Robin Nusslock1, Ellen Frank. 1. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. nusslock@northwestern.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research suggests that current diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorders may fail to include milder, but clinically significant, bipolar syndromes and that a substantial percentage of these conditions are diagnosed, by default, as unipolar major depression. Accordingly, a number of researchers have argued for the upcoming 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) to better account for subsyndromal hypomanic presentations. METHODS: The present paper is a critical review of research on subthreshold bipolarity, and an assessment of some of the challenges that researchers and clinicians might face if the DSM-5 were designed to systematically document subsyndromal hypomanic presentations. RESULTS: Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) who display subsyndromal hypomanic features, not concurrent with a major depressive episode, have a more severe course compared to individuals with MDD and no hypomanic features, and more closely resemble individuals with bipolar disorder on a number of clinical validators. CONCLUSION: There are clinical and scientific reasons for systematically documenting subsyndromal hypomanic presentations in the assessment and diagnosis of mood disorders. However, these benefits are balanced with important challenges, including (i) the difficulty in reliably identifying subsyndromal hypomanic presentations, (ii) operationalizing subthreshold bipolarity, (iii) differentiating subthreshold bipolarity from borderline personality disorder, (iv) the risk of over-diagnosing bipolar spectrum disorders, and (v) uncertainties about optimal interventions for subthreshold bipolarity.
BACKGROUND: Research suggests that current diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorders may fail to include milder, but clinically significant, bipolar syndromes and that a substantial percentage of these conditions are diagnosed, by default, as unipolar major depression. Accordingly, a number of researchers have argued for the upcoming 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) to better account for subsyndromal hypomanic presentations. METHODS: The present paper is a critical review of research on subthreshold bipolarity, and an assessment of some of the challenges that researchers and clinicians might face if the DSM-5 were designed to systematically document subsyndromal hypomanic presentations. RESULTS: Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) who display subsyndromal hypomanic features, not concurrent with a major depressive episode, have a more severe course compared to individuals with MDD and no hypomanic features, and more closely resemble individuals with bipolar disorder on a number of clinical validators. CONCLUSION: There are clinical and scientific reasons for systematically documenting subsyndromal hypomanic presentations in the assessment and diagnosis of mood disorders. However, these benefits are balanced with important challenges, including (i) the difficulty in reliably identifying subsyndromal hypomanic presentations, (ii) operationalizing subthreshold bipolarity, (iii) differentiating subthreshold bipolarity from borderline personality disorder, (iv) the risk of over-diagnosing bipolar spectrum disorders, and (v) uncertainties about optimal interventions for subthreshold bipolarity.
Authors: Robin Nusslock; Eddie Harmon-Jones; Lauren B Alloy; Snezana Urosevic; Kim Goldstein; Lyn Y Abramson Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2012-07-09
Authors: Christopher D Schneck; Kiki D Chang; Manpreet K Singh; Melissa P DelBello; David J Miklowitz Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Marc J Weintraub; Eric A Youngstrom; Sarah E Marvin; Jennifer L Podell; Patricia D Walshaw; Eunice Y Kim; Robert L Suddath; Marcy J Forgey-Borlick; Brittany N Matkevich; David J Miklowitz Journal: J Psychiatr Pract Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 1.325
Authors: Danella Hafeman; David Axelson; Christine Demeter; Robert L Findling; Mary A Fristad; Robert A Kowatch; Eric A Youngstrom; Sarah McCue Horwitz; L Eugene Arnold; Thomas W Frazier; Neal Ryan; Mary Kay Gill; Jessica C Hauser-Harrington; Judith Depew; Brieana M Rowles; Boris Birmaher Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: David J Miklowitz; Christopher D Schneck; Manpreet K Singh; Dawn O Taylor; Elizabeth L George; Victoria E Cosgrove; Meghan E Howe; L Miriam Dickinson; Judy Garber; Kiki D Chang Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-01-02 Impact factor: 8.829