Literature DB >> 22089720

Association of coronary CT angiography or stress testing with subsequent utilization and spending among Medicare beneficiaries.

Jacqueline Baras Shreibati1, Laurence C Baker, Mark A Hlatky.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a new noninvasive diagnostic test for coronary artery disease (CAD), but its association with subsequent clinical management has not been established.
OBJECTIVE: To compare utilization and spending associated with functional (stress testing) and anatomical (CCTA) noninvasive cardiac testing in a Medicare population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective, observational cohort study using claims data from a 20% random sample of 2005-2008 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 66 years or older with no claims for CAD in the preceding year, who received nonemergent, noninvasive testing for CAD (n = 282,830). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiac catheterization, coronary revascularization, acute myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and total and CAD-related Medicare spending over 180 days of follow-up.
RESULTS: Compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), CCTA was associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent cardiac catheterization (22.9% vs 12.1%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.19 [95% CI, 2.08 to 2.32]; P < .001), percutaneous coronary intervention (7.8% vs 3.4%; AOR, 2.49 [2.28 to 2.72]; P < .001), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (3.7% vs 1.3%; AOR, 3.00 [2.63 to 3.41]; P < .001). CCTA was also associated with higher total health care spending ($4200 [$3193 to $5267]; P < .001), which was almost entirely attributable to payments for any claims for CAD ($4007 [$3256 to $4835]; P < .001). Compared with MPS, there was lower associated spending with stress echocardiography (-$4981 [-$4991 to -$4969]; P < .001) and exercise electrocardiography (-$7449 [-$7452 to -$7444]; P < .001). At 180 days, CCTA was associated with a similar likelihood of all-cause mortality (1.05% vs 1.28%; AOR, 1.11 [0.88 to 1.38]; P = .32) and a slightly lower likelihood of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (0.19% vs 0.43%; AOR, 0.60 [0.37 to 0.98]; P = .04).
CONCLUSION: Medicare beneficiaries who underwent CCTA in a nonacute setting were more likely to undergo subsequent invasive cardiac procedures and have higher CAD-related spending than patients who underwent stress testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22089720     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  53 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: current and evolving applications.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Coronary CT angiography after stress testing: an efficient use of resources? Implications of the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium (ACIC) results.

Authors:  Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Gilbert L Raff; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Long-term prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary computed tomography angiography: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valeria Cantoni; Roberta Green; Wanda Acampa; Mario Petretta; Domenico Bonaduce; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Natural Language Processing Technologies in Radiology Research and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Tianrun Cai; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Sheng Yu; Tatiana Kelil; Beth Ripley; Kanako K Kumamaru; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Cost and resource utilization associated with use of computed tomography to evaluate chest pain in the emergency department: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Alexander Goehler; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Fabian Bamberg; Christopher L Schlett; Quynh A Truong; John Nichols; Khurram Nasir; Ian S Rogers; Scott G Gazelle; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-10

6.  Projected morbidity and mortality from missed diagnoses of coronary artery disease in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Keith S Goldfeld; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Does FFRCT have proven utility as a gatekeeper prior to invasive angiography?

Authors:  Edward A Hulten
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Influence of scan technique on intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography using 128-slice dual source CT: multi-beat versus one-beat scan.

Authors:  Hae Jin Kim; Sung Mok Kim; Jin-Ho Choi; Yeon Hyeon Choe
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Use of cardiac CT and calcium scoring for detecting coronary plaque: implications on prognosis and patient management.

Authors:  S Divakaran; M K Cheezum; E A Hulten; M S Bittencourt; M G Silverman; K Nasir; R Blankstein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Impact of choice of imaging modality accompanying outpatient exercise stress testing on outcomes and resource use after revascularization for acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jerome J Federspiel; Bimal R Shah; Leslee J Shaw; Frederick A Masoudi; Patricia P Chang; Sally C Stearns; Daniel W Mudrick; Patricia A Cowper; Cynthia L Green; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.