Literature DB >> 12672966

Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.

Roy J Britten1, Lee Rowen, John Williams, R Andrew Cameron.   

Abstract

It was recently shown that indels are responsible for more than twice as many unmatched nucleotides as are base substitutions between samples of chimpanzee and human DNA. A larger sample has now been examined and the result is similar. The number of indels is approximately 1/12th of the number of base substitutions and the average length of the indels is 36 nt, including indels up to 10 kb. The ratio (R(u)) of unpaired nucleotides attributable to indels to those attributable to substitutions is 3.0 for this 2 million-nt chimp DNA sample compared with human. There is similar evidence of a large value of R(u) for sea urchins from the polymorphism of a sample of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus DNA (R(u) = 3-4). Other work indicates that similarly, per nucleotide affected, large differences are seen for indels in the DNA polymorphism of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana (R(u) = 51). For the insect Drosophila melanogaster a high value of R(u) (4.5) has been determined. For the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans the polymorphism data are incomplete but high values of R(u) are likely. Comparison of two strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7 shows a preponderance of indels. Because these six examples are from very distant systematic groups the implication is that in general, for alignments of closely related DNA, indels are responsible for many more unmatched nucleotides than are base substitutions. Human genetic evidence suggests that indels are a major source of gene defects, indicating that indels are a significant source of evolutionary change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12672966      PMCID: PMC153612          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0330964100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  A SNP resource for human chromosome 22: extracting dense clusters of SNPs from the genomic sequence.

Authors:  E Dawson; Y Chen; S Hunt; L J Smink; A Hunt; K Rice; S Livingston; S Bumpstead; R Bruskiewich; P Sham; R Ganske; M Adams; K Kawasaki; N Shimizu; S Minoshima; B Roe; D Bentley; I Dunham
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7 differ primarily by insertions or deletions, not single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Indira T Kudva; Peter S Evans; Nicole T Perna; Timothy J Barrett; Frederick M Ausubel; Frederick R Blattner; Stephen B Calderwood
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Rapid gene mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans using a high density polymorphism map.

Authors:  S R Wicks; R T Yeh; W R Gish; R H Waterston; R H Plasterk
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  N T Perna; G Plunkett; V Burland; B Mau; J D Glasner; D J Rose; G F Mayhew; P S Evans; J Gregor; H A Kirkpatrick; G Pósfai; J Hackett; S Klink; A Boutin; Y Shao; L Miller; E J Grotbeck; N W Davis; A Lim; E T Dimalanta; K D Potamousis; J Apodaca; T S Anantharaman; J Lin; G Yen; D C Schwartz; R A Welch; F R Blattner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Genetic mapping with SNP markers in Drosophila.

Authors:  J Berger; T Suzuki; K A Senti; J Stubbs; G Schaffner; B J Dickson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Diversification of Escherichia coli genomes: are bacteriophages the major contributors?

Authors:  M Ohnishi; K Kurokawa; T Hayashi
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.079

7.  Complete genome sequence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and genomic comparison with a laboratory strain K-12.

Authors:  T Hayashi; K Makino; M Ohnishi; K Kurokawa; K Ishii; K Yokoyama; C G Han; E Ohtsubo; K Nakayama; T Murata; M Tanaka; T Tobe; T Iida; H Takami; T Honda; C Sasakawa; N Ogasawara; T Yasunaga; S Kuhara; T Shiba; M Hattori; H Shinagawa
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2001-02-28       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Genomewide comparison of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Ingo Ebersberger; Dirk Metzler; Carsten Schwarz; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The large srh family of chemoreceptor genes in Caenorhabditis nematodes reveals processes of genome evolution involving large duplications and deletions and intron gains and losses.

Authors:  H M Robertson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 10.  Disease-causing mutations in the human genome.

Authors:  S E Antonarakis; M Krawczak; D N Cooper
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.183

View more
  75 in total

1.  Comparative use of InDel and SSR markers in deciphering the interspecific structure of cultivated citrus genetic diversity: a perspective for genetic association studies.

Authors:  Andrés García-Lor; François Luro; Luis Navarro; Patrick Ollitrault
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Insertions, deletions, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms at rare restriction enzyme sites enhance discriminatory power of polymorphic amplified typing sequences, a novel strain typing system for Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  Indira T Kudva; Robert W Griffin; Megan Murray; Manohar John; Nicole T Perna; Timothy J Barrett; Stephen B Calderwood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Indel-based evolutionary distance and mouse-human divergence.

Authors:  Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Shamil Sunyaev; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Large tandem, higher order repeats and regularly dispersed repeat units contribute substantially to divergence between human and chimpanzee Y chromosomes.

Authors:  Vladimir Paar; Matko Glunčić; Ivan Basar; Marija Rosandić; Petar Paar; Mislav Cvitković
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Positive selection on nucleotide substitutions and indels in accessory gland proteins of the Drosophila pseudoobscura subgroup.

Authors:  Sheri Dixon Schully; Michael E Hellberg
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Serial segmental duplications during primate evolution result in complex human genome architecture.

Authors:  Pawełl Stankiewicz; Christine J Shaw; Marjorie Withers; Ken Inoue; James R Lupski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Size of the protein-coding genome and rate of molecular evolution.

Authors:  Zoran A Rajic; Gradimir M Jankovic; Ana Vidovic; Natasa M Milic; Dejan Skoric; Milorad Pavlovic; Vladimir Lazarevic
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Evolutionary analysis of the well characterized endo16 promoter reveals substantial variation within functional sites.

Authors:  James P Balhoff; Gregory A Wray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Comparative genomic analysis of human and chimpanzee indicates a key role for indels in primate evolution.

Authors:  Anna Wetterbom; Marie Sevov; Lucia Cavelier; Tomas F Bergström
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-29       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  An alternative pathway for Alu retrotransposition suggests a role in DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Deepa Srikanta; Shurjo K Sen; Charles T Huang; Erin M Conlin; Ryan M Rhodes; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.