Literature DB >> 22092691

Evaluation of moldable, in situ hardening calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes.

P R Schmidlin1, F Nicholls, A Kruse, R A Zwahlen, F E Weber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Moldable in situ self-stabilizing and hardening bone graft materials facilitate handling and may be suitable for membrane-free bone regeneration methods. This study aimed to compare two moldable synthetic calcium phosphate materials in a rabbit calvarial defect model.
METHOD: In 12 New Zealand white rabbits, four evenly distributed 6 mm diameter defects were drilled in the calvarial bone. Three filler materials were randomly applied to 48 defects: an in situ hardening polylactide-coated ß-tricalcium phosphate (TCP), an in situ hardening polylactide-coated biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP), and a granular deproteinized bovine bone matrix (DBBM, positive control). One defect remained untreated and served as a negative control. Six animals were sacrificed after 4 weeks, and the remaining animals were sacrificed after 16 weeks. Biocompatibility, bone graft substitute integration and resorption, bone formation, defect bridging, and height of reconstructed hard tissue were assessed histologically and histomorphometrically.
RESULTS: All tested materials showed good biocompatibility. Semi-quantitative analysis and pair-wise comparison suggested that BCP was more efficient in centripetal bone formation when compared with TCP. After 4 weeks, significantly more bone had formed in the defects treated with either TCP or BCP materials compared with the untreated sites. BCP and DBBM did not show macroscopic signs of degradation, whereas the TCP material was partially resorbed after 16 weeks. Otherwise, no major differences were detected between the three materials.
CONCLUSION: The moldable, synthetic calcium phosphates are safe and suitable bone graft substitutes with outcomes that are comparable to the control material.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092691     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02315.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  20 in total

Review 1.  Reconsidering Osteoconduction in the Era of Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Franz E Weber
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Immediate Implant Placement in Infected Sockets: A Consecutive Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ashish Kakar; Kanupriya Kakar; Minas D Leventis; Gaurav Jain
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-15

3.  Mineralizing Coating on 3D Printed Scaffolds for the Promotion of Osseointegration.

Authors:  Abshar Hasan; Romain Bagnol; Robert Owen; Arsalan Latif; Hassan M Rostam; Sherif Elsharkawy; Felicity R A J Rose; José Carlos Rodríguez-Cabello; Amir M Ghaemmaghami; David Eglin; Alvaro Mata
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Comparative, Histological and Histomorphometric Analysis of Three Anorganic Bovine Xenogenous Bone Substitutes: Bio-Oss, Bone-Fill and Gen-Ox Anorganic.

Authors:  Rafael Manfro; Fabiano Silva Fonseca; Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Wilson Roberto Sendyk
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-02

5.  Paracrine effect of the bone morphogeneticprotein-2 at the experimental site on healing of the adjacent control site: a study in the rabbit calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Jin-Wook Lee; Hyun-Chang Lim; Eun-Ung Lee; Jin-Young Park; Jung-Seok Lee; Dong-Woon Lee; Ui-Won Jung; Seong-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Minimally Invasive Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing an In Situ Hardening β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitute: A Multicenter Case Series.

Authors:  Minas D Leventis; Peter Fairbairn; Ashish Kakar; Angelos D Leventis; Vasileios Margaritis; Walter Lückerath; Robert A Horowitz; Bappanadu H Rao; Annette Lindner; Heiner Nagursky
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-04-14

7.  Biomechanical Stability of Dental Implants in Augmented Maxillary Sites: Results of a Randomized Clinical Study with Four Different Biomaterials and PRF and a Biological View on Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Troedhan Angelo; Wainwright Marcel; Kurrek Andreas; Schlichting Izabela
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Ridge preservation using an in situ hardening biphasic calcium phosphate (β-TCP/HA) bone graft substitute-a clinical, radiological, and histological study.

Authors:  Ashish Kakar; Bappanadu H Sripathi Rao; Shashikanth Hegde; Nikhil Deshpande; Annette Lindner; Heiner Nagursky; Aditya Patney; Harsh Mahajan
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-06-22

9.  The Effect of Bisphasic Calcium Phosphate Block Bone Graft Materials with Polysaccharides on Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Hyun-Sang Yoo; Ji-Hyeon Bae; Se-Eun Kim; Eun-Bin Bae; So-Yeun Kim; Kyung-Hee Choi; Keum-Ok Moon; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Rapid bone regeneration by Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 loaded on a hydroxyapatite carrier in the rabbit calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Chung-Hoon Chung; You-Kyoung Kim; Jung-Seok Lee; Ui-Won Jung; Eun-Kyoung Pang; Seong-Ho Choi
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2015-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.