Literature DB >> 22090203

Does prey size matter? Novel observations of feeding in the leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) allow a test of predator-prey size relationships.

Sabrina Fossette1, Adrian C Gleiss, James P Casey, Andrew R Lewis, Graeme C Hays.   

Abstract

Optimal foraging models predict that large predators should concentrate on large prey in order to maximize their net gain of energy intake. Here, we show that the largest species of sea turtle, Dermochelys coriacea, does not strictly adhere to this general pattern. Field observations combined with a theoretical model suggest that a 300 kg leatherback turtle would meet its energetic requirements by feeding for 3-4 h a day on 4 g jellyfish, but only if prey were aggregated in high-density patches. Therefore, prey abundance rather than prey size may, in some cases, be the overriding parameter for foraging leatherbacks. This is a classic example where the presence of small prey in the diet of a large marine predator may reflect profitable foraging decisions if the relatively low energy intake per small individual prey is offset by high encounter rates and minimal capture and handling costs. This study provides, to our knowledge, the first quantitative estimates of intake rate for this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22090203      PMCID: PMC3367729          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  6 in total

1.  Energetic constraints on the diet of terrestrial carnivores.

Authors:  C Carbone; G M Mace; S C Roberts; D W Macdonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Diel foraging behavior of gravid leatherback sea turtles in deep waters of the Caribbean Sea.

Authors:  James Casey; Jeanne Garner; Steve Garner; Amanda Southwood Williard
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Exercise warms adult leatherback turtles.

Authors:  Brian L Bostrom; David R Jones
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 2.320

4.  Behavioral inference of diving metabolic rate in free-ranging leatherback turtles.

Authors:  Corey J A Bradshaw; Clive R McMahon; Graeme C Hays
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.247

5.  Predator size, prey size, and dietary niche breadth relationships in marine predators.

Authors:  Gabriel C Costa
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Mechanics, hydrodynamics and energetics of blue whale lunge feeding: efficiency dependence on krill density.

Authors:  J A Goldbogen; J Calambokidis; E Oleson; J Potvin; N D Pyenson; G Schorr; R E Shadwick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  A hybrid behavioural rule of adaptation and drift explains the emergent architecture of antagonistic networks.

Authors:  S Nuwagaba; F Zhang; C Hui
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Stable isotope tracking of endangered sea turtles: validation with satellite telemetry and δ15N analysis of amino acids.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Seminoff; Scott R Benson; Karen E Arthur; Tomoharu Eguchi; Peter H Dutton; Ricardo F Tapilatu; Brian N Popp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Sizing ocean giants: patterns of intraspecific size variation in marine megafauna.

Authors:  Craig R McClain; Meghan A Balk; Mark C Benfield; Trevor A Branch; Catherine Chen; James Cosgrove; Alistair D M Dove; Leo Gaskins; Rebecca R Helm; Frederick G Hochberg; Frank B Lee; Andrea Marshall; Steven E McMurray; Caroline Schanche; Shane N Stone; Andrew D Thaler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Low turbidity in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) reduces feeding behavior and increases stress-related physiological parameters in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) during grow-out.

Authors:  Stephan S W Ende; Ekaterina Larceva; Mirko Bögner; Vincent Lugert; Matthew James Slater; Joachim Henjes
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-09

5.  Resource requirements of the Pacific leatherback turtle population.

Authors:  T Todd Jones; Brian L Bostrom; Mervin D Hastings; Kyle S Van Houtan; Daniel Pauly; David R Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) use vision to forage on gelatinous prey in mid-water.

Authors:  Tomoko Narazaki; Katsufumi Sato; Kyler J Abernathy; Greg J Marshall; Nobuyuki Miyazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Leatherback turtle movements, dive behavior, and habitat characteristics in ecoregions of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Kara L Dodge; Benjamin Galuardi; Timothy J Miller; Molly E Lutcavage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Numerical and functional responses of forest bats to a major insect pest in pine plantations.

Authors:  Yohan Charbonnier; Luc Barbaro; Amandine Theillout; Hervé Jactel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Discrete, high-latitude foraging areas are important to energy budgets and population dynamics of migratory leatherback turtles.

Authors:  Bryan P Wallace; Michael Zolkewitz; Michael C James
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.