Literature DB >> 22085294

120-W 2-µm thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet vapoenucleation of the prostate: 12-month follow-up.

Christopher Netsch1, Laura Pohlmann, Thomas R W Herrmann, Andreas J Gross, Thorsten Bach.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) has been introduced as a minimally invasive treatment modality of benign prostate obstruction (BPO). This study reports the largest series of patients with symptomatic BPO undergoing ThuVEP. Efficacy of this procedure was confirmed by prostate volume and PSA measurements at 12-month follow up, which have not been reported after ThuVEP so far.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 120-W 2-µm thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) for patients with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction.
METHOD: In total, 207 consecutive patients undergoing ThuVEP at our institution were evaluated prospectively. ThuVEP was carried out using the 120-W 2-µm continuous-wave Tm:YAG laser. The enucleated tissue was then morcellated within the bladder. Patient demographic, perioperative and 12-month follow-up data were analysed. The complications were assessed.
RESULTS: Mean preoperative prostate volume was 57.8 ± 31.5 mL. Total operation duration averaged 64.9 ± 29.9 min, and the enucleation time was 36.5 ± 20.1 min. The mean catheter time was 2.2 ± 0.6 days. Thirteen (6.28%) patients required a second-look operation in the immediate postoperative course (failed morcellation n= 1, clot retention n= 4, residual tissue at the apex of the prostate n= 8). Four patients needed blood transfusions (1.93%) postoperatively. In all, 147 (71%) patients were available for review at the 12-month follow-up mark. Quality of life (4.4 ± 1.3 vs 1.2 ± 1.1), international prostate symptom score (21.9 ± 7.2 vs 5.1 ± 4), maximum urinary flow rate (9.4 ± 3.8 vs 23.5 ± 10.9 mL/s), postvoiding residual urine (159.2 ± 153.2 vs 26.7 ± 38.3 mL), prostate-specific antigen (5.0 ± 5.2 vs 0.6 ± 0.5 ng/mL) and prostate volume (57.8 ± 31.5 vs 10.7 ± 4.4 mL) changed significantly (P= 0.000). Median prostate-specific antigen reduction and prostate volume reduction were 87% and 80% respectively at follow-up. Urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture developed in 1.45% and 1.93% respectively of the patients.
CONCLUSION: 120-W ThuVEP is a safe and efficacious procedure for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction. The incidence of complications with ThuVEP was low.
© 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22085294     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10767.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  17 in total

1.  [S2e guideline of the German urologists: Instrumental treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Authors:  T Bschleipfer; T Bach; R Berges; K Dreikorn; C Gratzke; S Madersbacher; M-S Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; O Reich; C Tschuschke; K Höfner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  A comparative study of diode laser and plasmakinetic in transurethral enucleation of the prostate for treating large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  Gang Wu; Zhe Hong; Chao Li; Cuidong Bian; Shengsong Huang; Denglong Wu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Impact of 120-W 2-μm continuous wave laser vapoenucleation of the prostate on sexual function.

Authors:  Yubin Wang; Jinkai Shao; Yongning Lu; Yongan Lü; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  A Review of Laser Treatment for Symptomatic BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia).

Authors:  Shiva Madhwan Nair; Marie Adrianne Pimentel; Peter John Gilling
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Nomenclature in thulium laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: it's time to pull the rabbit out of the hat.

Authors:  Serena Maruccia; Irene Fulgheri; Emanuele Montanari; Stefano Casellato; Luca Boeri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  The efficacy and safety of 2-μm continuous laser in the treatment of high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Wei Tao; Chuanyang Sun; Boxin Xue; Dongrong Yang; Mingchao Wang; Chunjie Cai; Yuxi Shan
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  [Anastomosis stenosis after radical prostatectomy and bladder neck stenosis after benign prostate hyperplasia treatment: reconstructive options].

Authors:  C M Rosenbaum; B Becker; A Gross; C Netsch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  [Operative therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia: enucleation procedures (HoLEP and ThuVEP)].

Authors:  T Bach; T Bschleipfer; R Muschter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  [Thulium vapoenucleation of prostates larger than 80 ml using a 1.9-µm and a 2-µm thulium laser. Early perioperative results from two centres].

Authors:  C Netsch; T Knoll; A J Gross; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  A randomized trial comparing thulium laser resection to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: four-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Di Cui; Feng Sun; Jian Zhuo; Xiaowen Sun; Bangmin Han; Fujun Zhao; Yifeng Jing; Jun Lu; Shujie Xia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.