PURPOSE: In pediatric alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, the PAX3-FOXO1 and PAX7-FOXO1 gene fusions are prognostic indicators, while little is known concerning this disease in older patients. To determine whether PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion gene status correlates with outcome in adolescent, young adult, and adult rhabdomyosarcoma patients, the histological, immunohistochemical, and clinical characteristics of 105 patients followed at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1957 to 2001 were evaluated. METHODS: The samples were assembled into a tissue microarray, and fusion gene status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization using PAX3, PAX7, and FOXO1 loci-specific probes. The disease characteristics and specific gene fusion were correlated with patient outcomes using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of the samples exhibited a PAX3-FOXO1 fusion, 15% the PAX7-FOXO1 fusion, and 33% were negative for a rearrangement of these loci. The presence of PAX3/7-FOXO1 translocation was significantly associated with a higher frequency of metastatic disease. Although a statistically significant correlation between the PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion gene status and overall survival was not identified, there was a trend toward better outcomes for patients with fusion-negative RMS. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, identification of a FOXO1 fusion appears to be an interesting tool for predicting outcomes in older rhabdomyosarcoma patients and is worth further investigations in this rare subgroup of RMS population.
PURPOSE: In pediatric alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, the PAX3-FOXO1 and PAX7-FOXO1 gene fusions are prognostic indicators, while little is known concerning this disease in older patients. To determine whether PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion gene status correlates with outcome in adolescent, young adult, and adult rhabdomyosarcomapatients, the histological, immunohistochemical, and clinical characteristics of 105 patients followed at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1957 to 2001 were evaluated. METHODS: The samples were assembled into a tissue microarray, and fusion gene status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization using PAX3, PAX7, and FOXO1 loci-specific probes. The disease characteristics and specific gene fusion were correlated with patient outcomes using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of the samples exhibited a PAX3-FOXO1 fusion, 15% the PAX7-FOXO1 fusion, and 33% were negative for a rearrangement of these loci. The presence of PAX3/7-FOXO1 translocation was significantly associated with a higher frequency of metastatic disease. Although a statistically significant correlation between the PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion gene status and overall survival was not identified, there was a trend toward better outcomes for patients with fusion-negative RMS. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, identification of a FOXO1 fusion appears to be an interesting tool for predicting outcomes in older rhabdomyosarcomapatients and is worth further investigations in this rare subgroup of RMS population.
Authors: Bin Chang; Li Juan Pang; Yan Qi; Chun Xia Liu; Ying Cao; Hong An Li; Wen Hao Hu; Jin Fang Jiang; Wen Jie Zhang; Feng Li Journal: Int J Surg Pathol Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 1.271
Authors: J Carlijn Van Gaal; Eveline S J M De Bont; Suzanne E J Kaal; Yvonne Versleijen-Jonkers; Winette T A van der Graaf Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Brian P Rubin; Koichi Nishijo; Hung-I Harry Chen; Xiaolan Yi; David P Schuetze; Ranadip Pal; Suresh I Prajapati; Jinu Abraham; Benjamin R Arenkiel; Qing-Rong Chen; Sean Davis; Amanda T McCleish; Mario R Capecchi; Joel E Michalek; Lee Ann Zarzabal; Javed Khan; Zhongxin Yu; David M Parham; Frederic G Barr; Paul S Meltzer; Yidong Chen; Charles Keller Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: R Beverly Raney; James R Anderson; Kenneth L B Brown; Winston W Huh; Harold M Maurer; William H Meyer; David M Parham; David A Rodeberg; Suzanne L Wolden; Sarah S Donaldson Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Raffaella A Morotti; Kathleen K Nicol; David M Parham; Lisa A Teot; Julie Moore; John Hayes; William Meyer; Stephen J Qualman Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: H M Maurer; E A Gehan; M Beltangady; W Crist; P S Dickman; S S Donaldson; C Fryer; D Hammond; D M Hays; J Herrmann Journal: Cancer Date: 1993-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H Scrable; D Witte; H Shimada; T Seemayer; W W Sheng; S Soukup; A Koufos; P Houghton; B Lampkin; W Cavenee Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Wenyue Sun; Bishwanath Chatterjee; Jack F Shern; Rajesh Patidar; Young Song; Yonghong Wang; Robert L Walker; Bruce R Pawel; Corinne M Linardic; Peter Houghton; Stephen M Hewitt; Daniel C Edelman; Javed Khan; Paul S Meltzer; Frederic G Barr Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Stephen X Skapek; James Anderson; Frederic G Barr; Julia A Bridge; Julie M Gastier-Foster; David M Parham; Erin R Rudzinski; Timothy Triche; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Wenyue Sun; Bishwanath Chatterjee; Yonghong Wang; Holly S Stevenson; Daniel C Edelman; Paul S Meltzer; Frederic G Barr Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Mark A Kashtan; Thejus T Jayakrishnan; Rahul Rajeev; John C Charlson; Fabian Johnston; T Clark Gamblin; Kiran K Turaga Journal: Int J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sarah N Dumont; Dejka M Araujo; Mark F Munsell; Jason A Salganick; Amaury G Dumont; Kevin A Raymond; Claude Linassier; Shreyaskumar Patel; Robert S Benjamin; Jonathan C Trent Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 4.452