Literature DB >> 22093816

Pain-related avoidance versus endurance in primary care patients with subacute back pain: psychological characteristics and outcome at a 6-month follow-up.

Monika I Hasenbring1, Dirk Hallner, Bernhard Klasen, Irmgard Streitlein-Böhme, Roland Willburger, Herbert Rusche.   

Abstract

Recent research has found individual differences in back pain patients due to behavioral avoidance vs persistence. However, there is a lack of prospective studies of nonspecific low back pain patients. The avoidance-endurance model (AEM) suggests at least 3 pathways leading to chronic pain: fear-avoidance response, distress-endurance response, and eustress-endurance response. We sought to compare these 3 maladaptive subgroups with an adaptive group using a classification tool that included the following scales: the thought suppression and behavioral endurance subscale of the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire and the Beck Depression Inventory. The psychological characteristics, and pain and disability of the AEM subgroups were investigated. We report results from 177 patients with subacute nonspecific low back pain at the start of outpatient treatment and at follow-up after 6 months. At baseline, a multivariate analysis of variance found that the fear-avoidance patients scored higher in pain catastrophizing than the other groups. The distress-endurance patients displayed elevated anxiety/depression and helplessness/hopelessness accompanied with the highest scores in the classification variables thought suppression and persistence behavior. The eustress-endurance patients had the highest humor/distraction scores, pain persistence, and positive mood despite pain. All 3 maladaptive groups revealed a higher pain intensity than the adaptive patients at follow-up after 6 months; however, disability at follow-up was elevated only in the fear-avoidance and distress-endurance patients. The study provides preliminary evidence for the construct and prospective validity of AEM-based subgroups of subacute, nonspecific back pain patients. The results suggest the need for individually targeted cognitive behavioral treatments in the maladaptive groups.
Copyright © 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22093816     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  24 in total

1.  Recall Bias in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Individual Pain Response Patterns Are More Important Than Pain Itself!

Authors:  Zohra Karimi; Alisha Pilenko; Sabine Melanie Held; Monika Ilona Hasenbring
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-02

Review 2.  [Body image and low back pain].

Authors:  C G Levenig; M I Hasenbring; J Kleinert; M Kellmann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 3.  The Role of Psychosocial Processes in the Development and Maintenance of Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards; Robert H Dworkin; Mark D Sullivan; Dennis C Turk; Ajay D Wasan
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Mild Depression in Low Back Pain: the Interaction of Thought Suppression and Stress Plays a Role, Especially in Female Patients.

Authors:  Kerstin Konietzny; Omar Chehadi; Irmgard Streitlein-Böhme; Herbert Rusche; Roland Willburger; Monika Ilona Hasenbring
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2018-04

Review 5.  [Physical activity and musculoskeletal pain : A focus review within the MiSpEx research group].

Authors:  C Titze; H Gajsar; M I Hasenbring
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Assessing psychological flexibility in patients with chronic pain: the Korean adaptation of the Brief Pain Response Inventory.

Authors:  KyungHun Han; DoWan Kim; Sungkun Cho
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Understanding Pain and Depression in Back Pain: the Role of Catastrophizing, Help-/Hopelessness, and Thought Suppression as Potential Mediators.

Authors:  Janina Hülsebusch; Monika I Hasenbring; Adina C Rusu
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-06

8.  The German PASS-20 in patients with low back pain: new aspects of convergent, divergent, and criterion-related validity.

Authors:  Nina Kreddig; Adina C Rusu; Katja Burkhardt; Monika I Hasenbring
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2015-04

Review 9.  [Chronic low back pain and psychological comorbidity : A review].

Authors:  J Bletzer; S Gantz; T Voigt; E Neubauer; M Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luciola da C Menezes Costa; Christopher G Maher; Mark J Hancock; James H McAuley; Robert D Herbert; Leonardo O P Costa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.