Literature DB >> 23571532

A combined pharmacodynamic quantitative and qualitative model reveals the potent activity of daptomycin and delafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Julia Bauer1, Wafi Siala, Paul M Tulkens, Françoise Van Bambeke.   

Abstract

Biofilms are associated with persistence of Staphylococcus aureus infections and therapeutic failures. Our aim was to set up a pharmacodynamic model comparing antibiotic activities against biofilms and examining in parallel their effects on viability and biofilm mass. Biofilms of S. aureus ATCC 25923 (methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA]) or ATCC 33591 (methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]) were obtained by culture in 96-well plates for 6 h/24 h. Antibiotic activities were assessed after 24/48 h of exposure to concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 512 times the MIC. Biofilm mass and bacterial viability were quantified using crystal violet and the redox indicator resazurin. Biofilms stained with Live/Dead probes were observed by using confocal microscopy. Concentration-effect curves fitted sigmoidal regressions, with a 50% reduction toward both matrix and viability obtained at sub-MIC or low multiples of MICs against young biofilms for all antibiotics tested. Against mature biofilms, maximal efficacies and potencies were reduced, with none of the antibiotics being able to completely destroy the matrix. Delafloxacin and daptomycin were the most potent, reducing viability by more than 50% at clinically achievable concentrations against both strains, as well as reducing biofilm depth, as observed in confocal microscopy. Rifampin, tigecycline, and moxifloxacin were effective against mature MRSA biofilms, while oxacillin demonstrated activity against MSSA. Fusidic acid, vancomycin, and linezolid were less potent overall. Antibiotic activity depends on biofilm maturity and bacterial strain. The pharmacodynamic model developed allows ranking of antibiotics with respect to efficacy and potency at clinically achievable concentrations and highlights the potential utility of daptomycin and delafloxacin for the treatment of biofilm-related infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571532      PMCID: PMC3716136          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00181-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  60 in total

1.  Environmental regulation of biofilm development in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.

Authors:  F Fitzpatrick; H Humphreys; J P O'Gara
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Innate and induced resistance mechanisms of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  G G Anderson; G A O'Toole
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Staphylococcal biofilms.

Authors:  M Otto
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Comparative activities of daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline against catheter-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus bacteremic isolates embedded in biofilm.

Authors:  Issam Raad; Hend Hanna; Ying Jiang; Tanya Dvorak; Ruth Reitzel; Gassan Chaiban; Robert Sherertz; Ray Hachem
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Association between methicillin susceptibility and biofilm regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from device-related infections.

Authors:  Eoghan O'Neill; Clarissa Pozzi; Patrick Houston; Davida Smyth; Hilary Humphreys; D Ashley Robinson; James P O'Gara
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Activity of moxifloxacin on biofilms produced in vitro by bacterial pathogens involved in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Authors:  S Roveta; A M Schito; A Marchese; G C Schito
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  Activity of daptomycin on biofilms produced on a plastic support by Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  S Roveta; A Marchese; G C Schito
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.283

8.  Investigation of biofilm formation in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  James E Cassat; Chia Y Lee; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2007

9.  Pharmacodynamic evaluation of the intracellular activities of antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus in a model of THP-1 macrophages.

Authors:  Maritza Barcia-Macay; Cristina Seral; Marie-Paule Mingeot-Leclercq; Paul M Tulkens; Françoise Van Bambeke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  A new colorimetric microtitre model for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  K Toté; D Vanden Berghe; L Maes; P Cos
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.858

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  [Orthopaedic implant-associated infections: Update of antimicrobial therapy].

Authors:  W Zimmerli
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Bloodstream infections in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Elda Righi; Alessia Carnelutti
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.882

3.  The anti-biofilm effect of macrolides in a rat model of S. aureus foreign-body infection: Might it be of clinical relevance?

Authors:  Cristina El Haj; Oscar Murillo; Alba Ribera; Dolors Garcia-Somoza; Fe Tubau; Carmen Cabellos; Javier Cabo; Javier Ariza
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  N-terminally modified linear and branched spermine backbone dipeptidomimetics against planktonic and sessile methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Rikeshwer Prasad Dewangan; Seema Joshi; Shalini Kumari; Hemlata Gautam; Mohammed Shahar Yar; Santosh Pasha
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Spectrofluorimetric quantification of antibiotic drug concentration in bacterial cells for the characterization of translocation across bacterial membranes.

Authors:  Julia Vergalli; Estelle Dumont; Jelena Pajović; Bertrand Cinquin; Laure Maigre; Muriel Masi; Matthieu Réfrégiers; Jean-Marie Pagés
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Allicin-inspired pyridyl disulfides as antimicrobial agents for multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jordan G Sheppard; Jeremy P McAleer; Pushkar Saralkar; Werner J Geldenhuys; Timothy E Long
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 7.  Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Maria Magana; Christina Sereti; Anastasios Ioannidis; Courtney A Mitchell; Anthony R Ball; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Michael R Hamblin; Maria Hadjifrangiskou; George P Tegos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro, in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Parham Sendi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Small lipopeptides possess anti-biofilm capability comparable to daptomycin and vancomycin.

Authors:  Biswajit Mishra; Tamara Lushnikova; Guangshun Wang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.361

10.  Activity of Antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an In Vitro Model of Biofilms in the Context of Cystic Fibrosis: Influence of the Culture Medium.

Authors:  Yvan Diaz Iglesias; Françoise Van Bambeke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.