OBJECTIVES: To describe the provision of medical care in assisted living (AL) as provided by physicians who are especially active in providing care to older adults and AL residents; to identify characteristics associated with physician confidence in AL staff; and to ask physicians a variety of questions about their experience providing care to AL residents and how it compares with providing care in the nursing home and home care settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: AL communities in 27 states. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-five physicians and administrators of 125 AL settings in which they had patients. MEASUREMENTS: Interviews and questionnaires containing open- and close-ended questions regarding demographics, care arrangements, attitudes, and behaviors in managing medical problems. RESULTS: Most respondents were certified in internal medicine (46%) or family medicine (47%); 32% were certified in geriatrics and 30% in medical directorship. In this select sample, 48% visited the AL setting once a year or less, and 19% visited once a week or more. Mean physician confidence in AL staff was 3.3 (somewhat confident), with greater confidence associated with smaller AL community size, nursing presence, and the physician being the medical director. Qualitative analyses identified differences between settings including lack of vital sign assessment in the home setting, concern about the ability of AL staff to assess and monitor problems, and greater administrative and regulatory requirements in AL than in the other settings. CONCLUSION: Providing medical care for AL residents presents unique challenges and opportunities for physicians. Nursing presence and physician oversight and familiarity and communicating with AL staff who are highly familiar with a given resident and can monitor care may facilitate care.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the provision of medical care in assisted living (AL) as provided by physicians who are especially active in providing care to older adults and AL residents; to identify characteristics associated with physician confidence in AL staff; and to ask physicians a variety of questions about their experience providing care to AL residents and how it compares with providing care in the nursing home and home care settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: AL communities in 27 states. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-five physicians and administrators of 125 AL settings in which they had patients. MEASUREMENTS: Interviews and questionnaires containing open- and close-ended questions regarding demographics, care arrangements, attitudes, and behaviors in managing medical problems. RESULTS: Most respondents were certified in internal medicine (46%) or family medicine (47%); 32% were certified in geriatrics and 30% in medical directorship. In this select sample, 48% visited the AL setting once a year or less, and 19% visited once a week or more. Mean physician confidence in AL staff was 3.3 (somewhat confident), with greater confidence associated with smaller AL community size, nursing presence, and the physician being the medical director. Qualitative analyses identified differences between settings including lack of vital sign assessment in the home setting, concern about the ability of AL staff to assess and monitor problems, and greater administrative and regulatory requirements in AL than in the other settings. CONCLUSION: Providing medical care for AL residents presents unique challenges and opportunities for physicians. Nursing presence and physician oversight and familiarity and communicating with AL staff who are highly familiar with a given resident and can monitor care may facilitate care.
Authors: Malaz Boustani; Sheryl Zimmerman; Christianna S Williams; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Lea Watson; Peter S Reed; Philip D Sloane Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2005-10
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Philip D Sloane; J Kevin Eckert; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Leslie A Morgan; J Richard Hebel; Jay Magaziner; Sally C Stearns; Cory K Chen Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: John Gerard Schumacher; J Kevin Eckert; Sheryl Zimmerman; Paula Carder; Arnette Wright Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Philip D Sloane; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Sheryl Zimmerman; Mary Roth; Lea Watson; Malaz Boustani; Jay Magaziner; J Richard Hebel Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2004-10-11
Authors: Philip D Sloane; Christopher H Schifeling; Anna S Beeber; Kimberly T Ward; David Reed; Lisa P Gwyther; Bobbi Matchar; Sheryl Zimmerman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Cleveland A Piggott; Sheryl Zimmerman; David Reed; Philip D Sloane Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Paula Carder; Lindsay Schwartz; Johanna Silbersack; Helena Temkin-Greener; Kali S Thomas; Kimberly Ward; Robert Jenkens; Liz Jensen; Alfred C Johnson; Jed Johnson; Tim Johnston; Loretta Kaes; Paul Katz; Juliet Holt Klinger; Cathy Lieblich; Beth Mace; Kevin O'Neil; Douglas D Pace; Kezia Scales; Robyn I Stone; Sarah Thomas; Paul J Williams; Keren Brown Williams Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Paula Carder; Sheryl Zimmerman; Christopher J Wretman; John S Preisser; Sarah Dys; Philip D Sloane Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 7.802
Authors: Christine E Kistler; Philip D Sloane; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Anna S Beeber; Christine Khandelwal; David J Weber; C Madeline Mitchell; David Reed; Latarsha Chisholm; Sheryl Zimmerman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anna S Beeber; Sheryl Zimmerman; David Reed; C Madeline Mitchell; Philip D Sloane; Brandy Harris-Wallace; Rosa Perez; John G Schumacher Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David B Hogan; Joseph E Amuah; Laurel A Strain; Walter P Wodchis; Andrea Soo; Misha Eliasziw; Andrea Gruneir; Brad Hagen; Gary Teare; Colleen J Maxwell Journal: Open Med Date: 2014-03-04