Literature DB >> 22089519

Don't shoot the messnger: memory for misspellings in context.

Michael J Tat1, Tamiko Azuma.   

Abstract

Misspellings in sentences are usually easy to understand by readers due to top-down influences. Although top-down processing allows for fluent reading of misspelled items, the nature of their representations in memory is not known. If representations of misspellings are distinct from representations of correctly spelled words, their influence should be seen in later recognition decisions. In this set of experiments, participants read words and misspellings embedded in sentences and were later given a recognition test. The sentences contained semantically biased or neutral contexts. In Experiment 1, misspellings were created by removing a single letter (e.g., drveway). In Experiment 2, the recognition items probes were presented in uppercase letters (e.g., DRVEWAY) to reduce the visual similarity between study and test items. In Experiment 3, the misspellings were created by substituting visually similar letters (e.g., driweway). In contrast to the previous experiments, in Experiment 4, participants were explicitly told about the memory test to see how response strategies affect performance. Overall, the results indicate that people retain surface feature information about misspellings which seem to inform their memory judgments, and that the processing of this information cannot be strategically controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22089519     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-011-9188-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  26 in total

1.  Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: the role of contextual fan.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Dimitrios K Donavos; Michael A Erickson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

2.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; L J Evett; P T Quinlan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Long-term priming of neighbours biases the word recognition process: evidence from a lexical decision task.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Jeroen G W Raaijmakers
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2006-12

4.  Different perceptual codes support priming for words and pseudowords: was Morton right all along?

Authors:  J S Bowers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin.

Authors:  L B Feldman; J Moskovljević
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Modality differences in recognition memory for words and their attributes.

Authors:  K Kirsner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-04

7.  Auditory illusions and confusions.

Authors:  R M Warren; R P Warren
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 2.142

8.  Does implicit memory extend to legal and illegal nonwords?

Authors:  J S Bowers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; S D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson; P Warren
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.