Literature DB >> 22092205

H-index is a sensitive indicator of academic activity in highly productive anaesthesiologists: results of a bibliometric analysis.

P S Pagel1, J A Hudetz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: H-index distinguishes differences in scholarly output across faculty ranks in anaesthesiologists, but whether h-index also identifies differences in other aspects of productivity is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that h-index is an indicator of not only publication record, but also grant funding and mentoring in highly productive US academic anaesthesiologists.
METHODS: We conducted an internet analysis of the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research Academy of Research Mentors in Anesthesiology (n = 43). Publications, citations, citations per publication, and h-index for each investigator were obtained using the Scopus(®) . Total grants, active grants, years of funding, and duration of longest funded grant were recorded using the US National Institutes of Health Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools(®) . Members were surveyed to identify the number of their career trainees and those who obtained independent funding.
RESULTS: The median [IRQ (Interquartile range)] h-index of members was 23 [17-32 (8-50)]. Members published 136 [100-225 (39-461)] papers with 3573 [1832-5090 (150-11,601)] citations and 21 [15-32 (4-59)] citations per publication. Members received four [3-7 (0-10)] grants and were funded for 29 [17-45 (0-115)] grant-years. Survey respondents (79%) mentored 40 [26-69 (15-191)] trainees, three [2-6 (0-20)] of which subsequently received funding. Members with h-indices greater than the median had more publications, citations, citations per publication, grants, and years of funding compared with their counterparts. H-index was associated with total citations, active grants, and the number of trainees.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to publication record, h-index sensitively indicates grant funding and mentoring in highly productive US academic anaesthesiologists. 2011 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2011 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092205     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02508.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  16 in total

1.  Bibliometric Analyses of Physical and Occupational Therapy Faculty across Canada Indicate Productivity and Impact of Rehabilitation Research.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Eunice H Fung; Mary Law
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Factors affecting scientific productivity of German oral-maxillofacial surgery training centers: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Andreas Neff; Keskanya Subbalekha; Kittipong Dhanuthai; Nattapong Sirintawat; Poramate Pitak-Arnnop
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-02-25

3.  [Publications by university Departments of Anaesthesiology from Germany, Austria and Switzerland in 2011-2015 : Scientific publications by university hospitals in D‑A-CH].

Authors:  C Miller; J Ausserer; G Putzer; P Hamm; H Herff; V Wenzel; P Paal
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Fellowships Represent a Logical Target for Cultivating Research in Academic Anesthesiology.

Authors:  Jean Daniel Eloy; Molly D Amin; Anna A Pashkova; Peter F Svider; Kevin M Mauro; Jean Anderson Eloy
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2017-07-01

5.  A Systematic Review of Gender-Based Differences in Hirsch Index Among Academic Surgeons.

Authors:  Sara P Myers; Katherine M Reitz; Charles B Wessel; Matthew D Neal; Jennifer A Corbelli; Leslie R M Hausmann; Matthew R Rosengart
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Gender Disparity in Academic Gastroenterology: Beginning of the End of the Underrepresentation of Women?

Authors:  Jason J John; Elizabeth S John; Lauren Pioppo; Arjun Gupta; Sita Chokhavatia; Amy Tilara
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Development and validation of a convenient formula evaluating the value and applicability of medical literature in clinical practice.

Authors:  Hsiao-Pei Mok; Ying Zhou; Jun-Ru Chen; Qiang Gao
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Determining the Drivers of Academic Success in Surgery: An Analysis of 3,850 Faculty.

Authors:  Nakul P Valsangkar; Teresa A Zimmers; Bradford J Kim; Casi Blanton; Mugdha M Joshi; Teresa M Bell; Attila Nakeeb; Gary L Dunnington; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Two h-index benchmarks for evaluating the publication performance of medical informatics researchers.

Authors:  Khaled El Emam; Luk Arbuckle; Elizabeth Jonker; Kevin Anderson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Bibliometric analysis of the volume and visibility of Saudi publications in leading anesthesia journals.

Authors:  Hany A Mowafi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.