Literature DB >> 22086143

Relationship between PSA kinetics and [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT detection rates of recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after total prostatectomy.

Vera Graute1, Nathalie Jansen, Christopher Ubleis, Michael Seitz, Markus Hartenbach, Michael Karl Scherr, Sven Thieme, Paul Cumming, Katharina Klanke, Reinhold Tiling, Peter Bartenstein, Marcus Hacker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to identify prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold levels, as well as PSA velocity, progression rate and doubling time in relation to the detectability and localization of recurrent lesions with [(18)F]fluorocholine (FC) PET/CT in patients after radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: The study group comprised 82 consecutive patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy. PSA levels measured at the time of imaging were correlated with the FC PET/CT detection rates in the entire group with PSA velocity (in 48 patients), with PSA doubling time (in 47 patients) and with PSA progression (in 29 patients).
RESULTS: FC PET/CT detected recurrent lesions in 51 of the 82 patients (62%). The median PSA value was significantly higher in PET-positive than in PET-negative patients (4.3 ng/ml vs. 1.0 ng/ml; p < 0.01). The optimal PSA threshold from ROC analysis for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer lesions was 1.74 ng/ml (AUC 0.818, 82% sensitivity, 74% specificity). Significant differences between PET-positive and PET-negative patients were found for median PSA velocity (6.4 vs. 1.1 ng/ml per year; p < 0.01) and PSA progression (5.0 vs. 0.3 ng/ml per year, p < 0.01) with corresponding optimal thresholds of 1.27 ng/ml per year and 1.28 ng/ml per year, respectively. The PSA doubling time suggested a threshold of 3.2 months, but this just failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.071).
CONCLUSION: In a study cohort of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy there emerged clear PSA thresholds for the presence of FC PET/CT-detectable lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22086143     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-1970-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  27 in total

1.  PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Vincenzo Scattoni; Rita Garcia Parra; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Francesco Montorsi; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Critical analysis of prostate-specific antigen doubling time calculation methodology.

Authors:  Robert S Svatek; Michael Shulman; Pankaj K Choudhary; Elie Benaim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer: initial experience.

Authors:  Daniel T Schmid; Hubert John; Roland Zweifel; Tibor Cservenyak; Gerrit Westera; Gerhard W Goerres; Gustav K von Schulthess; Thomas F Hany
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Evaluation of [11C]-choline positron-emission/computed tomography in patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen levels after primary treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ludwig Rinnab; Felix M Mottaghy; Norbert M Blumstein; Sven N Reske; Richard E Hautmann; Kathrin Hohl; Peter Möller; Thomas Wiegel; Rainer Kuefer; Juergen E Gschwend
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Characterization of choline uptake in prostate cancer cells following bicalutamide and docetaxel treatment.

Authors:  Sebastian A Müller; Korbinian Holzapfel; Christof Seidl; Uwe Treiber; Bernd J Krause; Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  The detection rate of [11C]choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  B J Krause; M Souvatzoglou; M Tuncel; K Herrmann; A K Buck; C Praus; T Schuster; H Geinitz; U Treiber; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Can prostate specific antigen derivatives and pathological parameters predict significant change in expectant management criteria for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Masood A Khan; H Ballentine Carter; Jonathan I Epstein; Michael C Miller; Patricia Landis; Patrick W Walsh; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  11C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  I J de Jong; J Pruim; P H Elsinga; W Vaalburg; H J A Mensink
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  PET studies of cerebral levodopa metabolism: a review of clinical findings and modeling approaches.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Kumakura; Paul Cumming
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.519

10.  [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Marino Cimitan; Roberto Bortolus; Sandro Morassut; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Antonio Garbeglio; Tanja Baresic; Eugenio Borsatti; Annalisa Drigo; Mauro G Trovò
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Asim Afaq; Deepak Batura; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Imaging of prostate cancer with PET/CT using (18)F-Fluorocholine.

Authors:  Reza Vali; Wolfgang Loidl; Christian Pirich; Werner Langesteger; Mohsen Beheshti
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 5.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  11C-choline PET/CT and PSA kinetics.

Authors:  Paolo Castellucci; Maria Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Comparative performance of PET tracers in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of literature.

Authors:  Chung Yao Yu; Bhushan Desai; Lingyun Ji; Susan Groshen; Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-09-06

8.  Detection rate of PET/CT in patients with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer using [68Ga]PSMA I&T and comparison with published data of [68Ga]PSMA HBED-CC.

Authors:  Christoph Berliner; Milena Tienken; Thorsten Frenzel; Yuske Kobayashi; Annabelle Helberg; Uve Kirchner; Susanne Klutmann; Dirk Beyersdorff; Lars Budäus; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Janos Mester; Peter Bannas
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  [Imaging diagnostics of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Kretschmer; M Seitz; A Graser; C G Stief; D Tilki
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in Patients With Biochemical Prostate Cancer Recurrence and Negative 18F-Choline-PET/CT.

Authors:  Christina Bluemel; Markus Krebs; Bülent Polat; Fränze Linke; Matthias Eiber; Samuel Samnick; Constantin Lapa; Michael Lassmann; Hubertus Riedmiller; Johannes Czernin; Domenico Rubello; Thorsten Bley; Saskia Kropf; Hans-Juergen Wester; Andreas K Buck; Ken Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.794

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.