Literature DB >> 22091071

2-Amino-6-nitro-1,3-benzothia-zol-3-ium hydrogen sulfate.

Hui-Fen Qian, Wei Huang.   

Abstract

In the title molecular salt, C(7)H(6)N(3)O(2)S(+)·HSO(4) (-), the 2-amino-6-nitro-1,3-benzothia-zole ring system is essentially planar [mean deviation = 0.0605 (4) Å]. In the crystal, N-H⋯O and O-H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter-actions result in a layer motif.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22091071      PMCID: PMC3213492          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811027620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related compounds, see Glidewell et al. (2001 ▶); Lynch (2002 ▶); Lynch & Duckhouse (2001 ▶); You et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H6N3O2S+·HSO4 M = 293.28 Monoclinic, a = 7.849 (6) Å b = 16.219 (12) Å c = 9.191 (7) Å β = 108.584 (10)° V = 1109.0 (14) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.51 mm−1 T = 291 K 0.16 × 0.14 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Bruker 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.923, T max = 0.942 5436 measured reflections 1958 independent reflections 1586 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.097

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.061 wR(F 2) = 0.159 S = 0.98 1958 reflections 163 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.52 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.60 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811027620/ff2020sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811027620/ff2020Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811027620/ff2020Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H6N3O2S+·HSO4F(000) = 600
Mr = 293.28Dx = 1.757 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2618 reflections
a = 7.849 (6) Åθ = 2.3–28.0°
b = 16.219 (12) ŵ = 0.51 mm1
c = 9.191 (7) ÅT = 291 K
β = 108.584 (10)°Block, colourless
V = 1109.0 (14) Å30.16 × 0.14 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4
Bruker 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer1958 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1586 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.097
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)h = −9→6
Tmin = 0.923, Tmax = 0.942k = −19→18
5436 measured reflectionsl = −8→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.159H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.98w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1126P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1958 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
163 parametersΔρmax = 0.52 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.60 e Å3
Experimental. The structure was solved by direct methods (Bruker, 2000) and successive difference Fourier syntheses.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.7190 (4)0.12918 (17)0.4541 (3)0.0400 (7)
C20.7416 (4)−0.00938 (16)0.5027 (3)0.0379 (7)
C30.7086 (5)−0.09352 (18)0.4792 (4)0.0483 (8)
H30.6294−0.11310.38740.058*
C40.7959 (5)−0.14661 (19)0.5950 (4)0.0501 (8)
H40.7790−0.20320.58150.060*
C50.9089 (4)−0.11571 (17)0.7315 (4)0.0427 (7)
C60.9441 (4)−0.03251 (17)0.7588 (3)0.0427 (7)
H61.0207−0.01320.85200.051*
C70.8588 (4)0.02045 (17)0.6393 (3)0.0387 (7)
N10.6668 (3)0.05352 (15)0.4010 (3)0.0412 (6)
H1A0.59270.04470.31070.049*
N20.6630 (4)0.19655 (15)0.3774 (3)0.0524 (8)
H2A0.58740.19410.28610.063*
H2B0.70140.24360.41780.063*
N30.9911 (4)−0.17264 (18)0.8562 (3)0.0538 (7)
O11.0531 (3)−0.14566 (16)0.9864 (3)0.0651 (7)
O20.9914 (5)−0.24573 (18)0.8252 (3)0.0885 (10)
O30.4172 (3)0.88694 (13)1.0011 (3)0.0602 (7)
H3A0.39340.93051.03570.090*
O40.6040 (3)0.96348 (13)0.8861 (2)0.0479 (6)
O50.7360 (3)0.90117 (14)1.1335 (3)0.0607 (7)
O60.6226 (3)0.81597 (13)0.9086 (3)0.0549 (7)
S10.87176 (11)0.12757 (5)0.63686 (9)0.0506 (3)
S20.60859 (9)0.89227 (4)0.98544 (8)0.0401 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0477 (16)0.0359 (15)0.0280 (16)−0.0021 (12)0.0003 (13)0.0006 (12)
C20.0509 (16)0.0330 (14)0.0274 (15)−0.0023 (12)0.0092 (13)0.0000 (11)
C30.067 (2)0.0398 (16)0.0321 (16)−0.0075 (15)0.0077 (14)−0.0101 (13)
C40.072 (2)0.0347 (15)0.0430 (19)0.0010 (15)0.0172 (16)0.0014 (14)
C50.0461 (16)0.0434 (17)0.0365 (17)0.0047 (13)0.0103 (14)0.0073 (13)
C60.0451 (16)0.0452 (16)0.0315 (16)−0.0033 (13)0.0034 (13)0.0035 (13)
C70.0449 (15)0.0351 (15)0.0312 (15)−0.0024 (12)0.0053 (12)−0.0006 (11)
N10.0530 (14)0.0383 (13)0.0239 (12)−0.0053 (11)0.0005 (10)−0.0023 (10)
N20.0697 (18)0.0341 (13)0.0363 (15)−0.0036 (12)−0.0073 (13)−0.0003 (11)
N30.0579 (16)0.0541 (17)0.0479 (19)0.0046 (13)0.0149 (14)0.0168 (14)
O10.0650 (15)0.0766 (18)0.0433 (16)−0.0019 (13)0.0025 (12)0.0191 (13)
O20.131 (3)0.0496 (15)0.073 (2)0.0216 (16)0.0161 (17)0.0176 (14)
O30.0525 (14)0.0479 (13)0.081 (2)−0.0029 (10)0.0230 (14)−0.0050 (12)
O40.0656 (14)0.0382 (11)0.0354 (12)0.0087 (10)0.0099 (10)0.0037 (9)
O50.0633 (15)0.0678 (16)0.0346 (13)−0.0024 (11)−0.0077 (11)−0.0017 (11)
O60.0696 (15)0.0379 (12)0.0450 (14)0.0118 (10)0.0013 (11)−0.0044 (10)
S10.0641 (6)0.0364 (5)0.0329 (5)−0.0078 (3)−0.0104 (4)−0.0014 (3)
S20.0452 (5)0.0362 (5)0.0297 (5)0.0029 (3)−0.0010 (4)−0.0023 (3)
C1—N21.299 (4)C6—H60.9300
C1—N11.336 (3)C7—S11.741 (3)
C1—S11.725 (3)N1—H1A0.8600
C2—N11.382 (3)N2—H2A0.8600
C2—C71.386 (4)N2—H2B0.8600
C2—C31.393 (4)N3—O11.220 (4)
C3—C41.370 (4)N3—O21.220 (4)
C3—H30.9300O3—S21.557 (3)
C4—C51.380 (5)O3—H3A0.8200
C4—H40.9300O4—S21.466 (2)
C5—C61.384 (4)O5—S21.416 (2)
C5—N31.453 (4)O6—S21.446 (2)
C6—C71.387 (4)
N2—C1—N1124.2 (3)C2—C7—S1111.2 (2)
N2—C1—S1123.5 (2)C6—C7—S1127.8 (2)
N1—C1—S1112.3 (2)C1—N1—C2114.6 (2)
N1—C2—C7111.8 (2)C1—N1—H1A122.7
N1—C2—C3126.9 (3)C2—N1—H1A122.7
C7—C2—C3121.3 (3)C1—N2—H2A120.0
C4—C3—C2118.2 (3)C1—N2—H2B120.0
C4—C3—H3120.9H2A—N2—H2B120.0
C2—C3—H3120.9O1—N3—O2123.3 (3)
C3—C4—C5119.7 (3)O1—N3—C5118.9 (3)
C3—C4—H4120.2O2—N3—C5117.8 (3)
C5—C4—H4120.2S2—O3—H3A109.5
C4—C5—C6123.5 (3)C1—S1—C790.14 (13)
C4—C5—N3118.8 (3)O5—S2—O6114.58 (14)
C6—C5—N3117.6 (3)O5—S2—O4112.84 (14)
C5—C6—C7116.2 (3)O6—S2—O4111.16 (15)
C5—C6—H6121.9O5—S2—O3108.89 (16)
C7—C6—H6121.9O6—S2—O3102.90 (14)
C2—C7—C6121.0 (3)O4—S2—O3105.57 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O4i0.861.972.825 (4)171
N2—H2A···O6i0.862.022.867 (4)170
N2—H2B···O6ii0.862.102.888 (4)151
O3—H3A···O4iii0.821.862.664 (4)166
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O4i0.861.972.825 (4)171
N2—H2A⋯O6i0.862.022.867 (4)170
N2—H2B⋯O6ii0.862.102.888 (4)151
O3—H3A⋯O4iii0.821.862.664 (4)166

