Literature DB >> 22093685

Nature and distribution of large sequence polymorphisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Ludo A H Muller1, John H McCusker.   

Abstract

To obtain a better understanding of the genome-wide distribution and the nature of large sequence polymorphisms (LSPs) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we hybridized genomic DNA of 88 haploid or homozygous diploid S. cerevisiae strains of diverse geographic origins and source substrates onto high-density tiling arrays. On the basis of loss of hybridization, we identified 384 LSPs larger than 500 bp that were located in 188 non-overlapping regions of the genome. Validation by polymerase chain reaction-amplification and/or DNA sequencing revealed that 39 LSPs were due to deletions, whereas 74 LSPs involved sequences diverged far enough from the S288c reference genome sequence as to prevent hybridization to the microarray features. The LSP locations were biased toward the subtelomeric regions of chromosomes, where high genetic variation in genes involved in transport or fermentation is thought to facilitate rapid adaptation of S. cerevisiae to new environments. The diverged LSP sequences appear to have different allelic ancestries and were in many cases identified as Saccharomyces paradoxus introgressions.
© 2011 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22093685      PMCID: PMC3228255          DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00748.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res        ISSN: 1567-1356            Impact factor:   2.796


  29 in total

1.  Getting started with yeast.

Authors:  F Sherman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Structural variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Lars Feuk; Andrew R Carson; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  The chromosome ends of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E J Louis
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.239

4.  Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.

Authors:  Roy J Britten; Lee Rowen; John Williams; R Andrew Cameron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiple Ty-mediated chromosomal translocations lead to karyotype changes in a wine strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  N Rachidi; P Barre; B Blondin
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1999-06

6.  Repair of chromosome ends after telomere loss in Saccharomyces.

Authors:  J L Mangahas; M K Alexander; L L Sandell; V A Zakian
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Intrachromosomal movement of genetically marked Saccharomyces cerevisiae transposons by gene conversion.

Authors:  G S Roeder; M Smith; E J Lambie
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Homing of a DNA endonuclease gene by meiotic gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F S Gimble; J Thorner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The chromosome end in yeast: its mosaic nature and influence on recombinational dynamics.

Authors:  E J Louis; E S Naumova; A Lee; G Naumov; J E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genome-wide analysis of nucleotide-level variation in commonly used Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Joseph Schacherer; Douglas M Ruderfer; David Gresham; Kara Dolinski; David Botstein; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Biogeographical characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast by molecular methods.

Authors:  Rosanna Tofalo; Giorgia Perpetuini; Maria Schirone; Giuseppe Fasoli; Irene Aguzzi; Aldo Corsetti; Giovanna Suzzi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen.

Authors:  Pooja K Strope; Daniel A Skelly; Stanislav G Kozmin; Gayathri Mahadevan; Eric A Stone; Paul M Magwene; Fred S Dietrich; John H McCusker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Coevolution trumps pleiotropy: carbon assimilation traits are independent of metabolic network structure in budding yeast.

Authors:  Dana A Opulente; Christopher M Morales; Lucas B Carey; Joshua S Rest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  ZRT1 Harbors an Excess of Nonsynonymous Polymorphism and Shows Evidence of Balancing Selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Engle; Justin C Fay
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Whole Genome Analysis of 132 Clinical Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains Reveals Extensive Ploidy Variation.

Authors:  Yuan O Zhu; Gavin Sherlock; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.154

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.