Literature DB >> 22089397

The association of patient characteristics and spinal curve parameters with Lenke classification types.

Paul D Sponseller1, John M Flynn, Peter O Newton, Michelle C Marks, Tracey P Bastrom, Maty Petcharaporn, Mark J McElroy, Baron S Lonner, Randal R Betz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of patient characteristics and spinal curve parameters with Lenke curve types. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Lenke curve classification may be used for surgical planning and clinical research.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1912 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent initial surgery at 21 years of age or younger; collected data on patient's age, patient's sex, primary curve magnitude (<50°, 50°-75°, and .75°), and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes questionnaire (SRS-22) score; and compared that data by Lenke curve type. Analysis of variance and χ tests were used as appropriate (significance level, P ≤ 0.005). RESULTS.: Lenke types vary by sex: male patients had more major thoracic (types 1-4) than major thoracolumbar/lumbar (types 5 and 6) curves, fewer lumbar C-modifiers (32% vs. 44%), and less apical lumbar translation (1.1 vs. 1.7 cm). Lenke types vary by frequency: the most common type was 1 (50%); the least common, 4 (4%). Lenke types vary by magnitude: type 4 had the greatest percentage of large curves (52% of curves .75°), most smaller curves were types 1 and 5, and type 4 had the largest mean magnitude (78° ± 17°). Lenke types vary by patient age: type 5 curves occurred in the oldest patients (average age at surgery: 15.4 ± 2.2 vs. 14.3 ± 14.6 years for all others) despite having the lowest mean magnitude (P = 0.001); curve size was negatively correlated with age at surgery (r = -0.16, P = 0.001). Lenke types vary by patient self-image: patients with type 4 curves had lower preoperative SRS outcome scores for self-image than did patients with type 1 curves (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Lenke types vary by sex, frequency magnitude, patient age, and patient self-image, which should be considered in designing studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22089397     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824054a5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

Review 1.  Scoliosis and Prognosis-a systematic review regarding patient-specific and radiological predictive factors for curve progression.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; Stavros Oikonomidis; Arne Harland; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad; Jan Bredow; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Higher pedicle screw density does not improve curve correction in Lenke 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy J Skalak; Joel Gagnier; Michelle S Caird; Frances A Farley; Ying Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS.

Authors:  Ximing Xu; Fei Wang; Xiaoyi Zhou; Yajun Cheng; Xianzhao Wei; Yushu Bai; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.