OBJECTIVES: Aboriginal people are under-represented in epidemiological research, largely due to past failures to engage and recruit Aboriginal communities, research fatigue and the use of culturally inappropriate methods. A qualitative study was undertaken in rural and urban Aboriginal communities in north-eastern and south-western Ontario to identify culturally congruent public health research methodologies. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative participatory research study using focus group discussions. METHODS: This study employed a participatory research framework to elicit methodological suggestions for conducting public health research with Aboriginal communities during focus groups with healthcare providers from six diverse Aboriginal health organizations in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: Continuing requests for participation in health research studies have led to community exhaustion. Discussions explored appropriate methods to obtain community approval and support for a study, the need for cultural sensitivity training for researchers, the value of conducting studies of interest and benefit to the community, advantages and disadvantages of qualitative and quantitative studies, the benefit of both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal ethics reviews, the importance of safeguarding trusted information, types of incentives that may enhance study participation, suggestions to improve the collection of questionnaire information and biological specimens, how to resolve contentious issues and dissemination of study results. CONCLUSION: In order to successfully engage Aboriginal people in health studies, researchers need to build rapport with communities, have a community presence, be respectful and collaborative, utilize incentives, and employ flexible and adaptive methodologies of reasonable length. Oral interviews are preferred to self-completed information. The use of more mixed methods methodologies was suggested when quantitative data collection is necessary. Communities expect presentations about research findings.
OBJECTIVES: Aboriginal people are under-represented in epidemiological research, largely due to past failures to engage and recruit Aboriginal communities, research fatigue and the use of culturally inappropriate methods. A qualitative study was undertaken in rural and urban Aboriginal communities in north-eastern and south-western Ontario to identify culturally congruent public health research methodologies. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative participatory research study using focus group discussions. METHODS: This study employed a participatory research framework to elicit methodological suggestions for conducting public health research with Aboriginal communities during focus groups with healthcare providers from six diverse Aboriginal health organizations in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: Continuing requests for participation in health research studies have led to community exhaustion. Discussions explored appropriate methods to obtain community approval and support for a study, the need for cultural sensitivity training for researchers, the value of conducting studies of interest and benefit to the community, advantages and disadvantages of qualitative and quantitative studies, the benefit of both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal ethics reviews, the importance of safeguarding trusted information, types of incentives that may enhance study participation, suggestions to improve the collection of questionnaire information and biological specimens, how to resolve contentious issues and dissemination of study results. CONCLUSION: In order to successfully engage Aboriginal people in health studies, researchers need to build rapport with communities, have a community presence, be respectful and collaborative, utilize incentives, and employ flexible and adaptive methodologies of reasonable length. Oral interviews are preferred to self-completed information. The use of more mixed methods methodologies was suggested when quantitative data collection is necessary. Communities expect presentations about research findings.
Authors: Christina Sinding; Rachel Warren; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Jonathan Sussman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Isabelle Risso-Gill; Dina Balabanova; Fadhlina Majid; Kien Keat Ng; Khalid Yusoff; Feisul Mustapha; Charlotte Kuhlbrandt; Robby Nieuwlaat; J-D Schwalm; Tara McCready; Koon K Teo; Salim Yusuf; Martin McKee Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Erin E Michalak; Steven Jones; Fiona Lobban; Guillermo Perez Algorta; Steven J Barnes; Lesley Berk; Michael Berk; Rachelle Hole; Sara Lapsley; Victoria Maxwell; Roumen Milev; John McManamy; Greg Murray; Mauricio Tohen; Samson Tse; Manuel Sanchez de Carmona; Sheri L Johnson Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2016-02-09