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  trans-Bis(2-amino-6-nitro-1,3-benzothiazole-N)dichloroplatinum(II) tetrakis(N,N'-dimethylformamide) solvate and tetrakis(2-amino-5-methyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-N4)platinum(II) hexachloroplatinate(IV) bis(N,N'-dimethylformamide) solvate.

Authors:  D E Lynch; H L Duckhouse
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  Hydrogen bonding in nitroaniline analogues: a three-dimensional framework in 2-amino-6-nitro-1,3-benzothiazole.

Authors:  C Glidewell; J N Low; S A McWilliam; J M Skakle; J L Wardell
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2001-10-12       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  2-Amino-benzimidazolium hydrogen sulfate.

Authors:  Wei You; Ying Fan; Hui-Fen Qian; Cheng Yao; Wei Huang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-12-13
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Crystal structures of 2-amino-4,4,7,7-tetra-methyl-4,5,6,7-tetra-hydro-1,3-benzo-thia-zol-3-ium benzoate and 2-amino-4,4,7,7-tetra-methyl-4,5,6,7-tetra-hydro-1,3-benzo-thia-zol-3-ium picrate.

Authors:  Belakavadi K Sagar; Marisiddaiah Girisha; Hemmige S Yathirajan; Ravindranath S Rathore; Christopher Glidewell
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2017-08-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.