Literature DB >> 22088326

Where do locking screws purchase in the humeral head?

Stefano Brianza1, Götz Röderer, Damiano Schiuma, Ronald Schwyn, Alexander Scola, Florian Gebhard, Andrea E Tami.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: One of the limiting factors in finding the best osteosynthesis approach in proximal humerus fractures is the current lack of information on the properties of the cancellous bone regions engaged by the implants fixing the epiphysis. The aim of this study is to assess the densitometric and mechanical characteristics of these regions when using a proximal humerus locking plate (PHLP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen PHLPs were mounted on cadaveric humeri using only their three most distal screws. Subsequently, the plates were removed and the bones were scanned using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined in the intact proximal epiphysis and in the exact locations where the six proximal screws would have been positioned concluding the instrumentation. Each plate was then repositioned on its bone and a minimally destructive local torque measurement was performed in the same six locations. A statistical analysis was performed to detect significant differences in the investigated parameters between screw positions, and to test the ability of local torque values to discriminate the bone mineral density of the entire humeral head (BMD(TOT)).
RESULTS: Novel data about the cancellous bone engaged by the screws of a PHLP are provided. Different epiphyseal locations showed statistically significant different properties. A local torque measurement was a good predictor of the BMD(TOT).
CONCLUSION: Position and direction of the epiphyseal screws on a locking implant are determinant to engage bone regions with significantly better bone quality. A breakaway torque measurement in a given screw position can distinguish between humeral heads with different densitometric properties.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22088326     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

1.  Position of polyaxial versus monoaxial screws in locked plating for proximal humeral fractures: analysis of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ben Ockert; Vera Pedersen; Lucas Geyer; Stefan Wirth; Wolf Mutschler; Stefan Grote
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-20

2.  Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A Simple Radiographic Tool to Assess Local Bone Quality in Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Nicola Kaestle; Emanuel Benninger; Jürgen Fornaro; Johannes Erhardt; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Bernhard Jost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Augmentation technique on the proximal humerus].

Authors:  A Scola; F Gebhard; G Röderer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Does cement augmentation of the screws in angular stable plating for proximal humerus fractures influence the radiological outcome: a retrospective assessment.

Authors:  Dominik Knierzinger; Ulrich Crepaz-Eger; Clemens Hengg; Franz Kralinger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Is loss of fixation following locked plating of proximal humeral fractures related to the number of screws and their positions in the humeral head?

Authors:  Mohammad Maddah; Wolf C Prall; Lucas Geyer; Stefan Wirth; Wolf Mutschler; Ben Ockert
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-06-24

6.  Computational anatomy of the proximal humerus: An ex vivo high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography study.

Authors:  Lukas Kamer; Hansrudi Noser; Albrecht Werner Popp; Mark Lenz; Michael Blauth
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.