Literature DB >> 22089874

The role of predators in maintaining the geographic organization of aposematic signals.

Mathieu Chouteau1, Bernard Angers.   

Abstract

Selective predation of aposematic signals is expected to promote phenotypic uniformity. But while these signals may be uniform within a population, numerous species display impressive variations in warning signals among adjacent populations. Predators from different localities who learn to avoid distinct signals while performing intense selection on others are thus expected to maintain such a geographic organization. We tested this assumption by placing clay frog models, representing distinct color morphs of the Peruvian poison dart frog Ranitomeya imitator and a nonconspicuous frog, reciprocally between adjacent localities. In each locality, avian predators were able to discriminate between warning signals; the adjacent exotic morph experienced up to four times more attacks than the local one and two times more than the nonconspicuous phenotype. Moreover, predation attempts on the exotic morph quickly decreased to almost nil, suggesting rapid learning. This experiment offers direct evidence for the existence of different predator communities performing localized homogenizing selection on distinct aposematic signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22089874     DOI: 10.1086/662667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  22 in total

1.  How do predators generalize warning signals in simple and complex prey communities? Insights from a videogame.

Authors:  Mónica Arias; John W Davey; Simon Martin; Chris Jiggins; Nicola Nadeau; Mathieu Joron; Violaine Llaurens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Maintaining mimicry diversity: optimal warning colour patterns differ among microhabitats in Amazonian clearwing butterflies.

Authors:  Keith R Willmott; Julia C Robinson Willmott; Marianne Elias; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Stabilizing selection on individual pattern elements of aposematic signals.

Authors:  Anne E Winters; Naomi F Green; Nerida G Wilson; Martin J How; Mary J Garson; N Justin Marshall; Karen L Cheney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Unsupervised machine learning reveals mimicry complexes in bumblebees occur along a perceptual continuum.

Authors:  Briana D Ezray; Drew C Wham; Carrie E Hill; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  No link between nymph and adult coloration in shield bugs: weak selection by predators.

Authors:  Iliana Medina; Regina Vega-Trejo; Thomas Wallenius; Damien Esquerré; Constanza León; Daniela M Perez; Megan L Head
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Warning signals are under positive frequency-dependent selection in nature.

Authors:  Mathieu Chouteau; Mónica Arias; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Wright's shifting balance theory and the diversification of aposematic signals.

Authors:  Mathieu Chouteau; Bernard Angers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An Analysis of Predator Selection to Affect Aposematic Coloration in a Poison Frog Species.

Authors:  Corinna E Dreher; Molly E Cummings; Heike Pröhl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Phenotypic and Genetic Divergence among Poison Frog Populations in a Mimetic Radiation.

Authors:  Evan Twomey; Justin Yeager; Jason Lee Brown; Victor Morales; Molly Cummings; Kyle Summers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Body size but not warning signal luminance influences predation risk in recently metamorphosed poison frogs.

Authors:  Eric E Flores; Martin Stevens; Allen J Moore; Hannah M Rowland; Jonathan D Blount
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.