:  Arianna Pompilio; Serena De Nicola; Valentina Crocetta; Simone Guarnieri; Vincenzo Savini; Edoardo Carretto; Giovanni Di Bonaventura
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 7.  Antibacterial surface treatment for orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Martin Holinka; Calin S Moucha
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Deciphering mechanisms of staphylococcal biofilm evasion of host immunity.

Authors:  Mark L Hanke; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Human plasma enhances the expression of Staphylococcal microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules promoting biofilm formation and increases antimicrobial tolerance In Vitro.

Authors:  Anthony P Cardile; Carlos J Sanchez; Meghan E Samberg; Desiree R Romano; Sharanda K Hardy; Joseph C Wenke; Clinton K Murray; Kevin S Akers
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-07-17

10.  Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA Growth and Biofilm Formation after Treatment with Antibiotics and SeNPs.

Authors:  Kristyna Cihalova; Dagmar Chudobova; Petr Michalek; Amitava Moulick; Roman Guran; Pavel Kopel; Vojtech Adam; Rene Kizek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.