INTRODUCTION: There has been recent widespread enthusiasm in epidermal growth factor (EGFR) as a molecularly active target in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, there is limited data on the extent of EGFR expression in EAC. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluated EGFR, pErk1/2, and total Erk1/2 expression in malignant and benign specimens. METHODS: Baseline expression of EGFR in the human normal squamous, Barrett's, and EAC cell lines were determined as well as after bile acid treatment and curcumin pretreatment. In addition, EGFR expression was also evaluated in 60 matched normal and malignant EAC resected specimens. RESULTS: The in vitro studies in the Het-1a, BarT, and OE19 cell lines failed to show any measurable expression of EGFR via Western blot technique. The marker serving as the positive control for the study, MnSOD, showed expression in each cell line for all three treatment regimens at approximately 24 kDa EGFR, showing moderate staining in the malignant tumor specimens and low staining in the benign tissue specimens. pErk1/2 showed low staining in the malignant tumor specimens and no staining in the benign tissue specimens. Total Erk1/2 showed high staining in both the malignant tumor specimens and benign tissue specimens. The differences in the mean staining scores for the malignant versus benign tissue specimens for pErk1/2 and total Erk1/2 are not statistically significant (p = 0.0726 and p = 0.7054, respectively). CONCLUSION: Thus, in conclusion, EGFR expression has been confirmed to be limited to non-existent in EAC and thus its use as a clinically active target is limited at best. Prior to the use of these expensive anti-EGFR therapies, confirmation of overexpression should be verified.
INTRODUCTION: There has been recent widespread enthusiasm in epidermal growth factor (EGFR) as a molecularly active target in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, there is limited data on the extent of EGFR expression in EAC. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluated EGFR, pErk1/2, and total Erk1/2 expression in malignant and benign specimens. METHODS: Baseline expression of EGFR in the human normal squamous, Barrett's, and EAC cell lines were determined as well as after bile acid treatment and curcumin pretreatment. In addition, EGFR expression was also evaluated in 60 matched normal and malignant EAC resected specimens. RESULTS: The in vitro studies in the Het-1a, BarT, and OE19 cell lines failed to show any measurable expression of EGFR via Western blot technique. The marker serving as the positive control for the study, MnSOD, showed expression in each cell line for all three treatment regimens at approximately 24 kDa EGFR, showing moderate staining in the malignant tumor specimens and low staining in the benign tissue specimens. pErk1/2 showed low staining in the malignant tumor specimens and no staining in the benign tissue specimens. Total Erk1/2 showed high staining in both the malignant tumor specimens and benign tissue specimens. The differences in the mean staining scores for the malignant versus benign tissue specimens for pErk1/2 and total Erk1/2 are not statistically significant (p = 0.0726 and p = 0.7054, respectively). CONCLUSION: Thus, in conclusion, EGFR expression has been confirmed to be limited to non-existent in EAC and thus its use as a clinically active target is limited at best. Prior to the use of these expensive anti-EGFR therapies, confirmation of overexpression should be verified.
Authors: Wibisono Hartojo; Amy L Silvers; Dafydd G Thomas; Christopher W Seder; Lin Lin; Hyma Rao; Zhuwen Wang; Joel K Greenson; Thomas J Giordano; Mark B Orringer; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Mahaveer S Bhojani; David G Beer; Andrew C Chang Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Munenori Takaoka; Hideki Harada; Claudia D Andl; Kenji Oyama; Yoshio Naomoto; Kelly L Dempsey; Andres J Klein-Szanto; Wafik S El-Deiry; Adda Grimberg; Hiroshi Nakagawa Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Suzanne C Schiffman; Yan Li; Deyi Xiao; Xuanshe Li; Harini S Aiyer; Robert C G Martin Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2010-05-21 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Agnieszka M Rygiel; Francesca Milano; Fibo J Ten Kate; Annet Schaap; Kenneth K Wang; Mackel P Peppelenbosch; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Kausillia K Krishnadath Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Charles T Miller; Justin R Moy; Lin Lin; Matthew Schipper; Daniel Normolle; Dean E Brenner; Mark D Iannettoni; Mark B Orringer; David G Beer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael B Tomblyn; Bryan H Goldman; Charles R Thomas; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Vivek Mehta; Thaddeus Beeker; Philip J Gold; James L Abbruzzese; Charles D Blanke Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 15.609