Literature DB >> 22090371

[Medical and Economic Aspects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy].

T Knoll1, H-M Fritsche, J Rassweiler.   

Abstract

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the method of choice for most renal and ureteral calculi. However, endoscopic procedures such as ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy are being more and more performed as primary treatment alternatives in clinical routine. This development may result from the sometimes unsatisfying results of ESWL. While this is often explained by a lower efficacy of last-generation machines, an often unrecognized explanation is the impact of a less well trained urologist. To achieve best results it is mandatory that fundamental knowledge about shock wave physics and disintegration mechanisms are available. In Germany, the reimbursement system between outpatient and inpatient departments is totally separate. This leads to difficulties in clinical practice. We believe that patients at risk for complications, such as ureteral stones, urinary tract infections or high age, benefit from inpatient treatment, while uncomplicated renal stones can safely be treated on an outpatient basis. Regular application and training of ESWL will aid an optimization of its results and acceptance. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart ˙ New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22090371     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1283805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aktuelle Urol        ISSN: 0001-7868            Impact factor:   0.658


  7 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

2.  Managing Small Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Study on Follow-Up, Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Conservative Management vs. Early Surgery.

Authors:  Aristeidis Alevizopoulos; Dimitrios Zosimas; Lamprini Piha; Milad Hanna; Konstantinos Charitopoulos
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 3.  Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Kymora B Scotland; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy today.

Authors:  Geert G Tailly
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07

6.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: An opinion on its future.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Marie-Claire Rassweiler; Thomas Frede; Peter Alken
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-01

7.  Surgical management of urolithiasis - a systematic analysis of available guidelines.

Authors:  Valentin Zumstein; Patrick Betschart; Dominik Abt; Hans-Peter Schmid; Cedric Michael Panje; Paul Martin Putora
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.