| Literature DB >> 22091358 |
Ryan Winters1, Paul Friedlander, Salem Noureldine, Ibrahim Ekaidi, Krzysztof Moroz, Emad Kandil.
Abstract
Background. Reoperative parathyroid surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism can be challenging. Numerous preoperative localization techniques have been employed to facilitate a more focused surgical exploration. This paper describes a novel, minimally invasive, and highly successful method of parathyroid localization. Methods. Patients with recurrent or persistent primary hyperparathyroidism underwent parathyroidectomy following CT scan or ultrasound-guided wire localization of the parathyroid. Accurate placement was confirmed by fine-needle aspiration with immunocytochemistry or PTH washout. The guide wire was left in situ to guide surgical excision of the gland. Curative resection was established by monitoring intact serum PTH levels after excision of the adenoma. Results. All ten patients underwent successful redo-targeted parathyroidectomy. Nine of the ten patients were discharged on the day of surgery. One patient was observed overnight due to transient postoperative hypocalcemia, which resolved with calcium supplementation. Conclusion. Placement of a localization wire via preoperative high-resolution ultrasound or CT can expedite reoperative parathyroid surgery. It allows identification of parathyroid adenoma via a minimally invasive approach, especially in cases where a sestamibi scan is inconclusive.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22091358 PMCID: PMC3195344 DOI: 10.1155/2011/487076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Minim Invasive Surg ISSN: 2090-1445
Figure 1(a) Ultrasound of parathyroid adenoma. (b) Same patient, with guide wire in place (white dot). (c) CT of parathyroid adenoma in retrosternal space. (d) Same patient, with guide wire in place (white line).
Results of ultrasound-guided FNA, PTH washout before guide wire placement and pre/postoperative calcium and PTH levels after parathyroid adenoma removal using guide wire localization.
| Patient | Preop Ca | Postop Ca | Preop PTH | Postop PTH | Fna ± for | PTH washout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1: | 10.1 | 8.9 | 103 | 4 | −ve | Unavailable |
| Patient 2: | 11.4 | 8.7 | 148 | 31 | +ve | 103 |
| Patient 3: | 11.1 | 8.8 | 158 | 80 | +ve | Unavailable |
| Patient 4: | 11.7 | 8.3 | 284 | 15.4 | +ve | 180,000 |
| Patient 5: | 11.2 | 8.5 | 212 | 8 | +ve | >2500 |
| Patient 6: | 10.4 | 9.1 | 121 | 27 | −ve | 204,727 |
| Patient 7: | 10.7 | 8.9 | 149 | 32 | −ve | 1816 |
| Patient 8: | 10.4 | 8.8 | 613 | <5 | +ve | 952 |
| Patient 9: | 8.9 | 8.6 | 95 | 29 | −ve | <60 |
| Patient 10: | 10.5 | 9.0 | 107 | 47 | +ve | 3433 |
Figure 2Guide wire in situ in operating room. Skin incision has been made to incorporate point of entry of guide wire.